- 22,551
- Arizona
- HamiltonMP427
So after a easily predicted 2015 season winner in the constructor category (and arguably the WDC one) it is now time to collectively join again (which is already being done). And once again bring info, news, trades and development as well as the circus drama together to see who will be crowned as the 2016 WCC winner. <- My bet a certain Silver car under a German moniker.
So what's really important to know for those who don't know the technical side of F1 and what adjustments to the rule book among other things may prove to be a leading cause to one team winning over all others?
For starters tires, engine homologation and distribution to customer team, and probably the build up to the 2017 season where much bigger changes will be seen.
For those curious of the changes to this season read the info from the spoiler tag below
Engine switches: RBR, STR, and Lotus becoming a factory team.
RBR is probably the most important of all these updates when it comes to their PU next season. As they'll be branded tag heuer though in reality the same manufacture for the past decade to power them. However, this is a bit more key than simply having a group rebrand an engine under their image (not a first in F1), from a investment and marketing sense for one but also well put by @AJ see below.
STR, will return to Ferrari power, but more importantly will only do so in the same manner as Marussia Manor did and run an older power unit. The 2016 power unit which probably isn't fully finished was still first introduced and ready to race in Japan 2015, and has been used at the end of the season by both drivers.
Renault (ex Lotus): Have officially confirmed their return to F1 as a works team and not just a supplier of engines. In doing such they will inform the public more in depth next month.
Important info carried over from 2015 thread for 2016 season
So what's really important to know for those who don't know the technical side of F1 and what adjustments to the rule book among other things may prove to be a leading cause to one team winning over all others?
For starters tires, engine homologation and distribution to customer team, and probably the build up to the 2017 season where much bigger changes will be seen.
For those curious of the changes to this season read the info from the spoiler tag below
Power Units
In 2016 as things sit at the moment Formula 1 teams will be allowed to use five power units per driver, an increase on the four allowed in 2015. The reason for this increase is the introduction of Azerbaijan and the return of Germany to a 21 race calendar. As it stands, this will actually make life easier for the engine builders as the life requirement of each power unit will go down slightly compared to 2015. Significantly, however, if only a single race drops off the calendar (and the US GP is looking to be struggling) then the allocation reverts to just four power units and an increase in the life requirement of each power unit. This will be creating something of a headache for the engine gurus at Mercedes, Ferrari, Honda and Renault (and Red Bull now) as they work out the life for each component. With five power units and 21 races, each unit will have to last for about 1,250km of racing mileage (note that this figure does not include free practice or qualifying) but with only twenty races each unit would have to last 1,500km. It may seem a small difference but – as Nico Rosberg showed when he pushed his ageing engine a little too far at Monza - once practice sessions are taken into account it could be a critical difference.
Interestingly the regulations also make life a little easier for new power unit suppliers. In its first season a new manufacturer gets an extra unit added to its allocation, something Honda probably would have liked in 2015, while they also get a slightly more generous token spend.
Every power unit used in 2016 must be homologated by the end of February, which means in reality the development work must be complete and signed off before the start of winter testing as a design dossier has to be delivered to the FIA on Valentine's Day. This means that the power units must be finalised before they have ever been run on track, it is clear that the FIA engine department does not want the power unit engineers to have an easy winter!
Crucially changes can be made after the deadline for reasons of cost, safety and reliability, and in season performance development will also continue within the token structure.
It will now also be possible for old specification power units to be re-homologated for use by specific teams, in other words, Toro Rosso can use a 2015 Ferrari power unit in 2016 while Haas, Sauber and the works team will use the latest spec units.
Testing
In terms of testing, firstly power unit suppliers are now banned from private testing using cars built to the 2012-2016 technical regulations. In 2015 it would have been possible for a power unit supplier to use a car designed to the F1 regulations but not owned by a team (for example the Perinn) to test.
Additionally, up to twelve days of in or post season testing can be conducted on behalf of the tyre supplier, currently Pirelli. This testing would be for the purpose of tyre development and not car development and is at the discretion of the FIA. These tests would be divided into six two day tests.
Only two pre-season tests will take place, both held at the Circuit de Catalunya in 2016, the maximum testing mileage remains 15,000km.
This further restriction on testing makes it even harder for teams to get an understanding of setup, tyres and the car overall, especially if any of them have production delays or reliability issues in the lead up to the pre-season tests. It also makes it rather tricky for young drivers to get up to speed in the real cars.
Safety study
The FIA is continuing its safety crusade and in 2016 much of that is focused on understanding crashes and what happens during a crash. For this purpose each car will be fitted with a high speed camera made by Magneti Marelli which will be used to study the drivers head movements during an impact. Additionally drivers will now all have to wear in-ear accelerometers whenever they are in the car.
