GTPNewsWire
Contributing Writer
- 21,563
- GTPHQ
This is the discussion thread for a recent post on GTPlanet:
This article was published by Michael Leary (@Terronium-12) on December 13th, 2019 in the Gaming category.
On stage, Phil did say it’d set a new bar for compatibility (among other things)... so that would be nice. Though it’s possible he might’ve been alluding to some sort of PC game compatibility with that.I hope this has Full Backwards capability rather then Partial, I don't want to search the tombs of Ancient Egypt to get a console that can play Sega GT2002.
This is the Lamborghini "Lambo" V12 Vision GT of consoles.Oh, Microsoft. Amazingly, the names just keep getting worse.
The emphasis on 60-120fps and minimizing input latency is interesting; initiatives I hope Sony will copycat.
Its smaller than one xNot sure what to think.
Backwards combatibility is huge for me. Can proberly convinse me to buy at launch.
The Design could be a deal breaker for me. Hoping it can fit into my exixting tv rack, as I am not interested to have a PC standing in the living room.
Its smaller than one x
Heard anything about VR?
~45*25*25 + PSU. One X 60*30*25. You could place x series horizontally or verticallyDosent look like it. It looks like its a bit more tall than the controller when its laying down. The current Xbox one s ( wich I have ) is only about half as tall as the controller.
So its double as tall as the Xbox s wich will mean a lot of people will have problems where to place it in existing tv shelf and racks.
The more I see it the less I like it. But gues we will have to wait until we know more about it.
Ugly and has the worst, most unoriginal name possible.
I agree it’s a rather lame name, but it’s far more original than putting a 5 behind the same name you’ve been using for 20+ years.