IcySlivers
(Banned)
- 148
- United States
I really like Alonso at Aston Martin
Seems like a good fit.
Seems like a good fit.
I think with Alonso's talent and experience and Papa Stroll's finances on paper it could be a great match. Given that both are strong personalities though it could be the reverse. Time will tell. I do want AM to do well as they're an iconic name in motorsport but given past form I'm not hugely optimistic. Would love to be proven wrong though!I really like Alonso at Aston Martin
Seems like a good fit.
Audi entered the chatI don’t think the prestige of driving for Aston Martin will last long.
As Aston Martin Triples Loss, Survival Might Require A Takeover
Troubled luxury sports car maker Aston Martin tripled losses in the first half and hopes a cash injection might end financial worries were seen as inadequate and a takeover might be required to guarantee survival.www.forbes.com
Although AML doesn't own AMF1, it does have something to do with it: Lawrence Stroll owns both - the former after the latter.Aston Martin Lagonda from Gaydon doesn't have anything to do with Aston Martin F1 from Silverstone.
No but Lawrence Strolls pockets are consistent between the pair and whilst Audi wouldn't buy anything from AML, a cash injection from them purchasing AMF1 would line Strolls pockets nicely to help AML.Aston Martin Lagonda from Gaydon doesn't have anything to do with Aston Martin F1 from Silverstone. Mercedes also holds 11% (planned 20% until 2023) of AML and Stroll holds 22%. But buying AML won't give you anything from AMF1.
Forgot about Andretti. They have the money for a whole new entry so a team purchase would be chump change for them.There’s also the Andretti family itching to buy a team. Stroll would have no issue selling.
As for Daniel, he has been is one my favourite drivers over the years so this just sucks to see. He still deserves a seat in F1, I’m sure he will be cheap-ish to employ now.
I've been seeing some reports that German media have been speculating on his future at Haas. I hope he isn't dropped as this is his first proper rookie season given he couldn't do much last year other than learn the tracks given how much slower Mazepin was than him and how uncompetitive the car was. I don't think this year has been any rockier than Tsunoda's first season was at AT.. I think if Mick does move from Haas it will be his own choice. If Danny Ric doesn't go back to Alpine then he'd make a good teammate for Ocon. Crazy theory time - I also wonder if jumping ship to RB may be on the cards is Gasly goes to Alpine. Seems Porsche are likely to enter in 2026 and so it would be a coup to have a German driver for the Red Pull/Porsche team up - they could put him in the AT until '26 then move him up.Possibly just click-baiting, but I've seen a couple of videos suggesting Schumacher may be out of a seat at Haas. Could add a little more fuel to the fire. Haas isn't exactly a prime seat, but a seat nonetheless. I won't lie...in my heart...something about Ricciardo and Steiner together would make my favourite team...
It wouldn't be Haas dropping Schumacher, it would be Ferrari dropping Schumacher (and with that ending their agreement with Haas to loan him out to them). Which is perfectly justified since Schumacher is obviously never going to become a Ferrari driver. They already have two great young drivers and if/when they lose one of them there are plenty of better options than promoting Schumacher.I personally have a hard time seeing the justification of dropping Schumacher at Haas. He's finally starting to come to grips with the car (his qualifying still needs work), and that one of his personal sponsors is also, as far as I'm aware, one of the main sources of income coming to Haas. With that, I have an even harder time seeing Ricciardo going to Haas, as it would be a major step back performance-wise from Alpine.
I agree. I think Schumacher not being that much younger than Leclerc and Sainz shows that he's unlikely to ever get that seat. I also think, given Ferrari will never change it seems, that driving for Ferrari isn't the coup it once was so he'd be wise to look elsewhere due to both factors., It wouldn't be Haas dropping Schumacher, it would be Ferrari dropping Schumacher (and with that ending their agreement with Haas to loan him out to them). Which is perfectly justified since Schumacher is obviously never going to become a Ferrari driver. They already have two great young drivers and if/when they lose one of them there are plenty of better options than promoting Schumacher.
