- 154
Evo VII GSR
Model Year 2001
Acquire Price $ 29,980
Sell Value $ 7,495
Engine L4 DOHC
Drivetrain 4WD
Aspiration Turbo
Stock HP 305 @ 6,500 RPM
Tuned HP 594
Stock Weight 1400 kg // 3,080 lbs
Tuned Weight 1190 kg // 2,618 lbs
Stock P/W Ratio 4.590
Tuned P/W Ratio 2.003
Torque 282 @ 3,000 RPM
Displacement 1,997 cc // 2.0 liters
Height 1,450 mm // 57.1 in
Length 4,455 mm // 175.4 in
Width 1,770 mm // 69.7 in
Wheelbase 2,625 mm // 103.3 in
Track Front 1,515 mm // 59.6 in
Track Rear 1,515 mm // 59.6 in
vs.
EVO VI Tommi Makinen Edition
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI GSR T.M.E. (stripe,J)
Model Year 2000
Acquire Price $ 32,780
Sell Value $ 8,195
Engine L4 DOHC
Drivetrain 4WD
Aspiration Turbo
Stock HP 302 @ 6,500 RPM
Tuned HP 568
Stock Weight 1360 kg // 2,992 lbs
Tuned Weight 1156 kg // 2,543 lbs
Stock P/W Ratio 4.503
Tuned P/W Ratio 2.035
Torque 274 @ 3,000 RPM
Displacement 1,997 cc // 2.0 liters
Height 1,405 mm // 55.3 in
Length 4,350 mm // 171.3 in
Width 1,770 mm // 69.7 in
Wheelbase 2,510 mm // 98.8 in
Track Front 1,510 mm // 59.4 in
Track Rear 1,505 mm // 59.3 in
stats are from www.gtvault.com
I was doing a little EVO comparison, and I noticed that the Mitsubishi EVO VII GSR was quicker than the EVO VI Tommi Makinen Edition, even though the EVO VI T.M.E. is about 40kg lighter, lower to the ground, a bit shorter, and claims to have tuned suspension for tarmac.
The heavier EVO VII GSR (J) ran about .4 seconds faster on the 400m, and gets considerably better times around the track. It seems to me it also has stiffer suspension. In the stats it also has a bit more torque, but I doubt that with these specs it should outperform the T.M.E. I did some research online and everywhere the T.M.E. seems to be a bit faster than the EVO VII GSR,
can someone who knows more about those cars explain this? Does the VII GSR really outperform the VI T.M.E or is this some sort of inaccuracy in GT3???
Model Year 2001
Acquire Price $ 29,980
Sell Value $ 7,495
Engine L4 DOHC
Drivetrain 4WD
Aspiration Turbo
Stock HP 305 @ 6,500 RPM
Tuned HP 594
Stock Weight 1400 kg // 3,080 lbs
Tuned Weight 1190 kg // 2,618 lbs
Stock P/W Ratio 4.590
Tuned P/W Ratio 2.003
Torque 282 @ 3,000 RPM
Displacement 1,997 cc // 2.0 liters
Height 1,450 mm // 57.1 in
Length 4,455 mm // 175.4 in
Width 1,770 mm // 69.7 in
Wheelbase 2,625 mm // 103.3 in
Track Front 1,515 mm // 59.6 in
Track Rear 1,515 mm // 59.6 in
vs.
EVO VI Tommi Makinen Edition
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI GSR T.M.E. (stripe,J)
Model Year 2000
Acquire Price $ 32,780
Sell Value $ 8,195
Engine L4 DOHC
Drivetrain 4WD
Aspiration Turbo
Stock HP 302 @ 6,500 RPM
Tuned HP 568
Stock Weight 1360 kg // 2,992 lbs
Tuned Weight 1156 kg // 2,543 lbs
Stock P/W Ratio 4.503
Tuned P/W Ratio 2.035
Torque 274 @ 3,000 RPM
Displacement 1,997 cc // 2.0 liters
Height 1,405 mm // 55.3 in
Length 4,350 mm // 171.3 in
Width 1,770 mm // 69.7 in
Wheelbase 2,510 mm // 98.8 in
Track Front 1,510 mm // 59.4 in
Track Rear 1,505 mm // 59.3 in
stats are from www.gtvault.com
I was doing a little EVO comparison, and I noticed that the Mitsubishi EVO VII GSR was quicker than the EVO VI Tommi Makinen Edition, even though the EVO VI T.M.E. is about 40kg lighter, lower to the ground, a bit shorter, and claims to have tuned suspension for tarmac.
The heavier EVO VII GSR (J) ran about .4 seconds faster on the 400m, and gets considerably better times around the track. It seems to me it also has stiffer suspension. In the stats it also has a bit more torque, but I doubt that with these specs it should outperform the T.M.E. I did some research online and everywhere the T.M.E. seems to be a bit faster than the EVO VII GSR,
can someone who knows more about those cars explain this? Does the VII GSR really outperform the VI T.M.E or is this some sort of inaccuracy in GT3???
They say the VII is made out of better materials, some aero dynamic improvements etc... so now im really confused 
