33 pic Photoshoot: 1972 Dodge Charger Air Grabber

  • Thread starter Cano
  • 16 comments
  • 8,051 views

Cano

Premium
20,758
Mexico
Cephiro
I was one of the initial proposers of this Subforum and had not posted anything, so I apologize, but sorting trough 2gb for each photoshoot takes time, and I had had some photoshop work for the mags.

but finally, here I am; I'm not going to make one post, but a post for each photoshoot because there will be like 35 pictures of each car in each post; 'sides, it will add volume and will allow for better feedback.

That said, I present this 1972 Dodge Charger that appeared in Maxi Tuning Mexico (:crazy:) a few months ago; as I know the details of each car because I also wrote each feature, I'll also tell someting about each car. This is not my first photoshoot but it was in my HDD so it came first into editing, I'll soon post some of my first jobs, so you can see the difference.

I used a Canon XTI with an array of lenses, ranging from the basic 18-55, a 28-105 and the huge 75-300, and also a el cheapo wide angle that came with the pack, all of it with a tripod (I always use a tripod because I have a really bad pulse).

Every picture is available should someone want it,and also don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions about any shot.

The guy has had the car since 1976 and was his daily driver for 25+ years before having to relegeate it to weekend car status due to gas costs; that's when he repainted it in candy apple red (original was metallic turqoise) and addded the front disc brakes.

IMG_6318.jpg


IMG_6453.jpg


IMG_6123.jpg


IMG_6174.jpg


IMG_6147.jpg


IMG_6186.jpg


IMG_6411.jpg


The engine is a stock 318 ci V8 (very slow) with headers, but a friend gave him the air grabber hood from a US Charger (mexican cars never had it) that he had found in a junkyard but it did not have the vacuum sistem that activated it, so he homemade his own, wich I tought was really cool and adds some interest to the otherwise plane-jane powerplant.

IMG_6017.jpg


IMG_5942.jpg


IMG_5931.jpg


IMG_6393.jpg


Suspension is stock save for sway bars and the afore-mentioned disc brakes; wheels are fake Cragars but have original center caps so they really look the part, but I know my wheels well; 9.5 inch wide rubber all around.

IMG_6429.jpg


The interior has been reupholstered in black vinil; man I love those seats, the pattern is awesome. Steering wheel is stock but a Mopar Tach resides where the mexican model had a clock; also, the slapstick shifter now slaps the 727 auto trans; it has an illuminated button that read "air grabber" when the hood hole is opened, but one of the lights was out so no picture.

IMG_6556.jpg


IMG_6562.jpg


IMG_6610.jpg


IMG_6607.jpg


Random details and rolling car-to-car shots, even with the stock 318 it still peeled away; the exhaust tips are the original 72 items.

IMG_6514.jpg


IMG_6530.jpg


IMG_6547.jpg


IMG_6054.jpg


IMG_6057.jpg


IMG_6165.jpg


IMG_6225.jpg


IMG_6255.jpg


IMG_6273.jpg


IMG_6450.jpg


IMG_6381.jpg


Now, let me tell you, my Wife Aura also goes with me and shoots the cars with our Canon S2, she has a more artistic eye than me so the contrast in our shots are pretty stark, but she has a pretty good eye; she also photograps me when I'm working :D the next few shots are by her, comments please.

jgkdbh025.jpg


jgkdbh029.jpg


jgkdbh073.jpg


jgkdbh085.jpg


jgkdbh093.jpg

:D
jgkdbh067.jpg


there it goes. Please a lot of comments and feedback and everything else. I'll post more once I have time to sort through the shoots I have here, any questions also welcome (:
 
You're seeing the car, and she's seeing a thing. Consequently, the car stuff in your shots is great, but the photographic composition of hers is better. She uses lines much better than you, for example.

What does "no tirar basura" mean?

Lots of good shots though.
 
You're seeing the car, and she's seeing a thing. Consequently, the car stuff in your shots is great, but the photographic composition of hers is better. She uses lines much better than you, for example.

What does "no tirar basura" mean?

Lots of good shots though.

No means no, basura means trash. I'm guessing no littering or something to that effect.

edit: Google confirms
http://www.google.com/ig?hl=en&referrer=ign

The first seven shots are plain awesome. 👍
 
Also, I think the vignetting on the close-ups hurts the image. Maybe you should take those kinds of shots and then take the same shot further away so that you can crop out the vignetting.
 
