Wakeem
Nurburgring - Mercedes CLK Touring Car '00 - 6'01.325
T1- 38.334
T2- 1'07.037
T3- 1'31.267
T4- 2'14.244
T5- 2'47.003
T6- 3'09.921
T7- 3'51.739
T8- 4'27.563
T9- 4'45.677
T10- 5'21.504
T11- 5'42.465
My T Times and Final Time...
CLK-DTM_NURBURGRING_Kent
6'02.100
0'37.912 T1
1'06.653 T2
1'31.138 T3
2'13.784 T4
2'46.461 T5
3'09.618 T6
3'51.969 T7
4'27.400 T8
4'45.786 T9
5'21.767 T10
5'42.678 T11
Those T times disappoint me and concern me.
1) They disappoint because I am falling behind by so much in certain areas.
2) They concern me for the same reason.
Wakeem/Kent (Difference for "Kent")
T01- 0'38.334 / 0'37.912 (-.422)
T02- 1'07.037 / 1'06.653 (-.384)
T03- 1'31.267 / 1'31.138 (-.129)
T04- 2'14.244 / 2'13.784 (-.460)
T05- 2'47.003 / 2'46.461 (-.542)
T06- 3'09.921 / 3'09.618 (-.303) (178mph on Straight)
T07- 3'51.739 / 3'51.969 (+.230) ("Karussell"- Wakeem gains .533)
T08- 4'27.563 / 4'27.400 (-.163) ("Kent" gains .393)
T09- 4'45.677 / 4'45.786 (+.109)
T10- 5'21.504 / 5'21.767 (+.263)
T11- 5'42.465 / 5'42.678 (+.213)
S/F- 6'01.325 / 6'02.100 (+.775)
What do you all think?
Personally, I am suprised to see the specific areas where Wakeem gains so much (such as the Karussell and the final section).
I felt like those sections in my lap were nearly as good as the rest of the lap even though they are areas where I use caution to stay clean.
Holl01, do you think you could shed some light on the subject by giving up your own T Times?
They should be faster than both Wakeem and I, but helpful none the less.
Oh, and again, thanks for participating everyone!
I've updated all the times except for this Ring lap I just finished (which I will update shortly).
Later.
Btw, flat-out, feel free to grab up all the last places you want.