- 193
- Mir
- deacon-blues082
Well I was serious about that last part about wasting seat time, but my point was that it doesn't make a noticeable difference so we can't possibly know if someones changed it or not. It should be a given that it's frowned upon. Shoot I frown every time I see a new driver ask about changing the brake balance and someone says "sure you can change it. You can also add chassis reinforcement.) If it absolutely must be disclosed, it should be prefaced with something like "Some people go against the tenets of good racecraft and being a gentlemanly driver and seek an unfair advantage by......" I'm just glad we can regulate what we can.I hope you're joking. The point is that the cars should be the same in terms of "physical" characteristics. This is easily done by not changing brake bias or adding additional chassis rigidity. Extraneous factors will always be present. But just because that's true, why not do what we can to at least normalize the actual car's physics? C'mon man.
Question: What are the GT-Academy rules about cars and changing tires? Might be a good idea for us to consider those limitations as well...... IF we what to help our drivers reach the finals.
Very true. I bet they will have to drive at least one car on comfort tires.
Last edited: