GTPNewsWire
Contributing Writer
- 21,957
- GTPHQ
This is the discussion thread for a recent post on GTPlanet:
This article was published by Andrew Evans (@Famine) on February 18th, 2019 in the Formula One category.
I just do not see it. Ferrari are coming into this year with a new secondary driver, who is proven just one who will not consistently finish up front and come time to help his team mate in the latter part of the season will need to consistently be up there. Also add the fact that a new team principal is there. I could be wrong and Ferrari bandaged up all wounds from last year and LeClerc will be right up there adding with solid constructor points.This is the discussion thread for a recent post on GTPlanet:
This article was published by Andrew Evans (@Famine) on February 18th, 2019 in the Formula One category.
I just do not see it. Ferrari are coming into this year with a new secondary driver, who is proven just one who will not consistently finish up front and come time to help his team mate in the latter part of the season will need to consistently be up there. Also add the fact that a new team principal is there. I could be wrong and Ferrari bandaged up all wounds from last year and LeClerc will be right up there adding with solid constructor points.
I'm not expecting to be entirely correct - it's more a bit of fun with a bit of reasoning behind it. You might have different reasoning, and that's cool too...I think they are underselling the progress Honda made last year (and likely during the off season). I wouldn't be surprised if they are on par with Renault for power, if not ahead. The Sauber was also the 4th fastest car at several venues last year, so 8th seems a bit pessimistic...
I'm not expecting to be entirely correct - it's more a bit of fun with a bit of reasoning behind it. You might have different reasoning, and that's cool too...
... but won't it be neat if I am right?
Doubt they'll be challenging the big three but just hoping to see some more improvement out of the factory Renault's. Looks like it's going to be a really good mid pack battle this year.
I'm operating under the assumption it is better to do well in testing rather than do poorly. So far, Ferrari has separated itself at the front, and Williams separated from the back. But I'm looking for a good scramble from 2nd to 9th, with a lot depending on the engines, particularly Honda and Renault being a bit behind. Haas is looking strong, but will Grosjean ever find his mental and nervous comfort zone?
For the 2nd day of the testing at Barcelona, it looks like Ferrari with Leclerc driving, is again clearly fastest and leading in laps accomplished. An auspicious start for them. At this moment, cars with Ferrari power are next in lap times.
Did you read the full sentence? Only it didn't say that.Reading people's predictions for the season is fun. Reading the same wrong things people write about Haas is not. '2018 Haas was a 2017 Ferrari' is not accurate
It's worth noting that Magnussen may currently only have two penalty points (which isn't the fewest - two of last year's drivers have no points [Hamilton, Leclerc], as does 2017 Sauber driver Giovinazzi), but he has the second-most expired points of any driver on the grid at 14. The only current driver with more expired points is Kvyat.Your point about KMag is puzzling, he has the fewest penalty points, along with Ricciardo and Kimi, of any of the drivers. Wrongly deserved, media-driven reputation aside, he hasn't drawn the ire of the stewards much. Grosjean has though, he and Max are at the top of the list.
Yep, I think they suck so hard and hate them so much that I predicted they'd finish 4th...I understand that people have some sort of issue with Haas
I'm not expecting to be entirely correct - it's more a bit of fun with a bit of reasoning behind it. You might have different reasoning, and that's cool too...
... but won't it be neat if I am right?