GTPNewsWire
Contributing Writer
- 21,443
- GTPHQ
This is the discussion thread for a recent post on GTPlanet:
This article was published by Andrew Evans (@Famine) on August 14th, 2020 in the WRC Series category.
"17 to 26 years old."
Well dang, I guess I am out. Lol Not that I had a chance to begin with but it would have been nice to see how far one can get.
That's me out too.
We could always fib about our age
By the time this competition starts, I'll be 17+26 years old...
Must be a survivor in the wilderness - Will Hunt For Food.Who the hell is Will Hunt?
Who the hell is Will Hunt?
Doubt it,Was suggested during Dirt Rally days by lotsa players but nothing came of it.What with the WRC going hybrid there might not be a WRC anymore cause who apart from kids are going to go see a hoover go past sideways?
# No turbo pops/bangs,No buy.
Wrc still will have same turbo engines, just with hybrid added on top.
Still be be plenty of pops, bangs and burbles.
Remember 2 strokes ?
My guess 2025 no more bangs,No more pops.
Being fascinated by rally since I was a kid and have being lucky to watch the sport evolve for 50 years.
All my mates thought Brocky or Johnson could drive,The blokes I looked up to were driving group b/a/wrc cars and had weird names.
Please God no!!!My guess 2025 no more bangs,No more pops.
And it really doesn’t have to be this way.It's so sad it's come to this. Other people who don't follow/like cars & Motorsport don't understand, it feels the only sport I love is being cruelly taken away, why us ?
And it really doesn’t have to be this way.
Formula one are developing synthetic fuels which seem actually a better solution to both motorsport and domestic vehicle use.
Win win really.
Electric cars, the answer to a problem that doesn’t exist.
Big petroleum companies have synthetic solutions to the problem of the planet running out of fossil fuels and the modern internal combustion engine and it’s associated technologies are cleaner than a cows fart.
Electric cars, the answer to a problem that doesn’t exist.
Big petroleum companies have synthetic solutions to the problem of the planet running out of fossil fuels and the modern internal combustion engine and it’s associated technologies are cleaner than a cows fart.
Can I pipe in, given that I wrote a paper for my masters on the subject (and that's a masters within the automotive industry)?" Wow this thread descended in bull**** in record time."
It would appear that your a authority on such matters.
Yes, they do, how many articles and peer-reviewed papers on it would you like?Exactly. No one talks about the real atmosphere destroying industry, ie avation & the jet engine, oh no bad for business so that's allowed.
Why?But for sports cars, weekend fun car etc and definitely motorsport, ice with hybrid and synthetic fuel with associated catalytic converters and direct injection clean burn technologies, still have a place and make more sense than a wholesale ban on said vehicles.
I can only speak from my own experience, my daily driver chr hybrid is fine for what it does, but dull.
My weekend toy is a v8 bmw 840, but I’d only put maybe 1000miles per year on it, it’s fun.
So I’m still maintaining a decent carbon footprint whilst not denying myself fun.
And I’m not anti electric for everyday motoring, my next car will be full electric, but I’d not for example change any of my motorbikes for electric as they just don’t work, with too much weight and too little range.
I’m not the biggest f1 fan, more MotoGP/superbikes, but I applaud f1 for their vision of sustainability with move to hybrid and synthetic fuels, proving this combination with clean burn technologies still have a place in today’s and indeed tomorrow’s world.
From a motorsport fans perspective, what would you prefer to watch between f1 and fe?
Or MotoGP and moto e.
And sunny Sunday, which do you prefer to go for a ride on, your thumping v twin sp1 or some sort of 500kg battery electric thing with a range of 70 miles if your lucky?
That's a poor comparison, particularly given that electrics that are both fun to drive and will outperform the majority fo road cars exist.I can only speak from my own experience, my daily driver chr hybrid is fine for what it does, but dull.
My weekend toy is a v8 bmw 840, but I’d only put maybe 1000miles per year on it, it’s fun.
So I’m still maintaining a decent carbon footprint whilst not denying myself fun.
And I’m not anti electric for everyday motoring, my next car will be full electric, but I’d not for example change any of my motorbikes for electric as they just don’t work, with too much weight and too little range.
That depends on the quality of the racing, not the type of fuel, quite frankly since its inception FE has provided a lot closer racing and a less predictable outcome that F1 has.I’m not the biggest f1 fan, more MotoGP/superbikes, but I applaud f1 for their vision of sustainability with move to hybrid and synthetic fuels, proving this combination with clean burn technologies still have a place in today’s and indeed tomorrow’s world.
From a motorsport fans perspective, what would you prefer to watch between f1 and fe?
Or MotoGP and moto e.
I don't ride bikes anymore, but in all honesty, I still care more about how something drives/rides more than what powers it.And sunny Sunday, which do you prefer to go for a ride on, your thumping v twin sp1 or some sort of 500kg battery electric thing with a range of 70 miles if your lucky?
To be fair, yes, in a nutshell.What you are effectively saying is the reason why you don't what the change to occur, which is perfectly fine, but its an emotional reaction to change, rather than a real explanation as to why it would 'make more sense'.