Domestic Terrorism - Mother Earth would be proud.

  • Thread starter milefile
  • 19 comments
  • 724 views
10,832
This was happening where I live a couple years ago. This is how some people think they can get results.

Save the Milkweed!!



Arson Destroys 12 New Md. Homes
30 Empty Houses Damaged in Subdivision That Is Subject of Environmental Dispute

By Joshua Partlow and Michael E. Ruane
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, December 7, 2004; Page A01

A dozen empty houses in a new Maryland subdivision that is the focus of a long-running environmental dispute were destroyed and numerous others were damaged yesterday in what officials said were more than 20 coordinated, methodically planned arsons.

No one was hurt, but the attack left the Hunters Brooke subdivision, near Indian Head in Charles County, scarred with blackened, gutted houses and terrified residents in the quiet community near the Potomac River about 25 miles downstream from the District.

Firefighters battle one of the blazes, which left blackened, gutted houses in the subdivision. Investigators found evidence that an accelerant was used. (James M. Thresher -- The Washington Post)

_____Graphic_____
• Charles County Fire
_____Free E-mail Newsletters_____
• Today's Headlines & Columnists
See a Sample | Sign Up Now
• Breaking News Alerts
See a Sample | Sign Up Now

A preliminary investigation found traces of a fire-starting accelerant in four houses that were the first to be examined by investigators, officials said. Damage was estimated at $10 million, and William E. Barnard, the state fire marshal, said it was the biggest arson in state history. In addition to the 12 homes destroyed, about 30 were damaged, authorities said.

Investigators said more than 20 fires were set. Some houses were burned to the ground, and the second floors and roofs of others were burned out. The structures seemed to have been targeted at random, investigators said, with some houses spared while others nearby were destroyed.

Investigators said the fires were confined to the unoccupied section of the development, away from homes where people live. About 70 houses had been finished or were under construction in the subdivision, and 319 more were planned, the developer said.

For the past five years, two subdivisions in the area, Hunters Brooke and the yet-to-be-built Falcon Ridge, have been a source of fierce opposition from environmental groups, which have sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers for allowing houses to be built in the area.

Environmentalists assert that the houses will damage Araby Bog, a 6.5-acre wetlands area that is home to endangered insects and such rare plants as the halberd-leaved greenbrier and red milkweed. The bog filters rain and upwelling waters that feed into the nearby Mattawoman Creek and the Potomac.

Scores of investigators from county, state and federal agencies were on the scene or headed there yesterday, including a 15-member "national response team" from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives made up of chemists, interviewers, schematic artists, fire cause-and-origin experts and other specialists.

An ATF spokesman, Mike Campbell, said an anti-terrorism task force of local and federal investigators was called to the scene to explore whether the fires were set by radical environmentalists.

Environmental extremists have claimed responsibility for similar attacks elsewhere, often through online postings or messages left at the scene. Federal authorities classify such extremists as domestic terrorists. No such claim had been asserted as of yesterday afternoon, said Theresa R. Stoop, special agent in charge of the ATF's Baltimore office.

Jonathan Tepper, sales and marketing manager for the D.C. division of Lennar Corp., the builder for the development, said he did not believe the fires were set by anyone opposed to the environmental impact.

"Our concern about this whole thing is the families," Tepper said. "Several of them had bought homes as Christmas presents for their families."

Terri Rookard, who had moved to Hunters Brooke four days earlier, said she was awakened before dawn when her eldest son burst into her room saying that he smelled smoke. She looked out her window and saw flames pouring out of a nearby home. More fire was visible through another window.

"Then we just panicked," said Rookard, 35. "We couldn't tell what was going on. It was a nightmare. We were trying to get out, and there was fire everywhere."

When members of the Potomac Heights Volunteer Fire Department arrived in the area about 5 a.m., three homes were on fire, said Chief Scott Creelman. Shortly afterward, several other homes went up in flames, he said, until 21 houses were burning.

