Famine's Review: Star Trek (2009)

  • Thread starter Famine
  • 28 comments
  • 1,922 views

Famine

GTP Editor, GTPEDIA Author
Administrator
87,600
United Kingdom
Rule 12
GTP_Famine
I'm a Star Trek fan - not so much the original series (though I have a passing familiarity), but I believe I've seen every episode of The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine and Voyager (Enterprise be damned) and all the films. Even Five.

I didn't want to want to see this film. The word "reboot" usually fills me with dread (though not so much as "remake" - see my review of The Day The Earth Stood Still remake) even though it has become the vogue and not always with terrible results... Stand up, Batman Begins/The Dark Knight.

But a few trailers and one or two veiled comments from friends and acquaintances made me not want to not see it (which is different from wanting to see it, by attitude alone). And then someone who doesn't hate Star Trek came to visit - stand up, Venari - and robbed me of even that as an excuse...

And you know what?

I didn't hate it. In fact, not only didn't I hate it, I didn't even dislike it. In fact... *sigh* I liked it.


Let's just get a couple of things straight off the bat. They've employed a pretty stock sci-fi standard (time travel) to allow them to ignore everything - and I mean everything - that has ever gone before in any Trek ever. Spock (pick one) says as much at one point. This is the original Trek in an "alternate timeline". So when people mention the construction of the Enterprise on Earth as opposed to the Trek canon location (Mars Shipyard? I forget) - alternate reality. Vulcan being destroyed - alternate reality. Spock and Uhura - alternate reality. Anything else - alternate reality.

On the downside there's a few moments of Bay-esque "Hey, check these effects out!" - one scene in particular did make me stifle a yawn for a few moments as it was highly unnecessary effects for the sake of effects (near the end. Involves red blobs).

But that's it... the characters are strong, the writing is strong, the gags are plentiful and flowing, cupcake... The actors are all there or thereabouts - Pine (Kirk) I think is the weakest of the performances, but Quinto's Spock is good, Pegg's Scotty is just as fun-filled as Doohan's film performances (and his TNG appearance), Saldana (Uhuru), Cho (Sulu) and Yelchin (Chekov) are, while as largely anonymous as their originals (one scene of focus for each), at least adequately performed but I think the acting plaudits go to Karl Urban who is exceptional as Leonard McCoy.

There's enough nods to Trek of old to keep the Trek fans happy - red shirt = death; Kobayashi Maru; "I'm a doctor, not a..." - even though from a point of continuity (the entire of Trek history from the moment of Kirk's birth onwards has been changed) it's not particularly necessary or plausible, but also it retains its own identity and frees up the writers to come up with sequel after sequel after sequel after sequel without at any point treading on the toes of the six Trek films we've come to know and, to varying degrees, love.


Summary in 10 words or less: "I have been, and always shall be, your friend."

Rating: Warp 9.95
 
I am like you,I have seen just about every episode of just about every version of Star Trek.Always been a fan of the series.I am looking forward to seeing this movie.

Thanks for the review and not blowing the whistle on the whole movie Famine. 👍
 
I counted quite a number of Hollywoodish shortcuts in the film... typical sci-fi film cliches abound... time travel, the big bad alien ship... I even counted one act of "Summon Bigger Fish"... :lol:

But despite all that... I loved this film. Pine's performance may not have been Oscar material, but it's arguably better than anything Shatner did and the rest of the cast was just stellar. If there ever was a successful reboot, this is it. I haven't enjoyed a big budget movie this much for a long time.
 
I counted quite a number of Hollywoodish shortcuts in the film... typical sci-fi film cliches abound... time travel, the big bad alien ship... I even counted one act of "Summon Bigger Fish"... :lol:

Hard to miss that one though... :lol:
 
One wonders if it was deliberate. There were so many deliberate acts of pandering to us geeks that it warms my heart towards Abrams... and it amazes me that it didn't outright ruin the movie by turning it into a campfest.

Still... best Trek for a loooong time.
 
One assumes somewhere between none - he's still a cadet and he boarded the shuttle the next day after the fight - and the 4 years it'd take him to become an officer ("I'll do it in three.")
 
I definitely remember a cliché "x years later" text on the screen after the bar fight happened but before Kirk got on the Enterprise.
 
I may have zoned out with that bit - I tend not to read on-screen helper text. Though I did see "Iowa" twice (because I needed reminding that's where juvenile (err... literally and figuratively) Kirk was from).
 
Speaking of which, was "Iowa" terribly cropped out in your theater too? It was in mine, but somehow "Vulcan" wasn't. :odd:
 
Three years on the bar fight to him and Scotty reboarding at warp speed. Shuttle flies off and then the cliche "three years later" bit when it pans down on the Academy.

My thoughts on the movie parallel Famine's quite a bit, except I initially wanted to see the film :P
 
I may have zoned out with that bit - I tend not to read on-screen helper text. Though I did see "Iowa" twice (because I needed reminding that's where juvenile (err... literally and figuratively) Kirk was from).

Well there ya go. And this is why the lame "3 years later" part was one of my criticisms. They should've at least done a quick montage of flashes of each character in the academy over those three years.
 
