Tires or Tracks? Why Not Both, With This Shapeshifting Wheel From the US Military

It seems the military is watching alot of Speed Racer

speed-racer-mach-gogogo-caps_tb_env_gly_41.jpg
 
Do you really want the motors for your armoured vehicle to be in the wheel?
 
Do you really want the motors for your armoured vehicle to be in the wheel?

It's the solution for many autonomous field drones - it requires less space in the main 'body' and they're easier to change/service. Providing that they're built to withstand the same (or greater) level of aggressive strike as a standard wheel then it shouldn't be a problem. Designers might argue that one disabled wheel still leaves three 'engines' intact with no shock transmitted through their drivelines.
 
So, one shot in this wheel will disable the whole vehicle? I am not an expert, but it sounds not practical, what's the difference from the basic tires then?. Buggy with active suspension is pretty interesting, but I was much impressed when Bose invented this in mid 90-s.

 
So, one shot in this wheel will disable the whole vehicle? I am not an expert, but it sounds not practical, what's the difference from the basic tires then?. Buggy with active suspension is pretty interesting, but I was much impressed when Bose invented this in mid 90-s.


That car moving without any body roll is absolutely freaky.
 
I can't stop watching it change from one form to the other. It's mesmerisingly weird.
So, one shot in this wheel will disable the whole vehicle?
Why? It has three others...
 
Yes, but what's the difference from the basic tires? Apart from x100 price.
These convert into tracks. Tracks are better for extreme terrain, particularly if it's loose like sand or exceptionally soggy. But tracks suck for road use and vehicle dynamics, so they convert into regular, rotating wheels.
 
These convert into tracks. Tracks are better for extreme terrain, particularly if it's loose like sand or exceptionally soggy. But tracks suck for road use and vehicle dynamics, so they convert into regular, rotating wheels.

Presumably when it's in wheel mode it's not nearly as good a tire though still, because it looks like it's more like a circular track than a tire. I bet that's a rough ride, limiting top speed.

Super cool anyway.
 
Do you really want the motors for your armoured vehicle to be in the wheel?
Yes and with some jumping jacks

So, one shot in this wheel will disable the whole vehicle? I am not an expert, but it sounds not practical, what's the difference from the basic tires then?. Buggy with active suspension is pretty interesting, but I was much impressed when Bose invented this in mid 90-s.



That car just jumped without a ramp what kind of sorcery is this?
 
Last edited:
While this may be developed for military use, I can't help but think that this technology would/will be incredibly useful for mountain rescue missions as well as getting first responders to remote locations during winter months.
 
It's crazy that modern cars with tons of electronics still use McPherson suspension as the best option, it's already 70 years old!

Because it's effective and affordable, and the technology has been refined substantially. Audi has a car that lifts one side to protect passenger in a side-impact, and pretty much any luxury or performance vehicle these days has some sort of magnetic ride control, so the general idea is working it's way into the market. Even the Ford Fusion Sport uses active suspension to reduce pothole impacts.

They said in the video that the tech is extremely heavy and expensive, so it was really more of a tech demo than anything. Manufacturers are finding other ways to achieve similar(albeit less perfect) results without sacrificing cost or weight.

The tech in this video is likely also heavy and expensive enough that it'd probably fail if it were sold to regular consumers, but it serves a purpose for the military so it doesn't really matter what the price tag is as long as it gets the job done. Just like most military devolpments, it currently only exists for military use(and may trickle down to emergency services as @Northstar suggested), but man is it fun to watch it in action.
 
Because it's effective and affordable, and the technology has been refined substantially. Audi has a car that lifts one side to protect passenger in a side-impact, and pretty much any luxury or performance vehicle these days has some sort of magnetic ride control, so the general idea is working it's way into the market. Even the Ford Fusion Sport uses active suspension to reduce pothole impacts.
.

Auto-industry is fully driven by marketing teams, would the most of the major manufacturers go full-electric if Tesla wouldn't sell that good? No need to say, that Musk didn't care about marketing and just provided his own thinking because he has enough assets for it.

They said in the video that the tech is extremely heavy and expensive, so it was really more of a tech demo than anything. Manufacturers are finding other ways to achieve similar(albeit less perfect) results without sacrificing cost or weight.

I guess it's not bad to sacrifice the cost and weight, isn't it? It was expensive 2 decades ago, if automakers would be interested, they would buy this technology and today it would be used in Ford Focus.
 
Auto-industry is fully driven by marketing teams, would the most of the major manufacturers go full-electric if Tesla wouldn't sell that good? No need to say, that Musk didn't care about marketing and just provided his own thinking because he has enough assets for it.

Full electric cars were a considerable and important step forward in the auto industry and it was only a matter of time before someone doubled down on their development. So not really the same kind of importance as more comfier suspension.

The only people who know how that suspension works in detail are the people working for Bose. The fact that they're still talking about it so many years later makes me think they're still working on it, but they've deemed it too expensive and heavy for the consumer market as it stands. There could be a number of things that make the suspension impractical aside from what they said, like energy storage and generation(electromagnets of that size are pretty power hungry, and you can only recapture so much of it), reliability, durability, ease of maintenance, etc. The people creating the very suspension you're talking about are the ones who would know best whether or not it's viable, so if you can't take their word for it I don't know what else to tell you.
 
That was some impressive technology on display. Wonder if it will ever be domesticated... ;)

On the electric suspension, there is now a system in several cars that uses ferrous particles that can be activated or deactivated as needed to stiffen or soften the suspension.

Not quite jump-the-board stuff, but it's a lot closer than it used to be!
 
Last edited:
Back