I wish you shot them all at 5:30am! The first two are absolutely stunning, but the mid-day lighting just doesn't make the photos pop like that low light source. Any reason for waiting for noon to shoot some of them (other than noon is after morning)?
 
I wish you shot them all at 5:30am! The first two are absolutely stunning, but the mid-day lighting just doesn't make the photos pop like that low light source. Any reason for waiting for noon to shoot some of them (other than noon is after morning)?

It's not his car, bro!
 
I wish you shot them all at 5:30am! The first two are absolutely stunning, but the mid-day lighting just doesn't make the photos pop like that low light source. Any reason for waiting for noon to shoot some of them (other than noon is after morning)?


Basically, yes, because it's not mine; that was shot a friday and that day I had to work; now, I work from 6:00 am to 1:00 pm on a media monitoring company because I need the extra cash; problem is, the owner of the Charger is a musician that plays at a night club, so he had to go away at about 6:00 pm. that only let us with the option of mid-noon, and it was an emergency session, there was no muscle car for that month's issue, so that was the only thing we could muster; I would have loved to wait for about 6:00 pm to shoot it but he had to go... the light of the driving shots would have been even better, but oh well.

We normally shoot cars at dawn (precisely, I have to shoot a riced-out civic tomorrow at 6:30 am, I dont know what am I doing here writing) or late in the afternoon, its always that way because light makes or breaks a car picture, so we always try to get the lowest, thinnest light possible, but in this case it was impossible.That's the only thing I really hate about it, but hey, no one's complaining.
 
Also, I think the vignetting on the close-ups hurts the image. Maybe you should take those kinds of shots and then take the same shot further away so that you can crop out the vignetting.

sorry dude, I don't get your comment, what would vignetting be in this case? :dunce:
 
You're seeing the car, and she's seeing a thing. Consequently, the car stuff in your shots is great, but the photographic composition of hers is better. She uses lines much better than you, for example.

What does "no tirar basura" mean?

Lots of good shots though.

That's precisely the point, she doesn't look at the car as the subject, but as another element to compose a picture with; I'm not that good at that because after all, it's a car mag and car mag photography is my job, so even if my pictures are well taken, they are technical and, as you said, automotive. Her shots are more artistic because she looks for an aesthetic composition regardless of the car, she doesnt know what an airgrabber is, but she does know what looks good and what doesnt, and that's good because we compliment each other well.

some of her pictures get published and some not, but it also depends on the type of mag; in Maxi, for example, her shots arent published as often, but in "Motor Clasico", a classic car magazine, her shots share about 50 percent of the space with mine because they apreciate way more an artsy shot; I'll show some of the work we did for that one soon.

she's very good and enjoys photography, we plan on having her study it as a career, with my contacts on the biggest editorial in Mexico, she might be full swing soon.
 
I think he means the cut corners on the wide-angle shots. Not really lens vignetting, but still dark corners that can be cropped out.

Isn't that still vignetting? Looks like a really big filter lip blocked out the image.
 
Superb photos from both you and your wife my friend. REally inspiring stuff! I get my camera(s) back from Canon tomorrow so will have to get out and try shoot some of my own.
 
Thanks man! You should get the owner of that white Ferrari (you owe me some pics BTW) to let you do a shoot of that car, its real fun.

I’ll be snapping a 1968 Barracuda from the same owner this weekend, hope it comes out well.
 
Wow, that is a VERY nice car, and you've shot it very well! The only minor niggles that I'm seeing are the blurred edges on some of the interior shots, I'm guessing due to lens distortion at a wide angle.

The close ups of the paint are really showing the swirls though, he should be looking after it better than that really... :(

Also would it be possible to get larger sizes of 2,3 and 7 to use as desktop wallpapers please?

EDIT: BTW what is an Airgrabber?
 
Yes the distortion is due to the Wide Angle, a cheap one at that, but I really like to use it and since the interior pics are printed in more or less small sized it isn’t as offensive when you see them in the magazine, that’s why I don’t hesitate to use it.

The car is nice (but not fast) and the paint shows its age, come on, its around 17 years old!! It is QUITE good if you take that in consideration, hahaha

What size do you want the pics? I’ll provide them.

Air grabber: the hood scoop that opens via a vacuum system with a pull in the dash, if you want fresh air directly in your air cleaner, you open it… it’s the small thing with a bee that says “Ram Charger” in the pics, take a look at the downside of the hood in the engine compartment pic to see how it works.
 
Back