Ding, dong, the witch is dead!

  • Thread starter Duke
  • 22 comments
  • 1,119 views

Duke

Keep 'em separated
Staff Emeritus
24,344
United States
Midlantic Area
GTP_Duke
DaimlerChrysler CEO Schrempp to leave

Thursday July 28, 7:55 AM EDT

By Michael Shields, European Auto Correspondent

FRANKFURT (Reuters) - DaimlerChrysler's embattled Chief Executive Juergen Schrempp will leave at the end of the year, the carmaker said in a shock announcement on Thursday that eclipsed good earnings and sent its shares soaring.

Daimler said Schrempp, whom disgruntled investors accused at their annual meeting of poor performance and shoddy leadership, had volunteered to hand over the reins of the world's fifth-biggest automaker to Chrysler chief Dieter Zetsche.

The news boosted DaimlerChrysler's stock -- the laggard so far this year among European carmakers -- more than 10 percent. They traded at 39.87 euros at 1120 GMT, up 9.7 percent.

DaimlerChrysler debt rallied. Five-year credit default swaps on the company fell two basis points to 72 basis points, meaning it costs 72,000 euros a year to insure 10 million euros of the automaker's debt against default, a trader in London said.

Schrempp's leaving added some 3.7 billion euros to the firm's market value. The stock has underperformed sector peers by half since Daimler-Benz's 1998 merger with Chrysler, which Schrempp trumpeted as creating the first truly global carmaker.

"This is the day I've been waiting for," said JP Morgan automobiles analyst Philippe Houchois. "It's a wonderful day for the auto industry as a whole."

Chairman Hilmar Kopper said now was the best time for the CEO to go.

"The supervisory board and Prof. Schrempp are in full agreement that the end of the year 2005 is the optimal time for a change in the leadership of the company," Kopper said in a statement.

"The decisions of the supervisory board have been made unanimously after a thorough process," he said.

Although Schrempp's contract runs until 2008, he will only draw his salary until the end of this year, a spokesman said, insisting Schrempp had left voluntarily and not been forced out.

TALL IN THE SADDLE

The 60-year-old globetrotting German executive has worked at the group for 44 years, 17 of them as CEO.

Despite criticism, Schrempp had remained firmly in the saddle thanks to support from Kopper, labor unions and Deutsche Bank, which has a 10.4-percent stake.

Zetsche, 52, helped turn around the number-three U.S. automaker at a time of ferocious competition in North America. [Editor's note - the only reason Dieter Zetsche needed to "turn around" Chrysler is because Daimler abuse and mismanagement had screwed them up to begin with. -Duke] The German manager gets a five-year stint as group CEO. He is succeeded by Chrysler chief operating officer Thomas LaSorda.

Zetsche's track record at Chrysler inspires confidence, Sanford Bernstein analyst Stephen Cheetham wrote in a note to clients, keeping his "market perform" rating.

Still, "we do not believe his appointment materially changes our view of the company's normal earnings power, and the largest of sacred cows -- the group's value-destroying conglomerate structure -- is unlikely to be slaughtered near term."

Analysts said Zetsche was unlikely to divest Chrysler but questioned whether he would want to keep its 30 percent stake in Airbus parent EADS for the long term.

Schrempp's decision to build a carmaker with global reach led to the merger with Chrysler and its investment until last year in Japan's struggling Mitsubishi Motors Corp.

Both deals hurt profits and created management headaches while diverting attention from luxury division Mercedes Car Group. As head of Daimler's aerospace division, Schrempp also bought now-defunct Dutch aircraft maker Fokker.

MERCEDES SPRINGS SURPRISE

The group's second-quarter operating profit fell 20 percent to 1.67 billion euros ($2.02 billion), easily beating expectations thanks to a surprise operating profit at Mercedes.

Mercedes posted a 12 million operating profit despite an extra 311 million euros in charges to restructure Smart.

U.S. arm Chrysler, sucked into a North American price war with rivals General Motors and Ford, saw operating profit gain 4 percent to 544 million euros, also above analyst estimates of 412 million.

The group reiterated its forecast for slightly higher 2005 operating profit excluding restructuring costs for its loss-making Smart minicar brand.

Traditional cash cow Mercedes has been grappling with the strong euro, model changeovers, spending to fix quality problems and hefty losses at Smart. Its first-quarter operating loss of 954 million euros marked its first red ink since 1993.

The profit collapse prompted a new efficiency drive that aims to boost earnings at the division by up to 3.5 billion euros and restore an operating margin of 7 percent by 2007. (Additional reporting by Ralf Banser and Christiaan Hetzner in Frankfurt and Jane Barrett in Milan) ($1=.8287 Euro)
 
I love Jurgen Schrempp.

Without him and his wonderful brand, Chrysler would cease to exist today.

Basically, he saved Chrysler so we can buy wonderful products like the 4-cylinder Sebring and short-wheelbase 2.4-liter Town & Country. What a man!
 
You're joking, right? I don't mean about the cars; you're definitely right about those. But I mean, the only thing Chrysler needed to be "saved" from is having Daimler-Benz rip them off for all their cash. Chrysler was doing fabulously in the mid-'90s. That's what made D-B want to rape them in the first place!
 
Duke
You're joking, right? I don't mean about the cars; you're definitely right about those. But I mean, the only thing Chrysler needed to be "saved" from is having Daimler-Benz rip them off for all their cash.

You're talking, but all I'm seeing is this:

clk55_06_H.jpg


Chrysler was doing fabulously in the mid-'90s. That's what made D-B want to rape them in the first place!

Did you know that internally, the Chrysler LH cars were referred to as the "Last Hope" cars? Fabulously my ass. Schrempp is probably a CLK owner, that sexy little devil.

Another great Chrysler is the 2.7-liter 300 sedan.
 
Actually, I owned a '96 Sebring not too long ago (Inheritance if anyone is wondering), and it was not a bad car at all. It was comfortable, there was plenty of room inside, it was quiet with the roof down, and it was reliable. After spending around 5 years not being moved in a parking garage, the car started up fine, and after a check from a mechanic, we found it had absolutely no mechanical problems whatsoever.

Mind you, it's not my type of car. It lacked acceleration, it's front wheel drive, and it has an automatic transmission. I guess my grandpa bought it for a reason then...
 
M5Power
Did you know that internally, the Chrysler LH cars were referred to as the "Last Hope" cars? Fabulously my ass.

Another great Chrysler is the 2.7-liter 300 sedan.
Yeah, OK, that's because they were the first non-K-derived cars, and they denoted the end of the Iaccoca Era and the beginning of modern Chrysler. Chrylser successfully made that move and the styling, drive quality, and value all made quantum leaps between '90 and '95 - and profits followed immediately. The Neon was the first American-designed and -made compact car to turn an actual profit, based on its own sales, ever. The entire line except the minivans had been redesigned from scratch and the Grand Cherokee pwned - hell, invented the semi-luxury SUV segment.

Chrysler was incredibly cash-rich, their engineering system was at the top of its game, and they were even doing decent marketing in the early second half of the '90s, when along came Schrimpp, and Lutz sold them straight down the river.
 
Duke
Yeah, OK, that's because they were the first non-K-derived cars, and they denoted the end of the Iaccoca Era and the beginning of modern Chrysler. Chrylser successfully made that move and the styling, drive quality, and value all made quantum leaps between '90 and '95 - and profits followed immediately. The Neon was the first American-designed and -made compact car to turn an actual profit, based on its own sales, ever. The entire line except the minivans had been redesigned from scratch and the Grand Cherokee pwned - hell, invented the semi-luxury SUV segment.

The Neon. Lord.

The minivans. Lord.

The Grand Cherokee was probably the least-reliable vehicle of the 1990s except POSSIBLY for the Wrangler, which took a year off the market simply to get retooled so reliability would be less of an issue! Early LH cars were bad too. The only DECENT Chryslers in the mid-1990s were the damn minivans.

Once I had a book on Chrysler; it talked about the merger. I wonder what happened to it.
 
M5Power
The Neon. Lord.
Say "Lord" all you want, but it remains the first American compact car to turn a profit, ever. The fact that it dominated Showroom Stock racing until it got ruled against, and remains competitive (if no longer dominant) in autocross, is just coolness. It's been called by several non-affiliated sources as "the best amateur race car ever".

So I'll Lord you.
The minivans. Lord.
What about them? They got redesigned in 1998 or '99, too.
The Grand Cherokee was probably the least-reliable vehicle of the 1990s except POSSIBLY for the Wrangler, which took a year off the market simply to get retooled so reliability would be less of an issue! Early LH cars were bad too. The only DECENT Chryslers in the mid-1990s were the damn minivans.
I don't know about least reliable, but I'll stipulate that you probably do. But you can't deny that the Grand Cherokee was the SUV that proved that a powerful and luxurious SUV would sell like hotcakes and make a lot of money doing it.
 
Duke
What about them? They got redesigned in 1998 or '99, too.

My ass. Those things haven't been fully redesigned since 1996 and you, I, and Chrysler know it. I'm begging for an all-new 2007 Caravan. Then again, why the hell should they redesign it, considering its popularity?

I don't know about least reliable, but I'll stipulate that you probably do. But you can't deny that the Grand Cherokee was the SUV that proved that a powerful and luxurious SUV would sell like hotcakes and make a lot of money doing it.

It was, but Chrysler ****ed that up too - they had that in a position where it could've truly been the best-selling SUV around. They aimed it too much at the luxury niche and let it go one or two years past redesign (in 1992, when it debuted, the style was pretty conservative), so Ford stole the show with the all-new 1995 Explorer. Ford's timing was perfect, and now Grand Cherokee is #13 on the best-seller list rather than #4 or whatever the Explorer is.

Do you know that I personally blame Chrysler, and specifically the LH cars, for ConsumerReports' American-car bias?
 
Does anyone else think that Benz's look boring? (Bar, MAYBE the AMG SL's).
They're all pretty similar, and lack flare. They're kind too conservatice in my opinion. I mean, if I just paid $182k for my S65 AMG, I really wouldn't want it to blend in with a S320.....(Unless that what I was going for, and in that case, I'd have to get rid of those lovely rims and put on cheap ones, and badge it as a S320)
 
E55Power
Does anyone else think that Benz's look boring? (Bar, MAYBE the AMG SL's).
They're all pretty similar, and lack flare. They're kind too conservatice in my opinion. I mean, if I just paid $182k for my S65 AMG, I really wouldn't want it to blend in with a S320.....(Unless that what I was going for, and in that case, I'd have to get rid of those lovely rims and put on cheap ones, and badge it as a S320)

Nope, they all look the same. And Chrysler did get screwed over, but atleast you can tell the Chryslers apart, unlike their more upscale german "cousins".

'Ol bob better not try to sell GM..
 
Bob just got demoted over at GM.

Mercs may all look the same to you common folk, but at the yacht races, we can clearly tell them apart. In fact, I was discussing this with a day trader at the country club last weekend as I was waiting for the polo match to begin. Myself and the day trader both felt that our summer homes would be well-equipped if we could include the latest Mercedes cars, and our chalets would too be ready for winter if we could get the latest in four-wheel drive Mercedes SUVs. After the polo match, we had cigars by the pool while our butler took the afternoon off.

(For the record, profits would be way up if not for the quality issues the damn cars are having. Sales are record-level)
 
Who is this man, anyways?
Is he the same one on the commercials advertising the employee discount for Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep vehicles?
 
M5Power
Bob just got demoted over at GM.

Mercs may all look the same to you common folk, but at the yacht races, we can clearly tell them apart. In fact, I was discussing this with a day trader at the country club last weekend as I was waiting for the polo match to begin. Myself and the day trader both felt that our summer homes would be well-equipped if we could include the latest Mercedes cars, and our chalets would too be ready for winter if we could get the latest in four-wheel drive Mercedes SUVs. After the polo match, we had cigars by the pool while our butler took the afternoon off.

(For the record, profits would be way up if not for the quality issues the damn cars are having. Sales are record-level)
Don't make jokes like that. With you having more $$$ than God, I almost belived it. :grumpy:
 
McLaren F1GTR
Who is this man, anyways?
Is he the same one on the commercials advertising the employee discount for Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep vehicles?

That's Lee Iaccoca the man who saved Chrysler in the 1970s. it was Robert Eaton who sold Chrysler out, not Maximum Bob Lutz. Hell, Lutz was excluded from the takeover talks even though he was trillingual.
 
Hmm, I've found that losing Schrempp is like losing your case of pinkeye:

It's a relief, and your vision is no longer blurred. . .


. . .but you didn't really mind waking up to pull out all of the crusties, either.
 
Back