Citigroup buying new jetairliner!

  • Thread starter seckcimike
  • 24 comments
  • 1,276 views
103
GTP_seckcimike
NEW YORK (AP) — Pressured by the Obama administration, Citigroup Inc. reversed course and said it will not take delivery of a corporate jet it previously planned to purchase.

The canceled deal comes amid a chorus of concerns from politicians who are worried about how banks that have received federal funds are spending the money. Citigroup has received $45 billion in capital from the government in recent months amid the ongoing credit crisis.

"Citi has no intent to take delivery of any new aircraft," the New York-based bank said in a statement Tuesday.

An official in President Barack Obama's administration reached out to Citigroup on Monday to reiterate Obama's position that such jets aren't "the best use of money at this point," and are "an outrageous use of funds" for a company getting taxpayer dollars, said a White House official who spoke on condition of anonymity to more freely describe private conversations.

In a statement late Monday, Citi said it had placed a deposit in 2005 to acquire a new corporate jet, and said it didn't plan to use government funds for the purchase. The New York-based bank noted that any cancellation of the deal would likely lead to millions of dollars in penalties.

On Monday, the New York Post reported that Citi was set to take possession of a new corporate jet, and was still planning to receive it even after it received the government funding.

With the cancellation of the deal, a deposit on the jet will be lost, but is recoverable once the jet is sold, according to a person familiar with situation. Citi was in the process of purchasing a Dassault Falcon 7X for $50 million, the person said.


lOL THESE PEOPLE JUST DONT GET IT.
 
Why do they need a corporate jet? Isn't 1st class good enough for them?

It makes sense to buy the jet if they are going to lose there deposit. It can always be re-sold. The people running these banks must literally be laughing all the way to it.
 
An official in President Barack Obama's administration reached out to Citigroup on Monday to reiterate Obama's position that such jets aren't "the best use of money at this point," and are "an outrageous use of funds" for a company getting taxpayer dollars
$150 million inauguration!
 
I'd be suggesting a little of the former, a whole bunch of the latter and a decent chunk of the folk in the middle.
 
If they didn't have the public's money in the first place it wouldn't be a problem, now would it? I'm willing to bet they ordered this jet a while ago. Maybe not before all the bailout garbage but very close to it.

Anyway, yeah, they simply can't be that extravagant after accepting billions in public funds.

$150 million inauguration!
True and it really wasn't even worth it. So lackluster with the classical music, mispeaking Chief Justice and of course, boring speech.
 
At least poke them to buy an American one.


Now Canadian owned :D



I'm willing to bet they ordered this jet a while ago. Maybe not before all the bailout garbage but very close to it.

Below

Citi said it had placed a deposit in 2005 to acquire a new corporate jet

Usually there is a few year waiting list for new jets, looks like someone else will get theirs early now citi will forfeit it.
 
See, that's what I'm saying. it's not like they said, "Hey! We just got a bunch of free money! Let's buy a new jet!" But I can understand the feelings of Obama and every other taxpayer when something like this happens.
 
I saw on the news this...

"Pimp My Ride": Thain's $1.2 Million Office Remodel

Naked Capitalism reports John Thain spent upwards of $1.2mm on an upgrade of his "suite" upon joining Merrill Lynch. After all, what's a million here and there when you're losing 10-50,000x that (yes... 50,000x that). Below is a breakout of ~$400k of that total (rumor has it the other $800k was to hire celeb designer Michael Smith).

thain.png


But really... who doesn't need a $1400 parchment "waste can"?

Boy that trash can better be damn good! :scared:

Robin.
 
And because they paid a $m deposit, they've now got $m more debt (as opposed to an asset worth $50m, of which they've paid $m) - and that means the taxpayer has just a little bit more money to pay to CitiGroup in Obama's bail-out.

Not particularly joined-up thinking from Obama's office there.
 
And because they paid a $m deposit, they've now got $m more debt (as opposed to an asset worth $50m, of which they've paid $m) - and that means the taxpayer has just a little bit more money to pay to CitiGroup in Obama's bail-out.

Not particularly joined-up thinking from Obama's office there.

Hence the entire problem with huge public support of privae companies.
 
President Obama isn't exactly setting the prime example of efficiency and professionalism himself.

Pump up the heat and take off your coat as you sign a stimulus bill that pushes for energy efficiency, Mr. President.
 
...and that means the taxpayer has just a little bit more money to pay to CitiGroup in Obama's bail-out.

Not particularly joined-up thinking from Obama's office there.

*Ahem*

Bush's bail-out.
 
The one Obama asked him to sign before he left office? 'Cos I was referring more to the putative $1 trillion Obama's supposedly about to shovel in.

That's... what, £3m per US citizen?
 
The one Obama asked him to sign before he left office? 'Cos I was referring more to the putative $1 trillion Obama's supposedly about to shovel in.

That's... what, £3m per US citizen?
HEY!!!! This new one is a stimulus package. The media has clearly labeled the two differently and your failure to recognize the difference is unacceptable.

To be fair, the newest package has less bailout and a lot more pork.

The simple fact the the president has let his first major bill become filled with things that are only there because they can't pass on their own is sad.
 
'Cos I was referring more to the putative $1 trillion Obama's supposedly about to shovel in.

See, I thought you were talking about the banking bailout that otherwise hasn't worked.

This shovel-ready stimulus?

Meh. I don't really think there is a good way to do any of it, so all I can do is sit here and critique it as best as possible to make something good of it. I'd like to see more infrastructure spending, but, you can only get so much of a good thing.

...Which makes me wonder if Congress reads Moody's...

mz_012208_1t.gif
 
Do ExPats count?

And isn't £3 million more like $5 million?

I'll even accept mine in installments. $1m a year is enough to tide me over till the crisis passes.
 
NEW YORK, Jan. 27 (UPI) -- Beleaguered New York financial giant Citigroup said it canceled an order for a new $50 million corporate jet after White House officials criticized the idea.

The luxury jet liner, a French-made Dassault Falcon 7X, would have seated 12 in high style, ABC News reported Tuesday.

Citigroup defended its decision to go ahead with the purchase Monday. But, officials from the Obama White House called and told the company to "fix it," ABC reported.

By "fix it," the officials meant fix the public relations disaster of a company receiving $45 billion in a taxpayer bailout, then -- even though the jet was ordered two years ago -- spending $50 million on a company toy that would, at capacity, serve 12 people.

"The president said this during the transition, as it related to the auto companies using private jets, (he) doesn't believe that's the best use of money at this point," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said.

"We have no intent to take delivery of any new aircraft," the company said in a statement issued Tuesday.



No matter how you look at it, its negative propaganda to the public eye.
 
I would have thrown down the "Or What?" gauntlet. As I understand it (correct me if I'm wrong), the money that the banks got was done with no-strings-attached; and any PR ridiculousness Obama was going to try and pull (and I can't imagine what difference it would have made anyways) could have been easily turned around against him.
 
Last edited:
And the net result is that quite a few US dollars have gone out of the country for no return - as CitiGroup lost the $m deposit they'd placed on the plane 4 years ago.
 
Back