Driving standards
This one will likely see lots of penalties applied through the season, in 2015 the rules said that “drivers must not deliberately leave the track without a justifiable reason”, but in the 2016 rules it rather politely states that “drivers must make every reasonable effort to use the track at all times and may not deliberately leave the track without a justifiable reason.” It is a subtle change in wording and I think leaves the situation rather open to interpretation. What does 'reasonable effort' really mean? I think this one will be revisited during the season.
Wind tunnel usage
The FIA has clearly become a little suspicious of some teams aerodynamic development rate so now requires every team to supply two digital photos (front and rear quarter views one must assume) with a date stamp on them of the wind tunnel models before each run. The pictures have to show the entire working section with the model clearly shown in full. This would highlight if a team has pushed the rules or even broken them, at least that is the theory. With data theft in the spotlight at the moment in F1 it is worth noting that the FIA is creating the ultimate F1 aerodynamic archive all in one place, creates quite a challenge in terms of cyber security.
Tyres
The new tyre rules need to be examined in more detail in the coming weeks but the headlines are that the teams have more freedom in terms of tyre selection strategies but critically those selections must be made a full eight weeks ahead of European races and fourteen weeks ahead of non-European rounds. This means that the tyres for the Australian Grand Prix must be selected on 17th December. This is quite a challenge for the teams as they have not run their 2016 cars yet and may not have tested all five compounds of slick tyre at the post season Abu Dhabi test, therefore they have to rely on Pirelli data which itself may not be fully validated on track. For Haas in particular this is a really tough call as it has yet to run its car at all. It's all a bit of a case of the one eyed man leading the blind.
Subtle though they may seem, even minor changes to the Sporting Regulations have the ability to shake up the order on the track. For me, rules are perhaps becoming overly complex and in some cases for no really good reason. However most of the changes have been made to stir up the order a little in a year when no major technical changes will be enforced and that can only be a good thing…
Credit to crash.net for the info
In 2016 as things sit at the moment Formula 1 teams will be allowed to use five power units per driver, an increase on the four allowed in 2015. The reason for this increase is the introduction of Azerbaijan and the return of Germany to a 21 race calendar. As it stands, this will actually make life easier for the engine builders as the life requirement of each power unit will go down slightly compared to 2015. Significantly, however, if only a single race drops off the calendar (and the US GP is looking to be struggling) then the allocation reverts to just four power units and an increase in the life requirement of each power unit. This will be creating something of a headache for the engine gurus at Mercedes, Ferrari, Honda and Renault (and Red Bull now) as they work out the life for each component. With five power units and 21 races, each unit will have to last for about 1,250km of racing mileage (note that this figure does not include free practice or qualifying) but with only twenty races each unit would have to last 1,500km. It may seem a small difference but – as Nico Rosberg showed when he pushed his ageing engine a little too far at Monza - once practice sessions are taken into account it could be a critical difference.
Interestingly the regulations also make life a little easier for new power unit suppliers. In its first season a new manufacturer gets an extra unit added to its allocation, something Honda probably would have liked in 2015, while they also get a slightly more generous token spend.
Every power unit used in 2016 must be homologated by the end of February, which means in reality the development work must be complete and signed off before the start of winter testing as a design dossier has to be delivered to the FIA on Valentine's Day. This means that the power units must be finalised before they have ever been run on track, it is clear that the FIA engine department does not want the power unit engineers to have an easy winter!
Crucially changes can be made after the deadline for reasons of cost, safety and reliability, and in season performance development will also continue within the token structure.
It will now also be possible for old specification power units to be re-homologated for use by specific teams, in other words, Toro Rosso can use a 2015 Ferrari power unit in 2016 while Haas, Sauber and the works team will use the latest spec units.
Testing
In terms of testing, firstly power unit suppliers are now banned from private testing using cars built to the 2012-2016 technical regulations. In 2015 it would have been possible for a power unit supplier to use a car designed to the F1 regulations but not owned by a team (for example the Perinn) to test.
Additionally, up to twelve days of in or post season testing can be conducted on behalf of the tyre supplier, currently Pirelli. This testing would be for the purpose of tyre development and not car development and is at the discretion of the FIA. These tests would be divided into six two day tests.
Only two pre-season tests will take place, both held at the Circuit de Catalunya in 2016, the maximum testing mileage remains 15,000km.
This further restriction on testing makes it even harder for teams to get an understanding of setup, tyres and the car overall, especially if any of them have production delays or reliability issues in the lead up to the pre-season tests. It also makes it rather tricky for young drivers to get up to speed in the real cars.
Safety study
The FIA is continuing its safety crusade and in 2016 much of that is focused on understanding crashes and what happens during a crash. For this purpose each car will be fitted with a high speed camera made by Magneti Marelli which will be used to study the drivers head movements during an impact. Additionally drivers will now all have to wear in-ear accelerometers whenever they are in the car.
