Civic SiR-II (EG) '92 1/4 Time!

B

beetwo

(Banned)

297

Australia

Bee-two

• Apr 10, 2012

• #1

Today I decided to tune my civics seriously, wondering what I can make em do.

Has anyone beaten my time with the same model Civic?

- Sorry its a bit big

 

KaroSVTR

(Banned)

2,854

NORTH HOLLYWOOD

Nuke_um_626

• Apr 10, 2012

• #2

beetwo

its a bit big

Click to expand...

Thats what she said loll

I have 1 but not tuned yet ill see what i can manage iv always wanted to tune these but just bin too lazy

 

B

beetwo

(Banned)

297

Australia

Bee-two

• Apr 10, 2012

• #3

Haha.
Yeah same so far online its performing quite well.

 

KaroSVTR

(Banned)

2,854

NORTH HOLLYWOOD

Nuke_um_626

• Apr 10, 2012

• #4

Ill give u some advise. Loose the wing. U dont need it.

 

B

beetwo

(Banned)

297

Australia

Bee-two

• Apr 10, 2012

• #5

Thought it improved something

 

KaroSVTR

(Banned)

2,854

NORTH HOLLYWOOD

Nuke_um_626

• Apr 10, 2012

• #6

beetwo

Thought it improved something

Click to expand...

Its it was RWD yeah but doesnt do anything for FF

 

Simple Matt

1,880

Somewhere..

l Flossy l

• Apr 10, 2012

• #7

Get rid of front camber!!

 

viperbeatsvette

(Banned)

2,179

Gold Coast/QLD

viperbeatsvette

im not a fanboy

• Apr 10, 2012

• #8

Hehe not fast enough for the EP

 

B

beetwo

(Banned)

297

Australia

Bee-two

• Apr 10, 2012

• #9

Don't have front camber :/. Haha yeah I know but for 360 h p goes allright

 

kleomenis5582

829

Kalamata

kleomenissarris@windowslive.com

• Apr 10, 2012

• #10

Wing at fwd cars its bad bro cause you need more aero in the front
If you have aero back you make the car lift more in front so,remove it!!!
This is DRAGS not cirquit....you have to remove everything that slows you down

 

Simple Matt

1,880

Somewhere..

l Flossy l

• Apr 10, 2012

• #11

So is this a standard car or..

 

B

beetwo

(Banned)

297

Australia

Bee-two

• Apr 10, 2012

• #12

I'm sure I can improve it by I think its pretty impressive for this model.

 

Swara

6,077

USA

swara96

• Apr 10, 2012

• #13

I will tune this car. The best I've gotten with a 2 minute tune is 12.069

 

c-losk

2,340

Wilbraham, MA

C-losk

• Apr 10, 2012

• #14

That is a good time for this little hatch, and of course is no match for the EP, hello HP difference. 👍

 

viperbeatsvette

(Banned)

2,179

Gold Coast/QLD

viperbeatsvette

im not a fanboy

• Apr 10, 2012

• #15

If that was pulling 12 flat and on a good run my scirocco was doing a car n a half I'm doing 11.95ish maybe a touch lower.. AWESOME haha

 

Swara

6,077

USA

swara96

• Apr 10, 2012

• #16

I love FF's haha

 

viperbeatsvette

(Banned)

2,179

Gold Coast/QLD

viperbeatsvette

im not a fanboy

• Apr 10, 2012

• #17

swara96

I love FF's haha

Click to expand...

I love them too.. Haha come out of a roundabout and floor it and get understeer then a bit of oversteer. Lol I don't drive my swift the way it was designed for..
I also like drifting FFs just hold the e brake and balance the steering

 

KaroSVTR

(Banned)

2,854

NORTH HOLLYWOOD

Nuke_um_626

• Apr 10, 2012

• #18

Its a quick tune i can prolly get a better time then this.

[/IMG]

 

c-losk

2,340

Wilbraham, MA

C-losk

• Apr 10, 2012

• #19

That is a good time, I just didn't bother with mine cause way back the fastest was 12.3 maybe and my Ek was way faster so I stuck with that, now I'm running my Dc5 and sometimes my Prelude.

 

KaroSVTR

(Banned)

2,854

NORTH HOLLYWOOD

Nuke_um_626

• Apr 10, 2012

• #20

c-losk

That is a good time, I just didn't bother with mine cause way back the fastest was 12.3 maybe and my Ek was way faster so I stuck with that, now I'm running my Dc5 and sometimes my Prelude.

