Faketaxi livery

[Lutiano]

Hearby i share some of my Faketaxi liveries.

http://www.gran-turismo.com/sg/gt7/...c9-a9dda4f34a68/gallery/All/19422268193146871

http://www.gran-turismo.com/sg/gt7/...c9-a9dda4f34a68/gallery/All/19563360714899488

http://www.gran-turismo.com/sg/gt7/...c9-a9dda4f34a68/gallery/All/19422572708747053

http://www.gran-turismo.com/sg/gt7/...c9-a9dda4f34a68/gallery/All/19422548061008239

http://www.gran-turismo.com/sg/gt7/...c9-a9dda4f34a68/gallery/All/19704342474520312

 

[GTvon]

I don't get it. Why would you want a fake taxi?

 

[Lutiano]

Liveries are not available anymore due to somebody who couldn’t handle a loss in a daily race and reported my liveries resulted in a ban for 7 days.

 

[GTvon]

I'm sorry but I'm still not getting it. What the heck is a fake taxi? I can't imagine that anyone would actually want this livery anyways. It's nothing but a matte black decal some lettering.

 

[grandtourismo]

maybe promote degenerate porn websites elsewhere and not on gran turismo

 

[TexRex]

maybe promote degenerate porn websites elsewhere and not on gran turismo

[clutches pearls]

 

[grandtourismo]

[clutches pearls]

you do know gran turismo has no age rating right? as in children play it? do you think it's appropriate?

 

[Lutiano]

you do know gran turismo has no age rating right? as in children play it? do you think it's appropriate?

Do you think children know that it’s a website ? And if that children know what it is, better look to their parents and how they manage the internet usage of their children

 

[TexRex]

you do know gran turismo has no age rating right? as in children play it? do you think it's appropriate?

I gather Gran Turismo 7 actually does have an age rating. The minimum age recognized by the Entertainment Software Ratings Board is 6 years, and that is reflected in their "E for Everyone" rating given to the game. I'm given to understand the European equivalent is PEGI (I don't know what that stands for) and the game is recommended to those aged 3 years and up. Crucially, online interactions are explicitly not subject to these ratings and games fairly consistently include disclaimers that appear on the packaging indicating as much.

I don't take exception to the reference to ["degenerate," as described by an individual I'd expect would consider a woman's bare ankles 'neath the hem of her dress an affront to decency] pornographic content, and the content displayed at the start of this thread is not itself pornographic.

I think the reference to pornographic content is cringeworthy at worst, but I don't understand the ease with which some are driven to condemn it.

I also recognize that online interactions are a privilege granted conditionally by Sony and Polyphony Digital, and so content deemed inappropriate by either of these parties may be removed without notice or explanation and the access to online interaction may be terminated.

 

[Nuschel01]

I remember one of the most famous liveries in MCLA was a 🟥tube liveried Evo IX and it made me cringe so much everytime I saw somebody else use it
These liveries are just 12yo humor imho

 

[TexRex]

I remember one of the most famous liveries in MCLA was a 🟥tube liveries Evo IX and it made me cringe so much everytime I saw somebody else use it

 

[Nuschel01]

I'm not talking about YouTube

 

[TexRex]

I'm not talking about YouTube

Ah. I didn't feel like asking again so I spent ten minutes searching. I had to sift through lots of construction supplies before I found what I gather to be the reference.

I haven't actively sought out pornographic content in probably close to 30 years, so I'm a little out of the loop.

 

[Lutiano]

After i got banned for 7 days i not complaint about my ban at all, it is what it is and yes i used and shared the livery, but i tried to have a conversation with Sony about the fact that in the basics there is something wrong in the way they handle this kind of stuff, first of all I didn’t upload the decal but found it in the livery editor so actually they allowed me to use it in The first way.
Actually Sony should delete also all company logo’s where they didn’t pay the money for to be used in the game.
Second of all, Sony is responsible for the age rating of their game so instead only delete decals after being reported they should filter it directly after uploading and only allow it after being inspected.

 

[Lutiano]

After i got banned for 7 days i not complaint about my ban at all, it is what it is and yes i used and shared the livery, but i tried to have a conversation with Sony about the fact that in the basics there is something wrong in the way they handle this kind of stuff, first of all I didn’t upload the decal but found it in the livery editor so actually they allowed me to use it in The first way.
Actually Sony should delete also all company logo’s where they didn’t pay the money for to be used in the game.
Second of all, Sony is responsible for the age rating of their game so instead only delete decals after being reported they should filter it directly after uploading and only allow it after being inspected.

And by the way in my country Sony had a official livery competition this year just after GT7 launch, guess which livery won this competition:

Well, louder than your mom last night doesn’t sound either as 3 or 6+ language.
They just make themself ridiculous by let this win.