Driving standards
This one will likely see lots of penalties applied through the season, in 2015 the rules said that “drivers must not deliberately leave the track without a justifiable reason”, but in the 2016 rules it rather politely states that “drivers must make every reasonable effort to use the track at all times and may not deliberately leave the track without a justifiable reason.” It is a subtle change in wording and I think leaves the situation rather open to interpretation. What does 'reasonable effort' really mean? I think this one will be revisited during the season.
Wind tunnel usage
The FIA has clearly become a little suspicious of some teams aerodynamic development rate so now requires every team to supply two digital photos (front and rear quarter views one must assume) with a date stamp on them of the wind tunnel models before each run. The pictures have to show the entire working section with the model clearly shown in full. This would highlight if a team has pushed the rules or even broken them, at least that is the theory. With data theft in the spotlight at the moment in F1 it is worth noting that the FIA is creating the ultimate F1 aerodynamic archive all in one place, creates quite a challenge in terms of cyber security.
Tyres
The new tyre rules need to be examined in more detail in the coming weeks but the headlines are that the teams have more freedom in terms of tyre selection strategies but critically those selections must be made a full eight weeks ahead of European races and fourteen weeks ahead of non-European rounds. This means that the tyres for the Australian Grand Prix must be selected on 17th December. This is quite a challenge for the teams as they have not run their 2016 cars yet and may not have tested all five compounds of slick tyre at the post season Abu Dhabi test, therefore they have to rely on Pirelli data which itself may not be fully validated on track. For Haas in particular this is a really tough call as it has yet to run its car at all. It's all a bit of a case of the one eyed man leading the blind.
Subtle though they may seem, even minor changes to the Sporting Regulations have the ability to shake up the order on the track. For me, rules are perhaps becoming overly complex and in some cases for no really good reason. However most of the changes have been made to stir up the order a little in a year when no major technical changes will be enforced and that can only be a good thing…
Credit to crash.net for the info
Engine switches: RBR, STR, and Lotus becoming a factory team.
RBR is probably the most important of all these updates when it comes to their PU next season. As they'll be branded tag heuer though in reality the same manufacture for the past decade to power them. However, this is a bit more key than simply having a group rebrand an engine under their image (not a first in F1), from a investment and marketing sense for one but also well put by @AJ see below.
STR, will return to Ferrari power, but more importantly will only do so in the same manner as Marussia Manor did and run an older power unit. The 2016 power unit which probably isn't fully finished was still first introduced and ready to race in Japan 2015, and has been used at the end of the season by both drivers.
Renault (ex Lotus): Have officially confirmed their return to F1 as a works team and not just a supplier of engines. In doing such they will inform the public more in depth next month.
Important info carried over from 2015 thread for 2016 season
IT'S HAPPENING! IT'S HAPPENING! O_O
http://www.racer.com/f1/item/123174-force-india-set-for-aston-martin-deal
Pinch me I'm dreaming!
I'll probably be setting up the new thread soon after Abu or perhaps before, since most of the stuff we're seeing on the cars is now geared for next year. All I planned to do (when semester and season is over) is break down the cars, and with you guys see what actually put certain teams above others, outside of money and engines and drivers for the most part.
Before that happens let's talk about the Merc design that we saw in Brazil FP, where it had the cool looking hood scoop like s-duct that was in fact not a functioning s-duct at all. Rather it was Mercedes looking to use a higher chassis based car next year and thus improve on air flow under the car to reap those benefits and become even faster. I'm sure if they wanted they could also make an s-duct as well to look like that, but the point is that it wasn't to take over the top properties of the car.
http://www.formula1.com/content/fom...15/11/analysis---mercedes-mystery-s-duct.html
The two issues are linked, and it seems that by resolving one, the other was in jeopardy and vice versa:
http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2015/...t-takeover-of-lotus-set-for-positive-outcome/
Announcement expected some time this week.
Some basic info that is widely available;
- Tag Heuer is not TAG Group.
- TAG (Techniques d'Avant Garde) is Mansour Ojjeh's company.
- He is a long time shareholder of McLaren.
- Main businesses are corporate investments and aviation services.
- Bought Heuer in the 80s and turned the company around under the new name of Tag Heuer. Sold it in 2000(?) to Louis Vuitton.
- Funded (but critically has no role in) the development of a Porsche engine for McLaren.
- Tag Heuer is not a new engine manufacturer, this is just 'badge engineering', as is the proposed Aston Martin (Mercedes) deal with SFI.
- Ojjeh/TAG is rumoured to be looking to sell his shares in McLaren. What that might or might not lead to is anyone's guess.
Attachments
Last edited: