...Ferrari/BMW looking 1996 Escort 2 seater Convertible SVT...For real!

  • Thread starter Delirious
  • 36 comments
  • 1,503 views
Stock 1.9L with more plastic than Pamela Anderson. What more is there to say?

Personally, I don't see how that could be confused with a Ferarri or BMW at all, and it's definately not an SVT. I'm pretty sure ford never even made an SVT Escort.
 
A waste of money. I have no other things to say about. So many people buy stuff and put stuff on their cars that look ridiculous!
 
well the back end with those things sticking out of the rear looks to me like a ferrari and the headlights...beemers maybe?

so no one around here likes it? :)
 
No since its a pile of stinking crap. Why do people spend that much money on a crappy car to make it even crappier when they could have gotten a better car in the first place. Dumbasses.
 
#17
maybe in 30 years if it stays the same condition it will be worth a fortune?

Nope not at all. Hopefully it won't exist for another 30 years. :yuck: Ughh, ricers the posers of the automotive world.
 
- Original 1.9L Engine SEFI
- Under the hood cosmetics

No SVT documentation is available for this car. Look up SVT (from Ford) on the web and you will notice they never worked on the Escort. This is not a SVT by Ford. The owner named it SVT type, that's all.

This must also be to clearly indicate that the is in fact NOT a Ferrari. Because it is very convincing. At first glance I actually thought it was a Ferrari poorly converted into an escort.

Look up SVT (from Ford) on the web and you will notice they never worked on the Escort.

Hmm. Wonder why.
 
I've seen the thing for real, in the met... erm, plastic. Those pics don't do it justice, it's actually far worse.
 
May I bring to your attention:

20050319aa152218P01.jpg


The Shark - with fake alloy intercooler and twin 'side-exiting' pod filters!
 
Taurine
May I bring to your attention:

*removed image*

The Shark - with fake alloy intercooler and twin 'side-exiting' pod filters!

Sexy..... :yuck: :crazy:

Actually, I'm more interested in the GT-R in the background...
 
Seriously, how can someone take pride in either of those? One bump, the car's screwed. Not to mention, with all that extra bondo and fiberglass, the thing probably weighs more. And to think, on stock drivetrain, they probably can't make it up a hill. I would be ashamed to own either.

My rusty Civic with minor oil leak is a much better investment at $700. Atleast, I saved money on gas, insurance, and anything unnecessary to get from A-B.
 
toyomatt84
My rusty Civic with minor oil leak is a much better investment at $700. Atleast, I saved money on gas, insurance, and anything unnecessary to get from A-B.

Not to mention the embarrassment level with a rusty Civic is far lower then those two cars.


.. but not non-exsistant :P
 
Bahbo
At first glance I actually thought it was a Ferrari poorly converted into an escort.
Lol, who the hell would wan't to convert a Ferrari into a crappy ass Escort like that? 👎
 
Taurine
Not to mention the embarrassment level with a rusty Civic is far lower then those two cars.


.. but not non-exsistant :P

That's true as well. I actually like showcasing my vehicle, based on it's overall worth to me. Those two beasts, I'd put in a shed, or better yet, a swamp.
 
What a waste, you could irrigate acres of african fields with all that plastic if you turned it into pipes instead.
 
Back