"Everything just happened so fast," Creelman said. "Two more houses lit off. Then three more houses. . . . There was a progression."

Firefighters battle one of the blazes, which left blackened, gutted houses in the subdivision. Investigators found evidence that an accelerant was used. (James M. Thresher -- The Washington Post)

_____Graphic_____
• Charles County Fire
_____Free E-mail Newsletters_____
• Today's Headlines & Columnists
See a Sample | Sign Up Now
• Breaking News Alerts
See a Sample | Sign Up Now

More than 100 firefighters rushed to the scene from six counties in Maryland and Virginia.

Charles County sheriff's deputies blocked the entrance to the subdivision along Route 225, and authorities led reporters on a brief tour at 2:30 p.m.

The charred wreckage of the houses, which were in various stages of construction, was scattered across hundreds of yards along three streets. What remained of some homes along Cabinwood Court, the scene of the worst damage, was still smoldering.

Some houses were reduced to brick rubble, and others had melted vinyl siding. Shattered glass and window screens littered the lawns.

The site is one of the few remaining examples in the world of a magnolia bog, so named because the wetlands are ringed by sweet bay magnolias, evergreen trees that blossom every spring with fragrant white flowers. Rod Simmons, a botanist with the Maryland Native Plant Society, which opposes the subdivision, said only 11 magnolia bogs exist in the world, and all are in the Washington area.

"It's really the last viable sweet bay magnolia bog in the world," said Ellie Cline, a Charles County resident who is a plaintiff in the lawsuit against the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers. The lawsuit argues that the agencies should not have authorized the building. "It's an incredibly valuable natural resource."

Cline said she did not believe environmental activists were involved in the fire. "I don't know of anybody associated with this fight that would think this way," she said.

Some residents said there had been previous problems at the subdivision, such as appliances stolen from vacant homes. Rookard, a program specialist with the State Department's Bureau for African Affairs, said a neighbor told her that someone spray-painted racial slurs on one home. She said most of the new homeowners she has met are African American.

The homes, whose prices range from $373,000 to $486,000, are on quarter-acre lots. Many have four or five bedrooms and two-car garages.

The development is at the crest of a housing boom that is pushing the Washington suburbs farther and farther into rural areas once far removed from the city.

Many residents who recently purchased homes in Hunters Brooke spent a tense day waiting outside police cordons to learn about the condition of their properties. Authorities said residents would be kept out of their homes overnight because power had been shut off and the subdivision is a crime scene.

Everton Rowe, 37, an engineer with the State Department, said the four-bedroom, $450,000 home he planned to move into in January sustained some damage, but he did not know the extent. He said he saw environmental protesters picketing the subdivision late last year. If environmental protection was a motive in the crime, Rowe said, it would be a tragedy.

"If you're going to threaten people's lives to protect a forest or an animal, something is twisted in your head," said Rowe, the father of two young children. "This is going to put pain in my daughter's little heart. She's not going to want to stay here."

Bob DeGroot, the leader of an environmental group that had opposed the development, said he doubted that "any environmental group had anything to do with" the fire.

"We don't have environmental groups in Maryland that do those sorts of things," said DeGroot, president of the Maryland Alliance for Greenway Improvement and Conservation. "When we disagree with something, we take them to court."

The FBI said it had not decided whether to investigate the blazes as part of a pattern of fires set across the country, for which the group Earth Liberation Front has claimed responsibility. Those fires caused more than $60 million in damage in the past 18 months.

Members of ELF, known as "elves," are increasingly targeting suburbia, especially new developments that are encroaching on wilderness. FBI spokesman Barry Maddox said that investigators have not ruled out any possibilities and that "anything and everything would be considered right now."

"We're not limiting it to domestic terrorism or anything else," Maddox said. "We're not coming to any kind of conclusion at this time."
 
