Author Harper Lee Subject to Elderly Abuse Investigation

4,464
United States
Azle, TX
supermanfromazle
SanjiHimura
Back in 1955, Harper Lee's 'To Kill A Mockingbird' was one of the best selling books in America. It got so popular, that Lee wrote a sequel to the book, but refused to publish it.

Fast forward 60 years, the world was excited to learn that Lee's unpublished book, 'Go Set a Watchman', was due to be published for the first time. Excitement turned to concern, and concern turned into suspicion as to how Lee's publishing house, actually got permission from the author, who is 88, when she is known to be a recluse and has a fear of the media?

That is what the state of Alabama wants to know, who through their Human Resources Department was quoted as saying, " [they] requested an investigation to see if Lee, in a nursing home and suffering from deafness, blindness, and dementia, was being taken advantage of by parties anxious to reap the scores of millions of dollars one final novel by the great Harper Lee would produce.”

“With an investigation involving Monroeville’s most famous resident underway, friends and acquaintances who have come forward in recent weeks have offered conflicting accounts of Ms. Lee’s mental state, with some describing her as engaging, lively and sharp, and others painting her as childlike, ornery, depressed and often confused,” notes the New York Times. “Several people said that her condition varied depending on the day.”

Both Lee’s publisher, HarperCollins, and her agent have dismissed claims that she’s being taken advantage of. In fact, HarperCollins’ president and publisher, Michael Morrison, states he visited Lee last month and said she was in “good spirits” when they discussed details of the upcoming book. “It was a great meeting,” he told the Times, “and as expected, she was humorous, intelligent and gracious.”

Still, it’s concerning that an investigation of this nature is taking place. We just hope that Lee’s decision to publish Go Set a Watchman is her own, and no one else’s.
 
The stories I've read about the release of this book seem to spring from one extreme to another; Harper Lee either wanted to publish the book but was prevented from doing so by her domineering sister... or she never wanted to publish the book and was protected from having to do so by her fiercely protective sister.

It's easy to believe that the publishers desperately want this book (because they very much do) and I hope that the truth is properly outed.
 
“With an investigation involving Monroeville’s most famous resident underway, friends and acquaintances who have come forward in recent weeks have offered conflicting accounts of Ms. Lee’s mental state, with some describing her as engaging, lively and sharp, and others painting her as childlike, ornery, depressed and often confused,” notes the New York Times. “Several people said that her condition varied depending on the day.”

Harper Lee is my grandma. It's the same thing-- behavior is best described as day-to-day.
 
This will be impossible to judge. I work with dementia patients every shift and wouldn't want the job of deciding when someone was of sound mind in such a condition.
 
To Kill a Mockingbird is one of my favourite books of all time. I read it every few years. I thought it was odd that Harper Lee came out of the blue after a half century to release a new book and it sounds like it's possible there's much more to the story.
 
Cover for the new book, Go Set A Watchman is reminiscent of To kill a Mockinbird, not only the old oak tree but train tracks and a train in the distance. HarperCollins has announced a first printing of 2 million copies and a July 14th release date. Finally my copy of Mockingbird will have some company.
Now . . . Catcher in the Rye? That's getting lonely, too. I hear, though, that some of J.D's writings are being exhumed.
 
It seems to be in the public domain now, here it is (click to expand)

EDIT: To be clear, this is just the cover, not the full book :)

go-set-a-watchman-harper-lee-cover__oPt.jpg
 
Last edited:
So Perez Hilton is the publisher?
That is a watermark. All sites use them to some extent to track unaccredited images in a news article. And if my hunch is right, it is still copyrighted under US law, especially if it is the first printing. Author's life+50 years and all that jazz.
 
That is a watermark. All sites use them to some extent to track unaccredited images in a news article. And if my hunch is right, it is still copyrighted under US law, especially if it is the first printing. Author's life+50 years and all that jazz.

Harper Lee isn't the author of the cover, the publisher is. The cover's use is permissible under "Fair Use" once in the public domain (as it is now and as it was as soon as it was published in advertising) and can, in US law, also be considered a "useful article".

Book covers are very often shown by convention and there has never been, to my knowledge, any case where a publisher has restricted the spread of what is, effectively, free advertising.
 
Harper Lee isn't the author of the cover, the publisher is. The cover's use is permissible under "Fair Use" once in the public domain (as it is now and as it was as soon as it was published in advertising) and can, in US law, also be considered a "useful article".

Book covers are very often shown by convention and there has never been, to my knowledge, any case where a publisher has restricted the spread of what is, effectively, free advertising.
I had thought that you were talking about the book for a minute. You're right.
 
Back