And make it even longer? Nahhh... I thought it was well-paced. A montage would just be absurdly clichéd. It was only three years, anyway.

What's a measly 3 compared to the 25 Nero spent schlumping around undetected out in space? :lol:
 
What's a measly 3 compared to the 25 Nero spent schlumping around undetected out in space? :lol:

Old Spock explains when he meets young Kirk that as soon as Nero entered the black hole, he immediately exited into the time line of the film - right in front of the federation ship that his father and mother (and he as a fetus) were on.
 
And make it even longer? Nahhh... I thought it was well-paced. A montage would just be absurdly clichéd. It was only three years, anyway.

What's a measly 3 compared to the 25 Nero spent schlumping around undetected out in space? :lol:

Longer by what... 20 seconds?

Old Spock explains when he meets young Kirk that as soon as Nero entered the black hole, he immediately exited into the time line of the film - right in front of the federation ship that his father and mother (and he as a fetus) were on.

He meant the 25 years it took Spock to get there.
 
Shhh... that's verging on spoiler-ism.

And yes, that's what I meant.

I'm no expert on Romulans, but... don't they age? (oops... apparently they live as long as Vulcans) Get bored? Run out of dilithium crystals?

If I were Nero, for example, and had the power to lay waste to entire Federation armadas without suffering a single scratch (rammed by a Federation starcruiser for zero apparent damage... killing 47 Klingon Birds-of-Prey in one encounter and 8 Federation ships in another)... I would have just offed the Federation once I knew where and when I was.

Forget waiting 25 years in the same stinking place waiting for Spock... unless he knew the exact parameters of the black hole and exactly how far behind him Spock was when he fell through (and even then, he'd need advanced knowledge of time-travel mechanics) he wouldn't be able to predict whether Spock would be coming through behind him within a few seconds or a few millenia... if at all.

But maybe he is a super-genius. Just spit out of a rift in the space-time continuum after seeing a supernova implode into it, and he automatically realizes he's in the past! Bravo, Nero! :lol:
 
Yeah, that WAS a bit of a reach.

But, lest we forget, he's only a McGuffin to allow a franchise "reboot" while still retaining the original.
 
Yup. But the even bigger question now is: Now that the old Trek Universe has been obliterated... who's going to invent transparent aluminum?
 
Well, since he finds out
what year it is before impaling Captain Pakistan, it is assumed that he will at least wait until it becomes his "present" in the past timeline.
 
That'd take a good couple hundred years since...

Ambassador Spock isn't an ambassador until the time of TNG and Romulus hasn't been obliterated by a supernova when Picard visits it in Nemesis.
 
Hmm... yeah, and it wouldn't have mattered anyway because
New Past Spock turns out to be completely different from Old Future Spock.

Hopefully there will be an alternate ending on the BD where Nero drinks some Red and turns into a giant blob that absorbs the universe. Kanedaaaaaa...
 
Plus, as we know from the Back to the Future films...

Old future Spock will slowly fade away, having changed his past to exclude his own future thereby rendering him unable to go back in time in the first place to change his past, meaning he couldn't have changed the past by going back in time because he didn't exist in the future, unless he did in which case he can't have changed the past by going back in time because then he wouldn't exist in... ohhh, I've gone all cross-eyed.

Also, what the (Mark Webber) is "red matter" anyway?
 
Also, what the (Mark Webber) is "red matter" anyway?

Obviously, the inverse of dark matter-- an analogue to the red and black pieces in a game of checkers. Don't ask me for specific properties. I only know that it is apparently stable until used as a plot device.
 
I just saw this last night with my ex (im hoping o get back together with), and while this was a great film, the only thing that seemed out of place was the well know lines, "I'm a doctor, not a..etc" & "Live long and Prosper", they just felt out of place and stiff with the rest of the dialog. Otherwise I was really impressed with the film.
 
Possible... but there are a zillion things he could do in the meantime... warn his people, for example, to prevent the disaster in the first place... start a Klingon-Human war... visit Disneyland... kill Spock's parents...
 
A vengeful romulan only seeks out one thing-- brains.
 
I read on another forum that when
Captain Pike was being interrogated by Nero and he asked him his name, someone in the cinema audience shouted "don't tell him Pike!",
as in Dad's Army. I thought that was priceless, someone had a quick sense of humour! :lol:

As for the film I thought it was absolutely perfect, everything I wanted it to be, yeah it had a few goofs and irksome moments but I was simply amazing. Just wish that
all the events took place in the prime timeline and not in an alternate universe.
Abrams found the perfect balance between story and action whilst also keeping the fans happy and introducing new people to the franchise.

I have followed Star Trek since I was a kid and watched every series, I also loved the Enterprise series and don't understand why people hate it so much. If your a true fan you will get that its meant to be slowpaced and more of a Trek trip down memory lane than something flashy and new.

Well worth going to see this movie if you havent already.

Robin.
 
Obviously, the inverse of dark matter-- an analogue to the red and black pieces in a game of checkers. Don't ask me for specific properties. I only know that it is apparently stable until used as a plot device.

:lol:
 
Back