 

[TexRex]

Actually Sony should delete also all company logo’s where they didn’t pay the money for to be used in the game.

Why?

They should delete logos if asked to by trademark holders.

They can delete logos for any reason.

Second of all, Sony is responsible for the age rating of their game

They're actually not. They're responsible only for in-game content rated by independent ratings boards.

so instead only delete decals after being reported they should filter it directly after uploading and only allow it after being inspected.

Why? Do you imagine users would be accepting of a waiting period resulting from such an approach?

Well, louder than your mom last night doesn’t sound either as 3 or 6+ language.
They just make themself ridiculous by let this win.

You opted to lead with reason previously when you posited that children wouldn't be familiar with the website to which the graphic you utilized referred. Now it seems you're leading with emotion--taking it personally--even to the extent that you've completely disregarded your earlier argument.

There are differences. "Louder than your mom last night" is a highly suggestive, tongue-in-cheek remark, but the graphic you utilized was an explicit (which is to say that there's little to no ambiguity) reference to pornographic content. Children of such a young age aren't likely to be familiar with either, but Sony and Polyphony Digital have discretion and they appear to have noted the differences between the two applications in exercising that discretion.

 

[GTvon]

Ah. I didn't feel like asking again so I spent ten minutes searching. I had to sift through lots of construction supplies before I found what I gather to be the reference.

I haven't actively sought out pornographic content in probably close to 30 years, so I'm a little out of the loop.

You mean at one time you did seek out pornography online? That's just such a sad cry for help.
18 isn't really such a young age when you are 18. Lol now we know how immature people can be even at 21 and older in many cases.

And by the way in my country Sony had a official livery competition this year just after GT7 launch, guess which livery won this competition:View attachment 1140869

Well, louder than your mom last night doesn’t sound either as 3 or 6+ language.
They just make themself ridiculous by let this win.

I guess it all depends on how loud your mom yells at you when you mess up or break a house rule, some can be pretty loud I'm guessing.

 

[TexRex]

You mean at one time you did seek out pornography online? That's just such a sad cry for help.
18 isn't really such a young age when you are 18. Lol now we know how immature people can be even at 21 and older in many cases.

Hot damn, I do love a good bitchfit. Cry more.

 

[Grayfox]

One report won't get you banned, multiple from more than one person is what it takes to get suspended.

 

[BloodRaven]

I got banned in GT Sport (well, prohibited from actually signing in on Playstation Plus and being able to do anything online regarding that) for sharing a helmet livery I made to go with a car livery I made. The thing is, I posted the car livery first. An entire day before I did the helmet.

And the person who initiated it (I'm assuming) even commented on the helmet livery on my GT Sport page. So I reported his post as it was fairly offensive to me. The next day when I checked, it was gone. I don't know if he took it down or if Sony/Polyphony did, but it wasn't there any more. I then proceeded to delete the helmet and car liveries from my gallery.

I even made a thread on it, here.

The issue I really had with it, though, was the person didn't come to me to express their disdain or them taking offense to it. They went straight to Sony/Polyphony about it. If I saw someone had a livery that offended me, I'd send THEM a message about it, first. But I guess wanting others to be grown up about things is asking too much these days.

And in case you're wondering, the livery was the General Lee from The Dukes of Hazzard with a matching helmet.

 

[TexRex]

The issue I really had with it, though, was the person didn't come to me to express their disdain or them taking offense to it. They went straight to Sony/Polyphony about it. If I saw someone had a livery that offended me, I'd send THEM a message about it, first. But I guess wanting others to be grown up about things is asking too much these days.

And in case you're wondering, the livery was the General Lee from The Dukes of Hazzard with a matching helmet.

I don't think them contacting you directly is the "grown up" approach. I think it's an approach, and it's clearly the one you'd prefer. Of course I understand why you'd prefer it--it gives you the power. If you didn't intend to cause offense, it gives you the power to take it down or not, and if you did intend to cause offense, you get to first revel in having done so and then take it down or not. When the individual reports it, however, you're at the mercy of those who avail the service to you conditionally. Whether it takes one report or many for those who avail the service to you conditionally to exercise discretion, or even if action is automated (obviously this isn't ideal as it's primed for abuse, but then moderation at scale is difficult), you're powerless. Of course you'd prefer you were not powerless.

I think being grown up about it is recognizing that broader attitudes about things may not align with your own attitudes. I think you're probably not ignorant of broader attitudes about that which you chose to share, regardless of context or intent, and so I think being grown up about it is to exercise discretion yourself and to accept that there may be consequences for sharing it. This, by the way, applies to actual real pornographic content, cringeworthy references to pornographic content that aren't themselves pornographic, pop culture clichés, and genuine lost cause idolatry.