GTPNewsWire
Contributing Writer
- 22,121
- GTPHQ
This is the discussion thread for a recent post on GTPlanet:
This article was published by Joe Donaldson (@Joey D) on February 7th, 2018 in the Car Culture category.
You can tell build quality came second, or third, or fifteenth on the list of important matters. You could lose a toddler through some of the panel gaps
You can tell build quality came second, or third, or fifteenth on the list of important matters. You could lose a toddler through some of the panel gaps
What are you talking about? Safety wasn't a concern when people drove cars like this. The idea was to drive as fast as you dared without getting caught by the law or writing off your mum and dads car. Toddlers weren't even an issue ...boy racer special - to be found at traffic lights next to a Ferrari or Renault GT Turbo Giordini
They were S-class price when new. I doubt many boy-racers could afford them.
S class price? They were all sold at a loss just to make up the 200 units necessary. It's a homologo' special I never actually seen one exactly like the picture on the road in the UK. Seen plenty of MG GRB V6 Turbos and countless Renault 5 GT Turbo's with full rally kits roll cages and suspension etc. There was a lot of money about in the 80's and 90's if you could get someone to underwrite the insurance you were all good... Most people couldn't drive a 205 GTI (standard) until they were 25 unless their parents cosigned insurance (a girl I went to school with drove her mums). There is a lot of waff talked about cars lol ...I was alive and kicking at this interesting period... If one was to go up for sale now its possible it could go for £250.000 All the necessary prerequisites are to be found here ...https://rallygroupbshrine.org/the-g...t-205-t16-e1e2-homologation-version/#205t16hv
Do you know what it was when it was new? I looked all over Tuesday night and couldn't find any price other than an estimated $60,000...which seemed high.
Do you know what it was when it was new? I looked all over Tuesday night and couldn't find any price other than an estimated $60,000...which seemed high.
homologo'
I have to wonder...are these accepted, common-use abbreviations--I'm particularly curious about that first one; so much that I looked it up and found no English usage, and extra-English usage was not applicable to the context--or is it just that difficult to write out "homologation?""Homo' "
I have to wonder...are these accepted, common-use abbreviations--I'm particularly curious about that first one; so much that I looked it up and found no English usage, and extra-English usage was not applicable to the context--or is it just that difficult to write out "homologation?"
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I caught that...[Insert my post here.]
I have, and that's why I asked if those were accepted terminology. They struck me as contrived--and even a bit derogatory (more the case for the latter "homo," for obvious reasons)--and the intent has an impact on how the comment is interpreted.have you heard of slang or dialects?
Do you know what it was when it was new? I looked all over Tuesday night and couldn't find any price other than an estimated $60,000...which seemed high.
The images in the article are those provided by Motostalgia, who is responsible for the auction.The OP should change all of the pictures... because the ones he used are of no ordinary 205 T16, hence why it looks "off" to most of you guys.
The images in the article are those provided by Motostalgia, who is responsible for the auction.
Then acknowledge that point by advising the information in the article be changed or supplemented to reflect that of the car pictured and being auctioned, rather than saying the pictures should be changed.I know... but the OP talks about this car as if it was a normal homologation Peugeot 205 Turbo 16. It isn't and that's my point!
Then acknowledge that point by advising the information in the article be changed or supplemented to reflect that of the car pictured and being auctioned, rather than saying the pictures should be changed.