Alfa Romeo 512 1940

  • Thread starter Pete05
  • 7 comments
  • 1,219 views

Pete05

Premium
7,080
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
image.jpg

image.jpg

image.jpg

image.jpg

image.jpg

image.jpg

image.jpg


The undoubted pre-war highlights among the rear-engined single-seater racing machines were the ultra-successful ubercars built by the Auto Union racing department. That is, if you could call them highlights when the opposition comprised of a strange collection of Indy specials and the earlier Tropfenwagen.
While the Auto Unions were at the pinnacle of world motor racing for over five years it took a long time before another European designer felt the need to follow in Ferdinand Porsche's footsteps to create a mid-engined racing car of his own. We shouldn't forget that Porsche himself, after severing ties with Auto Union, made a rear-engined proposal to Mercedes for the 3-litre regulations.
The man in question was Wifredo Ricart, the willful designer at Alfa Romeo, which had seen it's previous 8, 12 and 16 cylinder counter efforts against the almighty Germans fail miserably. Alfa Corse were also running terribly late with their latest Grand Prix challenger, the 162, which later turned out to be stillborn. Then the new 1.5-litre supercharged GP regulations for 1941 onwards became known.
There was an initial scare, as Mercedes had upstaged the competition by winning the 1939 Tripoli GP out of the blue with their W165, and this was blown up into a real fright when the new 'baby' Auto Union Type E was rumored to have an engine capable of producing well in excess of 300 bhp at a crank speed of 9000 rpm. Clearly the then servicing Alfa voiturette, the highly successful 158 'Alfetta' with it's straight-8 engine was only producing 225 bhp @ 7600 rpm, wasn't going to be a match. Drastic measures were needed.
Of course everybody at Alfa Romeo knew of the handling difficulties that a rear-engined layout presented, and that it needed a special talent such as Bernd Rosemeyer to eek out the full potential of the car, especially with the driver having to sit far forward in the nose, unable to quickly feel the handling changes that a swing-axles rear suspension would transfer to him.
Still, the intrinsic advantages of an engine positioned behind the driver had become apparent to Ricart, the Spaniard who has succeeded Lancia-bound Vittorio Jano as the Portello design team's top man. Amongst others, his crew consisted of the talented Gioacchino Colombo, who had been responsible for the Alfetta and later joined Ferrari and the revived Bugatti team and Luigi Bazzi, who did the famous Bimotore. Ricart entrusted the former with the detailed design of the rear-engined car.
So when the new 1.5-litre supercharged Grand Prix formula was laid down, Colombo drew an Auto Union Type D inspired racing car to rival the Mercedes W165 and Auto Union Type E. The 512 used a flat-twelve DOHC engine with two-stage supercharging. Tested on the bench it had peaked at 370 bhp @ 9000 rpm while averaging 335 bhp @ 8600 rpm. That was considerably above the rumored Auto Union target, giving cause to optimism in the Portello works.
The car itself followed Auto Union lines by placing the fuel tank directly behind the driver and positioning the gearbox behind the back axle. The car's twin-tube ladder frame was suspended by wishbones at the front and a DeDion setup at the back, on top of which low-slung, bulging bodywork was placed.
The detailing was meticulous but also very time-consuming, especially since Italy was becoming more involved in World War II by the month. It is amazing, however, that development carried on well into the war and that the finished product was tested as late as 1943, although parts testing had started in mid-1940.
Some of the tests took place on the Milan-Varese autostrada, and it was on the early morning 19 June 1940, during one of these tests, that Alfa's faithful tester Attilio Marinoni was killed as his 158 carrying the 512 rear suspension hit an unsighted truck during an overtaking manoeuvre. Consalvo Sanesi, the mechanic-turned-tester, tested the car many times at Monza and predictably reported that it was a real handful. More tellingly, however, was his conviction that the Alfetta was quicker. On the other hand, Carlo Pintacuda was said to be much more flattering about the 512's behavior.
In the end we will know. Along with the other Alfa Romeos the 512 was stored in the famous cheese factory but the only thing the racing world heard of it in 1946 were it's detailed design plans issued in an Auto Italiana article.
Although post war Alfa threatened to bring out the 512s as soon as the Alfettas got beaten, they never needed to and never did.

ENGINE

Configuration

180 degree V12

Location
Mid, longitudinally mounted

Construction
Light alloy block and heads

Displacement
1489 cc / 90.9 cu in

Bore / Stroke
54 mm (2.1") x 54.2 mm (2.1")

Compression
6.6:1

Valvetrain
2 valves per cylinder, DOHC

Fuel feed
Carburettor

Aspiration
Twin Superchargers

Power
335 bhp / 250 kW @ 8600 rpm

DRIVETRAIN

Chassis

Aluminium body on steel frame

Front suspension
Double wishbones, longitudinal torsion bar, friction dampers, hydraulic shock absorbers

Rear suspension
DeDion axle, longitudinal torsion bar, friction dampers, telescopic shock absorbers

Steering
Worm and wheel

Brakes
Drums, all-round

Gearbox
5 speed manual

DIMENSIONS

Weight

710 kg / 1565.3 lbs

Length
4320 mm / 170.1"

Width
1500 mm / 59.1"

Height
1050 mm / 41.3"

Wheelbase
2450 mm / 96.5"

Front track
1320 mm / 52"

Rear track
1310 mm / 51.6"

http://www.kolumbus.fi/leif.snellman/c1.htm

http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/1647/Alfa-Romeo-512.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfa_Romeo_Tipo_512
 
Last edited:
And probably easier to drive... :D
With the, as the Alfaisti like to call it, 180 degree V12 :lol: :odd:, it would have to have a lower C of G and with a more manageable horsepower level, I would say so.
However, I don't think it would have a lot of torque with a 54 mm stroke.
Narrow rev range anyone?
 
Back