ROAD_DOGG33J
Premium
- 14,322
- IL, USA
- holyc0w1
- holyc0w
That was just the closest Speedtest server.
I know this. But actually, no that's the server it told me I was currently running on. From Ontario. Other than this I don't know much about computers.
I don't think it's the density of users that's his issue, probably his connection line. I've lived in a high-VM density area (they do 9month contracts for students) and we maintained near our 10mb connection constantly but that's because we were in a Fibre Optic area.As others have said, it's all mainly dependant on how far are you are from the phone exchange.
I am on Virgin and get the 10meg I'm supposed to get, but I have a friend who's in an area so clogged with Virgin Media users he only got up to 2 meg on a 20 meg connection, with a HORRIBLE ping so he could do absolutely nothing online without lagging out.
Virgin told him that upgrading to 50 meg may improve things (trying to get money out of us I thought!), and it did, only slightly. Apparently the more expenive package you choose the higher piority your account becomes to get more bandwidth. But I don't know if that works for other providers.
So all in all, you're probably going to get that low "up to" speed no matter what you do. Changing providers maybe the only option, but then it won't be much of an improvement or you'll end up with something worse...
Yeah it's probably the connection line.I don't think it's the density of users that's his issue, probably his connection line. I've lived in a high-VM density area (they do 9month contracts for students) and we maintained near our 10mb connection constantly but that's because we were in a Fibre Optic area.
Eeexactly, and some companies just aren't set up to deal a stable connection. Tiscali used to be the worst offenders for it, and now they've merged into TalkTalk who I can only assume are even worse. We've had BT broadband for something like 3 years and it's been excellent - even if the company its self is hateful. The only issues I've had with it have (as it turns out) been down to the router. It'd be nice to see O2 behave in a similar away - I seem to remember Be getting excellent reviews prior to the O2 takeover, so let's hope it continues.
I don't think it's the density of users that's his issue, probably his connection line. I've lived in a high-VM density area (they do 9month contracts for students) and we maintained near our 10mb connection constantly but that's because we were in a Fibre Optic area.
I use Tiscali and when I used to use their DNS servers I had to reset my router every week or two and every 2-3 months get downtime. I've switched my DNS addresses to to the Opendns ones and it's been fine ever since. 👍
If you go here and tap in your phone number (more accurate) or postcode (less accurate), BT will tell you what the maximum speed they think your line can support is. We have an "up to 8Mb" package with PlusNet, BT rate our line to 1.5Mb, my router reports 1.56Mb and Speedtest.net give us 1.2Mb to Manchester.
Sam Knows is also terribly good if you're into tech details. Essentially, if many/most/all ISPs listed under the LLU section (Local Loop Unbundled) are checked as being able to provide you a service, you can expect to be able to get higher speeds than if many/most/all are crossed - a non-LLU BT exchange cannot provide speeds higher than 8Mb at the exchange itself, never mind 5km away. Our exchange is, on the whole, a non-LLU exchange, though Be. are unbundled and we may be able to receive an "up to 24Mb" service from them (if we lived on the exchange).