The current Taycan has literally just been launched (press drives were about 3 weeks ago), so that's no surprise.The Taycan Turbo GT is quite a monster: 2.3s to 100kmh, 1034 hp, 1240Nm torque.
The current Turbo S has 952hp, apparently, but the one we have in the game is the previous gen? and has quite a bit less than that.
The Taycan Turbo GT is quite a monster: 2.3s to 100kmh, 1034 hp, 1240Nm torque.
I think 6:24 is the 4th fastest time? There was a Porsche 956 did 6:11 during the qualifying of Nürburgring 1000 km in 1983.Interessting video of the Lotus Evija X doing a record lap for EV production cars, although it has been heavily modified.
Still impressive for being the third fastest car around the green hell.
I would say pre-facelift. Some car manufacturers are just abusing the phrase 'all-new' or 'new gen', especially some Chinese brands.The Taycan Turbo GT is quite a monster: 2.3s to 100kmh, 1034 hp, 1240Nm torque.
The current Turbo S has 952hp, apparently, but the one we have in the game is the previous gen? and has quite a bit less than that.
I would say pre-facelift. Some car manufacturers are just abusing the phrase 'all-new' or 'new gen', especially some Chinese brands.
What about Life Cycle Impulse?Definitely pre-facelift. General rule of thumb is if the car didn't change chassis then it's called as facelift. Some people also separate it further into minor facelift and major facelift.
Major Facelift, it's just fancy way of saying itWhat about Life Cycle Impulse?
You're still going to be disappointed, because live service is here to stay, and I suspect it will be around for a long time.None of this should even be present in a potential FH6 as well.
I did mention that a live service game doesn't necessarily mean or have to have:You're still going to be disappointed, because live service is here to stay, and I suspect it will be around for a long time.
I tried to warn you about it years ago and people still didn't listen.
A hundred times this.I did mention that a live service game doesn't necessarily mean or have to have:
...especially if the game is paid for in the first place.
- Come-and-go mechanics and time-limited content
- Microtransactions in any way, shape or form
- Always-online DRM and anti-consumer policies
- Regression of content and features
I mean, the live service aspect was meant to grow the game's content and features over time, not bring content to the table then remove it temporarily for a long time, or permanently.
Technically it is the 4th fastest time.I think 6:24 is the 4th fastest time? There was a Porsche 956 did 6:11 during the qualifying of Nürburgring 1000 km in 1983.
Or indeed fifth. For some reason everyone always forgets that Bellof's record came in a qualifying session, in which there were also other cars. Jochen Mass and Jacky Ickx qualified another 956 (the one which won the race) in second in 6:16.850. Third was a shared Bellof/Ickx/Mass car at a 6:27, which only ran in qualifying and not the race, and the fastest non-956 was a Lancia LC2 at 6:41.147.Technically it is the 4th fastest time.
Back in 1983, Stefan Bellof set the record of 6.11.13 min in his Porsche 956 during training for the 1000km race the next day.
[...]
So officially it is the 3rd fastest but fans will say it´s only the fourth 😁
I can't think of any live service game that doesn't have time-limited content. While it would be possible to have a live service game that doesn't have it, I don't think it would be successful if people always felt that they can get anything in the game any time in the future.I did mention that a live service game doesn't necessarily mean or have to have:
- Come-and-go mechanics and time-limited content