2001 Jaguar XKR-R Concept

  • Thread starter Shannon
  • 22 comments
  • 741 views
15,799
I love this Jag. I reckon it looks so sweet :drool:
PicFetch

Don't really like the specifications though. I won't post them, you can find out for yourselves. :P
 
Sheesh, you people are like leeches!

All right, I found a new picture. Google needs to update their database. Losers.
 
Originally posted by M5Power
Maybe Jaguar will steal BMW's 'M' idea with their own line of 'R' cars.

"Will"? I thought they did. I also thought Audi went with their "S" line (based upon the reconizability of BMW's "M" line). Come to think of it, Chevy's got their Z## line, Toyota the T-Sport, Honda's Type-R/Type-S...I think just about every company's got their own "M division". Not that I'm complaining...

Back on topic: I much prefer the F-Type to the XKR-R (and I really like the XKR). It's so...Jaguar. ;)
 
M is their in house performance division. As far as I know there is no Chevrolet division called Z. If there is, it does not seem as known as BMW's M.
 
Hooligan: I think Toyota's T division is a take on Honda's R division (which, in the end, leads back to M, I know, I know).

Talentless: Every nice-edition Chevy has a "Z" designation. Z71, Z24, Z06.
 
Well, it's not an in-house tuner, but it's the same principle. Maximising power and style and charging for it!
 
Originally posted by M5Power
Hooligan: I think Toyota's T division is a take on Honda's R division (which, in the end, leads back to M, I know, I know).

Talentless: Every nice-edition Chevy has a "Z" designation. Z71, Z24, Z06.
Wrong! Every nice Chevy has a "C" designation. C5, C5-R. ;)
 
Back