2.0 Advanced wk. 19 Poll

Camouflage

  • [URL=http://img512.imageshack.us/my.php?image=zondaeatmysmoke2sq.jpg][IMG]http://img107.imageshack.u

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • [URL=http://img215.imageshack.us/my.php?image=speed12small7ne.jpg][IMG]http://img107.imageshack.us/i

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    47
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Juhu made it in!

Voted for the Ford GT! Great shot and something completely different from the rest (which is great as well)!

Very good job form everyone! I'm honoured to share the poll with you guys!

Good luck! 👍
 
Well raise my rent.....

I just suck this week, I didnt make the cut in any comp this week :yuck:

ah well..

I went with the GT
 
It was really difficult to choose only ten shots from like 30 shots... :indiff: I tried to make a balance between creativity and an overall good pic.

I can vote too, right? :dopey:
 
Such a shame the Civic race car couldn't make it in. It was a nice pic. Oh well, gave it to the Ford GT.
 
Toronado
Such a shame the Civic race car couldn't make it in. It was a nice pic. Oh well, gave it to the Ford GT.

Yea too bad it was production cars only. Otherwise that shot was selected for the poll right away...
 
I think some people confused camoflague with colour coordination...

one that didnt make it in but which was also very good was the small car on the pedestrian crossing, like the ford GT it is in full sight but makes use of contrasting tones to effect its disguise.
 
When I was thinking of what to do this week, I originally tried parking a black Dodge Viper on a pedestrian crossing at Opera Paris, but the lines didn't quite match up, so I ended up going with the GT.
 
Where the **** is atlop's shot? (the one Brock is talking about). That's the (only) one that gets my vote!
(i'm not complaining about the top 10 choice ofcourse, just expressing how i like that shot).

And um... why is there a preview in the poll...?

Oh and: great shot MasterD1253!

Oh and um... get the machine that goes PING!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back