GTPNewsWire
Contributing Writer
- 21,620
- GTPHQ
This is the discussion thread for a recent post on GTPlanet:
This article was published by Andrew Evans (@Famine) on February 21st, 2020 in the Automotive News category.
Fun fact: Czinger's CTO is Jon Gunner, a Swedish aerospace engineer (Fokker, Saab) who spent 12 years at Koenigsegg and was technical director on the Agera R, Regera and One:1.Koenigsegg has finally met its match it seems.
This is not surprising, considering the Suzuki Escudo Dirt Trial Car from the late 90s already produced a mind-numbing 995PS from its own 2.5L twin-turbo V6 back then but of course, that wasn't a road car."2.88 litre 80 degree flat plane V8"
It's two Kawasaki ZX-14 engines, isn't it?
That's 400+ bhp before you add the turbos.
I love these organic, topology-optimised / generative design structures. You can even fairly easily "design" them at home and get them "printed". Amazing.
Which itself wasn't a patch on the first turbo era in F1.This is not surprising, considering the Suzuki Escudo Dirt Trial Car from the late 90s already produced a mind-numbing 995PS from its own 2.5L twin-turbo V6 back then but of course, that wasn't a road car.
I think because some of these types of cars are done in such small numbers, it is like a collecting game for billionaires, with few being seen to be actually used. The Czinger is certainly different, and the production techniques are certainly revolutionary. Get the billionaires to pay for the tech experiments.Well it ain't going 270 with that wing and canards and probably the mirrors too, that's for sure. And it beat the Senna by 2 seconds but did it without headlights which means the car wasn't street legal. So.
And to be clear, the process for "printing" metal is called laser sintering. There is no ink-like liquid metal involved in the process. Another name is additive welding. It's got a real future for mass-produced parts - even Stuttgart's Formula Student team was using laser sintered uprights and various other details on their car.
Edit: I think I'm being too hard on the car. I'm just a bit fed up with all these super duper cars claiming this and that and then selling all five examples to some hyper rich person who will never drive it again. It all seems like a waste to me. That said, I remember being 10 years old and scouring the internet to learn about the various hyper cars that existed back in the 90s, before they ever began marketing these things or showing up in mass media. We literally had to dig through the net to find information about them, and they were all legendary vehicles. Nowadays, everything has a whole Youtube series detailing its development. I do love seeing the development of these cars, I love the details, but something about them hits different these days than when I was a kid and I can't put my finger on it.
Also, wasn't there a tuning company like a decade or more ago called Czinger? I feel like they modified Porsches or something. I could swear that name used to be a thing and it was unaffiliated with this new car.
Nah, I'm thinking of a company that existed when I was a child, one of those wild cars I discovered on Supercars.net or something.
For me its the human element. Older cars look like great engineering from the hands , the human brain, from car lovers. Today they look like machines created by computers from engineers. It just doesn't impress me hearing all these numbers either, not forgetting performance isn't just about top trumps but how long the car can perform for in one session. The name also keeps ring a bell with me too, pretty sure it was Porches they modified.Well it ain't going 270 with that wing and canards and probably the mirrors too, that's for sure. And it beat the Senna by 2 seconds but did it without headlights which means the car wasn't street legal. So.
And to be clear, the process for "printing" metal is called laser sintering. There is no ink-like liquid metal involved in the process. Another name is additive welding. It's got a real future for mass-produced parts - even Stuttgart's Formula Student team was using laser sintered uprights and various other details on their car.
Edit: I think I'm being too hard on the car. I'm just a bit fed up with all these super duper cars claiming this and that and then selling all five examples to some hyper rich person who will never drive it again. It all seems like a waste to me. That said, I remember being 10 years old and scouring the internet to learn about the various hyper cars that existed back in the 90s, before they ever began marketing these things or showing up in mass media. We literally had to dig through the net to find information about them, and they were all legendary vehicles. Nowadays, everything has a whole Youtube series detailing its development. I do love seeing the development of these cars, I love the details, but something about them hits different these days than when I was a kid and I can't put my finger on it.
Also, wasn't there a tuning company like a decade or more ago called Czinger? I feel like they modified Porsches or something. I could swear that name used to be a thing and it was unaffiliated with this new car.
Keep in mind that downforce increases as an exponent of speed. Laguna Seca has both low top speeds and low cornering speeds so it's helpful to have a lot of mechanical grip since not much downforce will be generated at any setting. A track like Spa much higher speed corners where it's easy to generate lots of downforce. It doesn't look like the Czinger has DRS but it's got the power to run through all that downforce. I think the Czinger would handily beat anything Koenigsegg offers, or anything anybody else offers, at a track like Spa.Go somewhere like Spa and this car will be right up there with the Koenigsegg One:1 I reckon.