👍 👍 👍
So now, not only were the resources used to build the houses and the land itself altered to make the subdivision, but thanks to these sheisskopfs it's all wasted, and the environment is much worse off than if they had just left it... plus all the resources and energy that will be used to build the houses again.

Good thinking, comrades! Fight the good fight!

This reminds me of a recent story in Philadelphia. The ELF (or other eco-terrorists) planted a fake bomb on a cel tower near a major traffic artery. So in ordeer to protest the environment-destroying construction of the cel tower, they caused the authorities to shut down the highway at rush hour, leaving 8 to 10,000 cars parked there, idling away, for about 4 hours. Gee, how's that for environmental responsibility?

If these people hate humanity so much, why don't they put their money where their mouths are and get rid of themselves?
 
Duke, couldn't agree with you more. Now I am for protecting the enviroment as the next guy, but there is a line, and they not only crossed it, they burned it.
 
neon_duke
👍 👍 👍
So now, not only were the resources used to build the houses and the land itself altered to make the subdivision, but thanks to these sheisskopfs it's all wasted, and the environment is much worse off than if they had just left it... plus all the resources and energy that will be used to build the houses again.

Good thinking, comrades! Fight the good fight!

Thank you. My sentiments exactly.

As an aside, have you notice how many econinnies drive 20 year old beaters that spill more filth into the air on their way to a FotE rally than a typical SUV does all month? Next time you see a envirofacist bumper sticker, note how it is attached to a smog belching POS more often than not.


M
 
And after you noted it, nudge it off a cliff with them in it....just tell them its for the good of mother earth, and they'll gladly go down !
 
I love that Simpsons episode with the guy who's car is powered by his own "sense of self satisfaction".

I guess people don't need places to live any more. I guess the vast empty expanses of America should remain just that.

If the losers who commited these acts could afford a house themselves, or a modern, efficient and clean car, they might not be so resentful and angry. Maybe then they could relate to humans better than weeds.
 
I think these idiots have been smoking too much "weed."


Non-violent protests with guns?

The tactics of the United States’ most dangerous domestic terrorists may take an even more violent turn in the near future, if their own rhetoric can be believed. This week the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), which the FBI puts at the top of its “domestic terror group” list, claimed that it “will no longer hesitate to pick up the gun” to provide “protection for our planet.”


Anarchist Internet mailing lists and chat rooms are abuzz with this news, which has some activists cheering. “If the authorities are going to hand out 22 year sentences for the burning of a truck,” asks one ELF enthusiast, “why not respond in kind?”



Saying that “global revolutionaries” must no longer adhere to “a flawed, inconsistent, ‘non-violent’ ideology,” the ELF took credit for setting a $700,000 fire at a U.S. Forest Service installation near Erie, Pennsylvania. Firebombs are nothing new for this criminal organization, but this marks the first time its members have openly called for the use of deadly force. One Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms agent told the Associated Press that responding “firefighters’…lives [were] in danger” as well. ELF has also vowed that it will target the facility again if it is rebuilt.



Just last week, Forest Service Officials warned loggers in Montana that many of the out-of-state environmental activists operating there are trained in arson, vandalism, and bomb-making. Many, said the agency’s Bill Fox, are “people who have direct ties to the Earth Liberation Front…. These people play hardball.”



ELF’s sister group, the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), has spawned several special-interest subgroups. These include the anti-human-health “SHAC” organization, run in the U.S. by former ALF “spokesperson” Kevin Kjonaas; and a British anti-hunting group called the Urban Alliance.



In recent weeks, SHAC has resumed its campaign of intimidation against Huntingdon Life Sciences’ bankers and stock traders, distributing the names, addresses, phone numbers, social security numbers, and physical characteristics of employees targeted for harassment. “There are some very sick people in this world,” notes one stock trader who receives literally hundreds of vulgar and harassing phone calls every day.



