GTPNewsWire
Contributing Writer
- 21,814
- GTPHQ
This is the discussion thread for a recent post on GTPlanet:
This article was published by Michael Leary (@Terronium-12) on January 21st, 2019 in the Forza Horizon 4 category.
I'm just curious as to how a dance can be considered copyrighted property, and how to actively enforce said copyright.
Just like these other performers, Horning does not own the copyright to his dance — a very important and difficult step in claiming ownership — but has filed for it.
Jackson family suing would make more sense than whatever this is because that is actually an individual dance routine created for that song. The Carlton is likely just some stupid random cheesy dance he did on the spot to fill a roll. All this looks like is a cheap way to try to make a buck.The dances in question aren't even copyrighted by those who are trying to sue:
Jackson family suing would make more sense than whatever this is because that is actually an individual dance routine created for that song. The Carlton is likely just some stupid random cheesy dance he did on the spot to fill a roll. All this looks like is a cheap way to try to make a buck.
Horning was asked by TMZ whether or not he thought he should get anything from having his dance in the game and he replied, “it’s not that big of a deal, I’m just glad it’s in the game.”
I'm just curious as to how a dance can be considered copyrighted property, and how to actively enforce said copyright.
That'd be like the Jackson estate suing someone every time they do the dance from Thriller.
WARNING: I am not a lawyer.except like you said, I'm not sure how anybody can copyright a dance move.
I don't understand how an actor on a TV show can lay claim to a copyright claim on a dance that was performed as part of a television show.
If I work for a company and design a new product while working for that company, using company materials and time, my company would let me know that the product belongs to them, even if it was solely my idea.
In this case, I believe he claimed the dance was improv and not part of the script. So the performance itself is, technically, his intellectual property.
The issue with Fortnite is both the monetization of the dance and the fact that they specifically copied his original performance.
This would most likely be written into your employment contract.
In this case, I believe he claimed the dance was improv and not part of the script. So the performance itself is, technically, his intellectual property.
The issue with Fortnite is both the monetization of the dance and the fact that they specifically copied his original performance.
This would most likely be written into your employment contract.
What's to stop Ribeiro from demanding compensation for the dance in any episode it shows up on, now that the show is in syndication?
I've never heard any legal argument that the origin of the performance affects the legality of who owns it.
Destiny 2, which also has the Carlton dance but is far less successful than Fortnite, never got sued.
He can say what he likes, but the fact is he stole it from Courtney Cox from the Bruce Springsteen video she was in. So she should sue him. Lets not forget he got his big break by impersonating Micheal Jackson.Ribeiro has previously, publicly admitted that he got the Carlton dance idea from a friend of his.
.
No real loss there, they can take the dab as well while they're at it.
Mind you, this decision is concerning in of itself, making the subject of this video, a very real and scary reality for racing gamers.
Skip to 11:21 for my main point.
I don't understand how an actor on a TV show can lay claim to a copyright claim on a dance that was performed as part of a television show. Isn't the ownership of said dance the property of the shows creators?
Literally every Sonic game released on the Genesis had problems with music rights because of the terms of how the music was created and the music not actually belonging to Sega. There were a couple indie games a year or so ago that had one of the musicians go through a (ultimately lost, but not at all thrown out) year long legal dispute with the game developers. Sometimes composers have retained the rights to music they've created for something and they use that music for something else (Stewart Copeland used music from the Spyro games in other things he worked on, Rollercoaster Tycoon music was also used in Driver, etc.). The legality of who owns characters who appear in comic books has also caused problems in the pastBut script aside, wouldn't something done by a character on a show, be owned by the show? What's to stop Ribeiro from demanding compensation for the dance in any episode it shows up on, now that the show is in syndication? If the show doesn't own the dance, I don't see why he couldn't. Actors improvise in TV shows and movies all the time, and I've never heard any legal argument that the origin of the performance affects the legality of who owns it.
A moment's silence please
Just curious btw... what happens to people (not me) who had Carlton or Floss enabled? Does their avatar just stand around instead, scratching his or her arse or something?
Stuff like that is determined by how the employment contract is written and is not at all automatic, and considering Ribeiro almost certainly gets royalties from The Fresh Prince anyway he wouldn't be apt to sue NBC based on the episodes of the show itself using the dance.
Unless he already gets it. Being one of the most recognizable elements of the show and frequently used in advertising for syndication, it's entirely possible that that is something that was worked out by him with NBC.If the show has additional IP in it that isn't owned by them, he'd be 100% within his rights to sue for additional compensation.
That's a fair enough view, but considering a good portion of the additional stuff I've seen that Epic sells is deliberately as close to copyrighted material as possible so its obvious what it is supposed to be but without Epic having to pay anything, I can't agree.I hope he goes down in flames, and gets hit with court costs for Epic.
That's a fair enough view, but considering a good portion of the additional stuff I've seen that Epic sells is deliberately as close to copyrighted material as possible so its obvious what it is supposed to be but without Epic having to pay anything, I can't agree.
It's actually worse than that.Jackson family suing would make more sense than whatever this is because that is actually an individual dance routine created for that song. The Carlton is likely just some stupid random cheesy dance he did on the spot to fill a roll. All this looks like is a cheap way to try to make a buck.