- 124
- Sirkevinofnelson
Suzuki Escudo: 8.633. Just tuned it for the heck of it. Never use it.
Oh no, heheViper srt10 '08 - 8.983
Big G's1.59g's. You have SRF (skid recovery force) on, turn it off and re-run. G's should be 1.29-1.31 (ish)
Wow, just alot of torque? No, just alot of SRF...skid recovery force was off just a lot of torque
I think this leaderboard was started with good intentions and a lot of effort was put into it. It makes it even more remarkable that it was done by a mod, seeing that this section of the forum is apparently viewed as the armpit of this site. For this we thank you! 👍 I applaud the effort but suggest that you require photo proof before posting any other times and remove any that haven't been formally submitted with proof. This will put an end to most of the issues within this thread. I'd also suggest that you format it in a way similar to Mafia's original concept. for a leaderboard. That way it will be a bit more organised and respected. I think the main problem is the lack of verification. There are quite a few trustworthy people here but also quite a few fraudulent claims as well. I hope you take this as constructive advice and not an attack on your work.👍
I think this leaderboard was started with good intentions and a lot of effort was put into it. It makes it even more remarkable that it was done by a mod, seeing that this section of the forum is apparently viewed as the armpit of this site. For this we thank you! 👍 I applaud the effort but suggest that you require photo proof before posting any other times and remove any that haven't been formally submitted with proof. This will put an end to most of the issues within this thread. I'd also suggest that you format it in a way similar to Mafia's original concept. for a leaderboard. That way it will be a bit more organised and respected. I think the main problem is the lack of verification. There are quite a few trustworthy people here but also quite a few fraudulent claims as well. I hope you take this as constructive advice and not an attack on your work.👍
I think this leaderboard was started with good intentions and a lot of effort was put into it. It makes it even more remarkable that it was done by a mod, seeing that this section of the forum is apparently viewed as the armpit of this site. For this we thank you! 👍 I applaud the effort but suggest that you require photo proof before posting any other times and remove any that haven't been formally submitted with proof. This will put an end to most of the issues within this thread. I'd also suggest that you format it in a way similar to Mafia's original concept. for a leaderboard. That way it will be a bit more organised and respected. I think the main problem is the lack of verification. There are quite a few trustworthy people here but also quite a few fraudulent claims as well. I hope you take this as constructive advice and not an attack on your work.👍
[/IMG]
71 GS Stage 1Mitsbishi Eclipse GT '06 11.313
Ford GT No Stripe '05 9.085
Audi LeMans Quattro '03 9.087
Enzo Ferrari 9.153
Viper SRT10 ACR '08 9.158
Supra RZ '97 9.997
Mustang SVT Cobra 9.996
Buick Special 9.947
Pontiac GTO '04 9.962
Thanks to KennyBlanco's basic setup for bringing all of my times down
Mitsbishi Eclipse GT '06 11.313
Ford GT No Stripe '05 9.085
Audi LeMans Quattro '03 9.087
Enzo Ferrari 9.153
Viper SRT10 ACR '08 9.158
Supra RZ '97 9.997
Mustang SVT Cobra 9.996
Buick Special 9.947
Pontiac GTO '04 9.962
Thanks to KennyBlanco's basic setup for bringing all of my times down
👍 good stuff, now read the guides given by the pros to bring it down even further, not saying Kenny isn't pro.
Both of those times are 10 G's higher than mine. I have an 11.313 in my Eclipse GT with .79 G's. My SRT4 is at 11.037 with the same .79G's. Sure the SRF is off?
Did you use ballast bro???
My Eclipse does 11.180sec at 0.88Gs with SRF of
If i had it on Gs would be 0.85 without ballast and time
would be 11.075sec,that was the time when i used it!!!
Also your SRT4 Gs should be around 0.85-0.86...
Try to understand that the use of ballast is something
common to all FWD cars but if you misuse it,you will
ruin your pass every time.
Agree, the use of ballast gives u better times if used wisely and more g's.
Kleo I tried the Alfa GTA and you are right it is faster but can't bring down below 12.013 I admit that I only play with her for 15 min cause I had to go to work, so I'll put more time into it later tonight.
Also why can't I find a used Eclipse GT in my ucd?
Yeah I'm using some ballast. I think 50 for the SRT4 and around 25 for the eclipse. I'm trying to figure FF out. I'm getting the times down a little bit at a time.
@kleo
Ok I'm closing the gap with the Citroen on you, I'm at 11.4xx, but dang it that Alfa is wicked faster than mine what's the HP on it?
I do believe mine is max out and can't help but notice that you're 0-60 time is similar than mine but 0-100 is way faster, that points me towards my last 3 gears.
Yeah I'm talking about the 3.8L one the '06 model, I've been searching for it for long time now.
It's a 620ps car so massive wheelspin
We all use full ballast 200kg man for SRT4
Unless you want to spin all the first 3 gears.
If you have now 11.0xx and use that probably
you will go under 10.9sec!!!
The only thing you said and it's the biggest truth
is that you try to understand FF
There are many FF cars with awesome chassis but
a lot of disadvantages and the exactly opposite.
One super fast and not played car with great potential
is Citroen C4 Coupe,great chassis,powerfull engine.
Time with only 5 passes was one of the fastest.
That helped a bunch! Went to 200 Ballast, time dropped from 11.03 to 10.982 and G's are at 88 now. Thanks
I forgot to tell you to launch in 2nd gear man!!!!
I forgot to tell you to launch in 2nd gear man!!!!