In Great Britain, the anarchist and animal-rights-oriented “Urban Alliance,” which wants to outlaw fox-hunting, has issued a “hit list” of pro-hunting celebrities, including members of the royal family. The group’s web site includes the exhortation that “the only good hunter is a dead one.” The Observer reports that hunters in the UK have received mail “booby-trapped with razor blades” in recent weeks, which may just be a wind-up for aggressive violence to come.
 
Oh let's all hate people who care about the environment now because some extremists put a torch to some jack-ass housing project for the rich and shameless.

I totally disagree with their methods. It's as bad as those moronic pro-lifers that shoot docters who perform abortions. But they do have a point. In many places, the environment always has to make way for 'economic interest' and that's very short-sighted. Some things can only be destroyed once.
 
The only point they have is on the top of thier heads, they are pontificating idiot asswipes.
 
The notion that humans can "destroy" Earth is ridiculous. We don't have the power to destroy Earth. If we did we'd have the power to create it, too. Earth always finds a way and I have more faith in it than I do in any human endeavor. Earth would do away with humans long before we could have any chance of "destroying" it.

We are biological organisms who belong here as much as any furry creature or poisonous plant. The fulfilment of our lives as the most advanced and dominant species on Earth is harmonious with the history of the Earth in general. The idea that we are somhow in danger is silly. We aren't. We're the fittest.
 
Arwin
Oh let's all hate people who care about the environment now because some extremists put a torch to some jack-ass housing project for the rich and shameless.
Where are people supposed to live? Where are homes to be built? Ot do we stop building homes? Or do we only build homes of a certain limited size and cost? As the human population grows we'll need more and more homes.

Rich and shameless? What is that about? Have you met them? Are you judging them based on the cost of their houses? Are they less deserving of a home because they can afford a bigger one? Please explain your words.
 
Arwin
Oh let's all hate people who care about the environment now because some extremists put a torch to some jack-ass housing project for the rich and shameless.
I don't hate people who care about the environment. I drive a car that gets 25-30 mpg, I recycle most of the non-organic garbage that goes out of my house (cans, bottles, plastics, newsprint, magazines and motor oil), and I have a setback thermostat that carefully controls the heating and cooling of my house. I live within 10 miles of work on a small lot in a moderate-density neighborhood built 50 years ago, so I'm not contributing to suburban sprawl.

Why do you assume, just because I think these people are moronic jackasses who should be shot out of hand, that I hate everyone who cares about the environment?

I'll let the implication that I'm rich and shameless pass, for the moment.
 
milefile
Where are people supposed to live? Where are homes to be built? Ot do we stop building homes? Or do we only build homes of a certain limited size and cost? As the human population grows we'll need more and more homes.

Rich and shameless? What is that about? Have you met them? Are you judging them based on the cost of their houses? Are they less deserving of a home because they can afford a bigger one? Please explain your words.

Come on milefile, it's obvious that such a housing project wouldn't have been allowed at the cost of this rare nature habitat if there hadn't been some serious money involved. The rest you mention is a different topic, but yes we certainly have the capacity to set back evolution a few million years after which it is possible life will never again evolve to this point.

Neon, I don't understand why you replied to my post. What did it have to do with you?
 
Arwin
but yes we certainly have the capacity to set back evolution a few million years after which it is possible life will never again evolve to this point.

How can we "set back evolution"? That's an absurd idea. Evolution has no goal in mind, it is not trying to do anything specific. It is the most general description of how life lives. Nothing more.
 
News Article / milefile
The site is one of the few remaining examples in the world of a magnolia bog, so named because the wetlands are ringed by sweet bay magnolias, evergreen trees that blossom every spring with fragrant white flowers. Rod Simmons, a botanist with the Maryland Native Plant Society, which opposes the subdivision, said only 11 magnolia bogs exist in the world, and all are in the Washington area.

So, torch the homes (so innocent people can have basic need), thus screw the homeowners...makes perfect sense if you get caught up in the angy-mob-mentality! If they were so angry about where the homes were placed, why didn't these terroristas go after the people who approved the zoning for the sub-development?
 
milefile
How can we "set back evolution"? That's an absurd idea. Evolution has no goal in mind, it is not trying to do anything specific. It is the most general description of how life lives. Nothing more.