To be fair, it's his first proper season. I think his surname puts a lot of pressure on him. I mean, to use a music analogy, Jakob Dylan's not one of the all time greats like his father but that doesn't mean he's not a really talented songwriter and musician. Tsunoda's first season seemed rockier than Mick's and Oliver Solberg's time in the WRC hasn't been astounding. I'd be amazed if he weren't picked up by a team - even if it's someone like Williams. Thinking about it, Mick wouldn't be a bad shout for Williams as a replacement for Latifi, given he also comes with big sponsorship money but has more potential than Latifi (IMO anyway).Schumacher has been mediocre.
Yeah, there are other series out there. That being said, K Mag gave up a WEC drive to come back to Haas so F1 does have some pull obviously. However, in one of the podcasts from The Race they speculated that Ricciardo's driving style may just not be suited to the current gen cars in general, in which case he'd be wise to go elsewhere. I agree the WEC is the place to be as they've already got more constructors interested than there are in F1 (by which I mean full on constructors like Mercedes, Ferrari and Alpine). I'm really looking forward to the resurgence of Le Mans!That was just my amusing conjecture, I don't imagine he'd end up at Haas unless he was absolutely dying to drive F1 at any cost (unlikely). Ricciardo should be investing time in Hypercar/LMH etc. since that is about to take off like crazy.
Possibly just click-baiting, but I've seen a couple of videos suggesting Schumacher may be out of a seat at Haas. Could add a little more fuel to the fire. Haas isn't exactly a prime seat, but a seat nonetheless. I won't lie...in my heart...something about Ricciardo and Steiner together would make my favourite team...
Danny Ric would go to LMDh cars in the WEC before he went to Haas. I reckon Alpine will be his top target, likewise him for them. Gasly will be their second choice should Ricciardo fall through.My understanding is that Alonso's move to AM essentially put an end to Haas' negotiations with Mick (as he was tipped to be looking at the AM seat, but now his only bargaining chip is gone). So he has to prove himself in the second half of the season to keep his seat.
That said, Danny Ric would be a good fit at Haas as he is super popular in the US
Ricciardo is possibly more likely to be running a Haas car in NASCAR than he is to run one in F1.Danny Ric would go to LMDh cars in the WEC before he went to Haas. I reckon Alpine will be his top target, likewise him for them. Gasly will be their second choice should Ricciardo fall through.
It’s not, driving a **** box is not excuse to write off that season.To be fair, it's his first proper season.
It’s not, driving a **** box is not excuse to write off that season.
Already forgot how George binned it in Spa, without any pressure behind the safety car in Imola and at least collided with Bottas? Also he was three years in the Williams. His outing in the Merc at Bahrain was nice but also on a track with 4 corners. He also didn't have any notable teammate. Also he didn't had a regulation change in this 3 years. Still with this logic Mick should still have 1.5 seasons to prove himself. He binned the Haas yes but just look at the Leclerc and Sainz binning the Ferrari multiple times this year.I concede that the same could be said of Russell’s start at Williams and he had no issues getting in a Mercedes and completely dominating on track when he sat in for Hamilton so it’s fair to say that Mick does have some issues and has had difficulty adjusting to ‘proper’ F1 racing.
Already forgot how George binned it in Spa
Now, well-placed sources at Alpine have told RacingNews365.com that Piastri never held a Formula 1 contract with the team.
Piastri had signed a contract with Alpine in November 2021, which contained a clause outlining the team’s obligations towards Piastri.
These obligations included giving Piastri a certain number of test kilometres in an F1 car, which RacingNews365.com understands is in excess of 3,500km, along with paying his expenses and making him Alpine's reserve driver in 2022.
If Alpine fulfilled these obligations, an option existed for the team to place Piastri in a race seat for 2023.
Crucially, however, this contract was between Piastri and Alpine's Driver Academy, rather than the F1 team.
This meant the contract was never registered with Formula 1's Contract Recognition Board, as it was not a F1 contract.
Accordingly, when McLaren lodged their contract with Piastri with the CRB after signing the Australian, neither Alpine nor McLaren received any notification from the CRB of any conflict.