Click to expand...

Thanks bro. Yeah i feel you. When it comes to FF i always take out either my 99 DC2 or my Eclipse GT

 

c-losk

2,340

Wilbraham, MA

C-losk

• Apr 10, 2012

• #21

KaroSVTR

Thanks bro. Yeah i feel you. When it comes to FF i always take out either my 99 DC2 or my Eclipse GT

Click to expand...

You know the other day, before I moved, I was running my Srt4 against an RX8 and this guy could not beat me at all wich made me believe it had a bad tune, how fast are they? Sometimes I also use the Citroen C4, very underrated.

 

viperbeatsvette

(Banned)

2,179

Gold Coast/QLD

viperbeatsvette

im not a fanboy

• Apr 10, 2012

• #22

KaroSVTR

Thanks bro. Yeah i feel you. When it comes to FF i always take out either my 99 DC2 or my Eclipse GT

Click to expand...

DC2 is one of my favourites, I only use 30kg on mine and it traps 124 at Indy

c-losk

You know the other day, before I moved, I was running my Srt4 against an RX8 and this guy could not beat me at all wich made me believe it had a bad tune, how fast are they? Sometimes I also use the Citroen C4, very underrated.

Click to expand...

Umm rx8 I'm sure can punt low 10s possibly high 9.9s.. I'm sure he had an average 'tune'

 

Swara

6,077

USA

swara96

• Apr 10, 2012

• #23

viperbeatsvette

DC2 is one of my favourites, I only use 30kg on mine and it traps 124 at Indy



Umm rx8 I'm sure can punt low 10s possibly high 9.9s.. I'm sure he had an average 'tune'

Click to expand...

I'm getting 11.891 on my DC2 '98, which I'm quite proud of lol because the 99 is the fastest one.

 

B

beetwo

(Banned)

297

Australia

Bee-two

• Apr 10, 2012

• #24

Great time

 

c-losk

2,340

Wilbraham, MA

C-losk

• Apr 10, 2012

• #25

viperbeatsvette

Umm rx8 I'm sure can punt low 10s possibly high 9.9s.. I'm sure he had an average 'tune'

Click to expand...

Yeah, thats what I said, it "made me believe he had a bad tune", but it felt good cause he kept running me hopping to beat me.

 

Master__Shake_

1,835

New york

IvIaster__Shake_

• Apr 10, 2012

• #26

swara96

I'm getting 11.891 on my DC2 '98, which I'm quite proud of lol because the 99 is the fastest one.

Click to expand...

'98 & '99 should have similar times because their HP ratings are about the same. I noticed the '95 is less weight so, if I can find a low mile one, I might try tuning it to see the difference. It may have less HP though.

 

c-losk

2,340

Wilbraham, MA

C-losk

• Apr 10, 2012

• #27

Master__Shake_

'98 & '99 should have similar times because their HP ratings are about the same. I noticed the '95 is less weight so, if I can find a low mile one, I might try tuning it to see the difference. It may have less HP though.

Click to expand...

I was about to say that, 98 & 99 weight 1080kg compared to 1060kg for the 95,altough the TQ comes up at a higher RPM 7,500 compared to 6,200 for the 98 & 99, not sure what that would do but hey it won't kill to find out.

 

Master__Shake_

1,835

New york

IvIaster__Shake_

• Apr 10, 2012

• #28

c-losk

I was about to say that, 98 & 99 weight 1080kg compared to 1060kg for the 95,altough the TQ comes up at a higher RPM 7,500 compared to 6,200 for the 98 & 99, not sure what that would do but hey it won't kill to find out.

Click to expand...

Is your 95 low mileage? I'd be interested in trading to see if it can keep up with the others, the one I have now has 40k+ on it.

 

c-losk

2,340

Wilbraham, MA

C-losk

• Apr 10, 2012

• #29

Master__Shake_

Is your 95 low mileage? I'd be interested in trading to see if it can keep up with the others, the one I have now has 40k+ on it.

Click to expand...

Not sure, I can have my bro check cause I dup my acct in his console.

 

Swara

6,077

USA

swara96

• Apr 10, 2012

• #30

Master__Shake_

'98 & '99 should have similar times because their HP ratings are about the same. I noticed the '95 is less weight so, if I can find a low mile one, I might try tuning it to see the difference. It may have less HP though.

Click to expand...

The 99 is usually faster by some lol