- 23,871
- It/It
- GTP_TheCracker
The base C6 has the same type of suspension and is perfectly fine in daily driving. The Z06 is a rough rider because the suspension is stiffened to ridiculous levels so it would handle so well. There is nothing wrong with the suspension it has now.
Some would disagree with that:
On Road
EVO Magazine...And that, ultimately, highlights the Z06's only major failing. The Porsche is flawed, demanding a very particular driving style, but eventually you find a way to interpret its signals, and that in turn enables you to feel comfortable with its behaviour and get the most from it. The Noble and Lotus are paragons of benign brilliance, allowing you to simply get in them and enjoy them. In the Z06, despite the manifest improvements over the C6, there's an underlying aloofness that ensures you never feel inclined to feel for its limits. And while it has the grunt, grip and stopping power to keep pace, or even set the pace, without needing to dig that deep, it's this lack of ultimate tactility, its inability to fully engage you, that means it never truly delivers those genuine moments of inspiration that define the others.
On Track
EVO Magazine...There’s a bit of turn-in understeer (no bad thing), but it’s when you’re in the middle of the corner that the Z06 feels a little remote. You want that understeer to stabilise and then bleed away as you apply more throttle, but it doesn’t. Instead the front keeps pushing and then, when you’ve flexed your right ankle a millimetre too far, the car snaps sideways – this lack of equilibrium means you tend to need lots of small, accurate corrections.
Considering the very stiff ride, it’s very odd to find a bit too much body-roll, almost as if the anti-roll bars don’t match the springs and dampers.