Check out the actual meaning of the word.

Besides, even by your definition, we could end evolution. If evolution is the most general description of how life lives, and we terminate life altogether in our corner of the universe with no evidence of life anywhere else, then life as we know it is no more, and evolution perished with it.

My point is that after the dinosaurs were wiped out, evolution was set back. Fortunately, it developed beyond the dinosaurs after that, into the brilliant little things called the human species (though its members don't seem to all shine equally bright). But I would like to point out that, unlike some suggest, there is no guarantee at all that if we allow ourselves to be wiped out, or wipe ourselves out, anything better will come after us.

My hope is that instead of killing itself and all life with it, the human race spreads itself and live out across the universe and beyond.
 
Beyond the universe?

You seem to take a linear view of evolution. So be it. I happen to understand that the extinction of the dinosaurs, and all other mass extinctions, were merely part of evolution. In fact, the extinction of the dinosaurs was necessary for homo sapiens to argue it's meaning on the internet a couple hundred million years later.

How is the possibility of humans predicated by the extinction of the dinosaurs a "setback"?
 
milefile
Beyond the universe?

You seem to take a linear view of evolution. So be it. I happen to understand that the extinction of the dinosaurs, and all other mass extinctions, were merely part of evolution. In fact, the extinction of the dinosaurs was necessary for homo sapiens to argue it's meaning on the internet a couple hundred million years later.

How is the possibility of humans predicated by the extinction of the dinosaurs a "setback"?

D*mmit put your brain back on today, I answered your question even before you posted it. Go to bed early and reboot tomorrow morning. 👍
 
Arwin
Oh let's all hate people who care about the environment now because some extremists put a torch to some jack-ass housing project for the rich and shameless.

I totally disagree with their methods. It's as bad as those moronic pro-lifers that shoot docters who perform abortions. But they do have a point. In many places, the environment always has to make way for 'economic interest' and that's very short-sighted. Some things can only be destroyed once.

I agree. It's surprising how many people, on this site, and everywhere, just think that everything is expendable. 'Well, people need places to live', so let's chop down every goddammed tree in the land! I need firewood for my fireplace dammit, i'm gonna go chop down some old growth forest, that'll burn nice. Who needs a septic tank, i'll just pipe my toilet into the ocean, it's big enough to handle it. :rolleyes:

Yes the mentioned groups are terrorists, by all definitions. But i can't say i'm too upset about them burning unoccupied homes in a subdivision.

But it is funny about treehuggers driving polluting cars though. I have noticed that. I'm no extremeist but I can tell you that if we don't stop destroying everything around us, our grandchildren are going to have it hard. heck, maybe even our children.
 
milefile
The notion that humans can "destroy" Earth is ridiculous. We don't have the power to destroy Earth. If we did we'd have the power to create it, too. Earth always finds a way and I have more faith in it than I do in any human endeavor. Earth would do away with humans long before we could have any chance of "destroying" it.

We are biological organisms who belong here as much as any furry creature or poisonous plant. The fulfilment of our lives as the most advanced and dominant species on Earth is harmonious with the history of the Earth in general. The idea that we are somhow in danger is silly. We aren't. We're the fittest.


wow, you kidding right? 'Earth allways finds a way'???? you must be joking. Earth, if you've notice, is a slow mover. It takes nature quite a long time to recover from major setbacks. Humanity clearly has the power to extinguish 99% of life on the planet. Have you forgotten the Cold War already? let me refresh your memory with Nuclear Holocaust(sp?)... Do you know how the rainforest (which just so happens to be the major producer of oxygen) works? when the cattle farmers clear cut it for grazing land, it doesn't grow back. It's an extremely fragile system.

Sure 'Earth' will find a way, a couple million years later, after we've trashed it and starve to death.
 
Back