2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution RS

Super-Supra

(Banned)
4,111
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution RS


For 2004, Lancer Evolution buyers may opt for leather front Recaro(R) seats, and they may opt for a 315-watt Infinity(R) sound system, complete with subwoofer. A limited number of brave souls may also opt for the latest trim level, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution RS.

If the lightweight, turbocharged, all-wheel-drive Lancer Evolution was not the right car for you, then the Lancer Evolution RS is even less right. But for racing purists, compact car tuners and hard-core driving enthusiasts, the best bang-for-the-buck sports sedan just got better. Thanks to numerous weight-saving measures, the Lancer Evolution RS tips the scales nearly 150 pounds lighter than the Lancer Evolution. Its featherweight status notwithstanding, the RS has also been blessed with quicker reflexes: a front helical-type limited slip differential and a rear crossbar help to improve the handling of one of the world's best-handling automobiles.

"Lancer Evolution RS reflects the essence of high-performance value," said Finbarr O'Neill, co-chairman and chief executive officer of Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. (MMNA). "We've boiled the cost-per-thrill ratio down to its lowest conceivable point, providing tuners and racing enthusiasts with more of what they need, and less of what they don't."

Less is More

When the difference between winning and losing can be measured in tenths of a second, the difference between the 3,321-lb Lancer Evolution and the 3,175-lb Lancer Evolution RS becomes significant.

To achieve a curb weight lower than the already-lean Lancer Evolution, the Lancer Evolution RS sheds several non-essential items. Most notable from outside, the RS is not bedecked with the Lancer Evolution's distinctive rear wing spoiler. The high-intensity discharge headlights also were deleted, as was the rear window wiper. Inside, RS drivers must make do without an air conditioning system or an AM/FM/CD audio system. There are no power mechanisms for the windows, locks, or side mirrors. Trunk compartment trim has been removed, as have vanity mirrors, rear assist grips, map lamps, and the parking brake lever's leather covering. An antilock brake system is not available.

There are also fewer color choices; the Lancer Evolution RS is available in Rally Red or Weightless White.

A Differential Difference

The Lancer Evolution RS doesn't compromise performance, whether performance is defined as straight-ahead acceleration or exit speed out of an apex. Higher performance is achieved in part by lowering the vehicle's mass, but the RS is also better equipped to handle lateral motion, thanks to the addition of its front limited slip differential.

This helical limited slip differential (LSD) takes the place of the Lancer Evolution's open front differential, giving the RS mechanical front and rear differentials that split power delivery between their respective left and right wheels, and a center differential that splits the power between front and rear. The front differential's helical design provides it with smooth operation and superior responsiveness. Small in both size and weight, the helical unit does not require special oil or additional maintenance.

Helical-type limited-slip differentials offer several advantages over the clutch-type or viscous LSDs. Viscous limited-slip units tend to wear out after extended use, as their oil is heated and reheated until it degrades, rendering the unit ineffective. Clutch-type differentials provide good off-the-line traction, but the 50/50 stability that's beneficial in a straight line is not so desirable when a vehicle is turning. The helical-type limited slip provides better durability and performance when it's needed most: while turning. Unlike an open differential, which shifts power to the wheel with less grip, the helical LSD constantly shifts the bias toward the wheel that has more traction.

Under straight-line acceleration, power remains evenly split between the front wheels. While cornering (e.g. accelerating out of a turn), the helical LSD directs power away from the inside wheel and toward the outside wheel, allowing the driver to begin accelerating earlier and exit the turn at a higher speed, without losing traction in the process.

Performance is also improved on slippery mud or snow that's often encountered on isolated dirt roads, where the Lancer Evolution series spent much of its development.



evors6.jpg


This car is beautiful.
 
I wouldnt get a RS the base Evolution is better IMO. Even though it weights more it has A/C which i cannot live without living in TN when it get hot it gets hot. I cant bare without A/C. Its lighter and faster on the circuit due to its lightweight its basically a stripped Evo. The LanEvo look better with the wing. ;)
 
It is listing under $27,000. . . Personally the true tuner would opt for the bare bone minimum one. . . Along with taking it on the track, there really is no need for the wing except going 160mph and it gets a little loose at that speed. If you need a wing put an aftermarket one on it and not one to compensate for a small mid-section either. . .
 
Originally posted by phreakypat
Almost looks like my car except without the EVO engine and design.
I deem thee Banninated for dummass remarks such as no EVO engine in an Evolution
5banned.gif
 
315-watt Infinity(R) sound system, complete with subwoofer.

Dude, it's soo damn hot in here without any A/C. Atleast I have a kickin' sound system to listen to when I'm running around the track! :rolleyes:
 
whats with the major popularity with evolution lancers lately, thats all i have been hearing about on these forums lately
 
Four-wheel-drive
280 horsepower
Light
Nimble
Great track car
Great street car
Reasonable price
Plus, this is the first time the Lancer Evolution has been available in the US.

You do the math.
 
Originally posted by Integra Type R
Dude, it's soo damn hot in here without any A/C. Atleast I have a kickin' sound system to listen to when I'm running around the track! :rolleyes:

That is not standard, it is only an option. The RS does not come with a stereo. But, Mitsubishi is offering an "Urban Jungle" package that equips the RS with A/C and some of the other ammenities that it lacks. About the wing, SCC tested the RS in the last issue and said they could feel the lack of a wing at around 115 to 120 mph. And I would like to add that the 150 lbs that Mitsu claims is off of a fully loaded Evo. My Evo with just the wing, no sunroof, is only 88 lbs heavier than an RS. This car is great if it is just your track car, but if you want a daily driver the regular Evo is a much better option.
 
