cool pic

heres a kinda neat pic i found;)
 

Attachments

  • 58.jpg
    58.jpg
    14.3 KB · Views: 212
LEmme see if I can get this right, from closest to furthest down the track they are

S13
S14
S14 or Fc3S Pretty sure it's a S14 though
S14
Fc3S
 
cold out....

i dunno what you are talking about...

its pretty hot in here...

i see a B1 and a B2 twins in action...
 
i have no need to think... all function to the brain has been shut of and hte blood has been diverted into other areas...

i dun think its cold in her land... i think i turn her on... jk jk jk

btw i cant read whats on the shirt... can you zoom in please...
 
haha, hey I was wondering...how reliable are RX-7's? I really like the 2nd gen and 3rd gen RX-7's but I've heard that they aren't very reliable.
 
Originally posted by Ethix101
haha, hey I was wondering...how reliable are RX-7's? I really like the 2nd gen and 3rd gen RX-7's but I've heard that they aren't very reliable.
As reliable as any other turbo sportcar when taken care of properly.

and how can you beat 3 moving parts instead of the bunches on a piston motor? :D
 
the turbo motors are a lot less reliable than the N/A motors. the turbos have reliability issues that piston engines dont run into...this is why mazda ditched the whole turbo thing on the rotary, and went with an N/A setup on the RX-8. the N/A rotary is one of the most reliable engines in the world....but a turbo on the other hand..lol:rolleyes:
 
Although, Mazdaspeed is working on a turbo design for the rx-8. should b interesting to see what they come up with considering there isnt alot of room for a turbo in the engine bay newayz. Plus the turbo rx7 had cooling problems. You also couldnt put on bolt on mods without strengthening the internal parts of the engine as well.
 
Originally posted by LanEvo
the turbo motors are a lot less reliable than the N/A motors.

This is misleading. Engines with more power on the same block will be less reliable, that's just the way it is. A properly installed turbo will not damage an engine any more than a stroker kit or wild cams, in relation to how much power it provides.
 
Originally posted by LanEvo
the turbo motors are a lot less reliable than the N/A motors. the turbos have reliability issues that piston engines dont run into...this is why mazda ditched the whole turbo thing on the rotary, and went with an N/A setup on the RX-8. the N/A rotary is one of the most reliable engines in the world....but a turbo on the other hand..lol:rolleyes:

I'll add some more:

If you want the car to be reliable, then you need to make sure that the apex seal is good before you push it hard. That's the weakness of the turbo'd RX-7. You might need to change this seal every like 3,000 miles if you push it hard. Hear say :rolleyes:
 
actually rx07 are super un realiable reason i know this because i ahve 3 friends the own a shop and own them,,, and they are always in need of repairs, and they just eat oil

the only one i would ever own is a FC series 3 or also known as the Turbo Two
 
Back