GTPNewsWire
Contributing Writer
- 21,618
- GTPHQ
This is the discussion thread for a recent post on GTPlanet:
This article was published by Andrew Evans (@Famine) on October 2nd, 2019 in the Motorsports category.
TCR needs it's its own category. FWD cars don't belong in Gr4.PD? Please? I'm a die-hard Zoom-Zoom guy, and this thing would be perfect in Gr.4!
No argument, but not holding my breath.TCR needs it's its own category. FWD cars don't belong in Gr4.
I'm surprised a bit that they choose this chassis and not the 4door, however I'm sure they know what and why. Looks nice (and that's the main question, as it will be BoP-ped to match the others ).
Even tho GR.4 has FWD cars and the megane was one of the best cars for a quite long time?TCR needs it's its own category. FWD cars don't belong in Gr4.
YesEven tho GR.4 has FWD cars and the megane was one of the best cars for a quite long time?
It was inevitable.*Looks at forum sub-section*
Huh, this isn't a gaming thread.
Audi and Subaru are sedans as well...although I don’t think the Subaru is being used anymore. The longer wheel base and better aerodynamics of the sedan cars give them an advantage on fast, high speed circuits, but they tend to struggle on tighter, more technical tracks.The majority of TCR cars are hatches plus they need all the help they can get selling the 3 hatchback in North America where this thing seems like it’ll mostly race.
At least when it’s a race car horrible rear visibility isn’t a concern
Audi and Subaru are sedans as well...although I don’t think the Subaru is being used anymore. The longer wheel base and better aerodynamics of the sedan cars give them an advantage on fast, high speed circuits, but they tend to struggle on tighter, more technical tracks.
Just because something is somewhere doesn't mean it's supposed to be.Even tho GR.4 has FWD cars and the megane was one of the best cars for a quite long time?
Just to be clear i agree with but you know GR.4 is a mess.Yes
It was inevitable.
CorrectJust because something is somewhere doesn't mean it's supposed to be.
*cough*BOP*cough*Lynk & Co as well, which seems to struggle in a straight line while also being big and heavy, yet still manages to win a lot of races
It's a 5 door hatch, not 3. And as TCR goes quite worldwide, nothing will stop it to run in Europe, Asia, etc. also.The majority of TCR cars are hatches plus they need all the help they can get selling the 3 hatchback in North America where this thing seems like it’ll mostly race.
That's obviously not, but better and easier (cheaper) achievable aero and balance surely is.At least when it’s a race car horrible rear visibility isn’t a concern
It's the five-door hatch of the 3, as opposed to the four-door fastback/saloon.It's a 5 door hatch, not 3.
What do you mean by “better and easier achievable (cheaper) aero?”It's a 5 door hatch, not 3. And as TCR goes quite worldwide, nothing will stop it to run in Europe, Asia, etc. also.
That's obviously not, but better and easier (cheaper) achievable aero and balance surely is.
PD? Please? I'm a die-hard Zoom-Zoom guy, and this thing would be perfect in Gr.4! I'd also love to see a hotter 3 hatch for sale- I know I would be a customer.
TCR needs it's its own category. FWD cars don't belong in Gr4.
Now, if only GTSport would get this car in game somehow. Hmmmmmmmm
Of course; my mistake. I associated the "3" as 3 door initially, not as the model.It's the five-door hatch of the 3, as opposed to the four-door fastback/saloon.
I heard a lot in TCR Europe and WTCR that a 4 door saloon is more optimal to start with than a hatchback. Easier to make the aero work, and have a better balance from scratch. However, it is obviously not impossible to achieve the goals with a hatchback, as we can see on several models, but as I treated those arguments as facts, I supposed to pick the 4door version - if it is available. The marketing factor is also in play though, for sure.What do you mean by “better and easier achievable (cheaper) aero?”
Ok, I get what you mean. It’s true that the saloon cars have better aero dynamics because of the air flow off the rear of the car, there’s less turbulence which results in higher top speeds. Not sure about it being easier to achieve handling balance with one body type or the other though.Of course; my mistake. I associated the "3" as 3 door initially, not as the model.
I heard a lot in TCR Europe and WTCR that a 4 door saloon is more optimal to start with than a hatchback. Easier to make the aero work, and have a better balance from scratch. However, it is obviously not impossible to achieve the goals with a hatchback, as we can see on several models, but as I treated those arguments as facts, I supposed to pick the 4door version - if it is available. The marketing factor is also in play though, for sure.
Edit: as I can recall, the models devastated WTCC, later WTCR for long time: Chevy Cruze, Citroen C-Elysée, now Link&Co; 4 door saloons.
Kelly Racing, that run their Subarus, had to park them due to lack of parts from Top Run. Andre Heimgartner got that Subaru hooked up. Was pretty quick at fast & twisty tracks, until it broke.Audi and Subaru are sedans as well...although I don’t think the Subaru is being used anymore. The longer wheel base and better aerodynamics of the sedan cars give them an advantage on fast, high speed circuits, but they tend to struggle on tighter, more technical tracks.
...and I'm afraid this was not the only one, and was not the last one. But it's a long story and not just sad, but slightly offtopic.very ugly time in WTCC history, had very little to do with actual racing