Originally posted by Ser0119
That is not standard, it is only an option. The RS does not come with a stereo.


I know that, but why would it even be an option on a car that is geared toward racing around a track?
 
Originally posted by Integra Type R
I know that, but why would it even be an option on a car that is geared toward racing around a track?

The first sentence of the article is talking about the new options for the regular Evo. Sunroof, Infinty sound, and leather Recaros are options for the regular Evo, the Urban Jungle package is the option package for the RS and it includes A/C, power windows, power locks, power mirrors, and keyless entry, but still no stereo.
 
Originally posted by Integra Type R
I know that, but why would it even be an option on a car that is geared toward racing around a track?

if thats the case, why would it have passenger seats, carpet, standard seatbelts, standard steering wheel etc.
 
I love the idea of the RS and bringing it to the US will catch more eye of the tuning crowd, but I still would want the full model EVO for the fact that it looks alot better. I can take all the A/C and other crap out myself.. Did the same with my DSM :cool:
 
Originally posted by miata13B
I deem thee Banninated for dummass remarks such as no EVO engine in an Evolution
5banned.gif


Just for your information a Lancer without the EVO engine's 4G63 is the 4G64 and without the EVO design would mean its the base model Lancer non-EVO. Now tell me who's a dumbass! :D
 
Originally posted by phreakypat
Almost looks like my car except without the EVO engine and design.

Originally posted by phreakypat
Just for your information a Lancer without the EVO engine's 4G63 is the 4G64 and without the EVO design would mean its the base model Lancer non-EVO. Now tell me who's a dumbass! :D
Actually the article is about an Evolution, so in theory my belief tells me it would be using the Evolution engine. . . but then again you are the all-knowing person and is always right so this Evolution doesn't have an Evolution engine then and it is a Lancer. . . Yeah I'm the dumbass. . . now go post somewhere else!

Are you even reading what you wrote?
1nutkick.gif


Oh, and the Just for your information part of your post really makes me crack up. . . You know your engines alright, but apparently you don't know how to read an article that this thread started with. . . Think before you post there buddy and heres a coke and a smile. . . have a nice day. . .
drink.gif
finger.gif
 
Originally posted by miata13B
Actually the article is about an Evolution, so in theory my belief tells me it would be using the Evolution engine. . . but then again you are the all-knowing person and is always right so this Evolution doesn't have an Evolution engine then and it is a Lancer. . . Yeah I'm the dumbass. . . now go post somewhere else!

Are you even reading what you wrote?
1nutkick.gif


Oh, and the Just for your information part of your post really makes me crack up. . . You know your engines alright, but apparently you don't know how to read an article that this thread started with. . . Think before you post there buddy and heres a coke and a smile. . . have a nice day. . .
drink.gif
finger.gif



So how does the article of the RS Evolution come into play into this whole conversation? If you know ANYTHING about the US Lancer line there is a Lancer model without the 4G63 engine as used in the regular Evolution and RS. Maybe you should think before you answer as I didn't even refer to the article at all and was talking about an entirely different car. So yes your post makes me crack up to. Go and STFU!
And yes its called a Lancer
 
Originally posted by phreakypat
So how does the article of the RS Evolution come into play into this whole conversation? If you know ANYTHING about the US Lancer line there is a Lancer model without the 4G63 engine as used in the regular Evolution and RS. Maybe you should think before you answer as I didn't even refer to the article at all and was talking about an entirely different car. So yes your post makes me crack up to. Go and STFU!
And yes its called a Lancer
You first statement, in which you posted in this thread you stated "it looks like my car with an Evolution engine or design. . . The car this thread is based on is an Evolution and has the evolution engine, thus the first comment I made to you. . . Might help to specify what you are talking about or someone might think you are talking about the Evolution RS in which I think you are talking about. . . Read your own posts and "go and STFU"
 
Originally posted by miata13B
You first statement, in which you posted in this thread you stated "it looks like my car with an Evolution engine or design. . . The car this thread is based on is an Evolution and has the evolution engine, thus the first comment I made to you. . . Read your own posts and "go and STFU"



How about you read my first post again. I said it looks like my car WITHOUT the EVO engine and the EVO design. The design in terms of the hood looking entirely different, most obvious, and some other exterior designs that make it look totally different from my car. So the engine for my car is totally different. Its a 2.0L SOHC. I was basically saying my 2002 Lancer ES ALMOST looks like the RS. I will now say it loud and clear MY CAR IS NOT AN EVO nor an RS! No it does not have the EVO or RS engine. Yes it looks different, but somehow the EVO and RS design might be based on the design of the Lancer model of my car. In japan my car is called the Cedia. I'm not sure if they call it "Lancer" also, but in the U.S. its called "Lancer".
 
Originally posted by phreakypat
Almost looks like my car except without the EVO engine and design.
This post leads me to believe that you have an Evolution. Try a little different context such as - The Evolution RS looks like my car which does not have the Evolution engine or the design. . . Context is a wonderful thing you learn on the forums. . . trust me it took me time to learn it too, but when you post it is better to specify what you are saying instead of making the brass assumption that everyone understands your mind set and exactly what you posted.
 
Originally posted by miata13B
This post leads me to believe that you have an Evolution. Try a little different context such as - The Evolution RS looks like my car which does not have the Evolution engine or the design. . . Context is a wonderful thing you learn on the forums. . . trust me it took me time to learn it too, but when you post it is better to specify what you are saying instead of making the brass assumption that everyone understands your mind set and exactly what you posted.

Sorry about that. Perhaps if I stated, "My car is not an EVO or EVO RS. It looks like it though." Maybe it would've been more clear. :)
 
Back