Ford Transit Supervan 3

  • Thread starter pimp racer
  • 20 comments
  • 1,373 views
It looks crap, and whats with them taking pics of with GT40's and a GT70, it's an insult to thoes cars to have this in the same photograph.
 
THEY TOOK THE COSSIE V8 OUT:grumpy: I've got an old Top Gear on video with this running the F1 lump and can say it is in no way rice, it went like stink and sounded awesome! I would bet the wings are there for a purpose :D
 
Props for creativity. They shouldn't have left it white though, it will hold it's reputation forever.

4/10 - it's built for a reason, so you can't really knock it, but it's still a transit van :D
 
mr_pushrod
THEY TOOK THE COSSIE V8 OUT:grumpy: I've got an old Top Gear on video with this running the F1 lump and can say it is in no way rice, it went like stink and sounded awesome! I would bet the wings are there for a purpose :D
Eh, the only Transit on TopGear was the Transit WRC and that was a diesel.
 
Did anyone see TopGear tonight, they didi a test of how poweerful a Boeing engine was, they drove a car behind the engine at a distance of about 50 yards (I think it was 50 but if not it was less) and it first blew a Mondeo over and then they didi it too a 2CV which went flying, the roof came off. Imagine what it would've done to this.
 
yeah I saw that topgear episode, and yeah the transit has a larger area for which the crosswind can hit, but it is lighter or heavier than that 2CV??
btw, was very glad to see they used a Mondeo, i hate those cars with a passion.
 
i had one of those as a matchbox car when i was a child, it was an earlier model of course.
still it´s a pretty useless car as is the racing transit in CMR04.
 
"Originally powered by a 650bhp engine"-So that makes it a ricer?!?

Its not new you know. It was built in 1984. And a 150mph top speed isn't THAT bad.
 
With the weird front end and those funky wheels it looks like some kind of rc car to me.
 
I like it. Even if they had to lose the F1 engine, a 3-litre V6 (sounds similer to an F3000 engine) is still good. The wings are there for a reason; if they're rice, whatever that means nowadays, then an F1 car must be rice as well. The wings perform the same job (aerodynamic stability).

7.5/10, more if I can see it race something.
 
Roo
I like it. Even if they had to lose the F1 engine, a 3-litre V6 (sounds similer to an F3000 engine) is still good. The wings are there for a reason; if they're rice, whatever that means nowadays, then an F1 car must be rice as well. The wings perform the same job (aerodynamic stability).

7.5/10, more if I can see it race something.
I have to agree those wings 99.9% that the wings perform.BUt the exterior is ugly and only good thing is the engine but in a van so I kinda thing of it low.
 
this car is by no means rice.
Rice is an economy car with an economy engine and heavy bulky bodykit
This is al ightweight high powered mid engined vehicle with a van shell that does 150 mph. NOT rice.
 
Innotech
this car is by no means rice.
Rice is an economy car with an economy engine and heavy bulky bodykit
This is al ightweight high powered mid engined vehicle with a van shell that does 150 mph. NOT rice.
Ok I guess you have a point here but still I dont like it bottom line I guees its a 3/10
 
Back