If you'd like, scroll down to the bold red letters at the end of this post to view the opinion/question.
Let me lay the facts first
First of all, the forum rules:
As for the Acceptable Use Policy, here's the link: https://www.gtplanet.net/index.php?categoryid=24&PHPSESSID=c87509714cdbd07833eabd1e489fde2c
So, after reviewing the guidelines, I will continue to post this thread without the threat of a locked topic because this topic follows forum rules.
Second of all, let me pull up all of the blatantly pro-Iraqi war topics against the blatantly anti-Iraqi war topics on this thread (note that this was done typing in 'Iraq' in the search function and that none of these include locked topics):
Pro-War
Anti-War
These posts were shown to make a point that any new arguments on Iraq could not fall under any of the said topics. If anyone did try to make a new argument in the said threads, many of those topics would be locked for spamming.
And now for the locked topics that are blatantly anti-war and blatantly pro war (these locked topics have an endnote saying that there are numerous other Iraqi War threads in the forum that we should instead continue from):
Anti-War
Pro-War
On second thought, the topic under Pro-war was actually locked based on what Mr. Freak said
Anyways
This goes without saying that the bias against anti-war threads is very real. Take for example:
The above quote did not denote that thread 'locked.'
When was the last pro-war topic locked? What, are the anti-war topics too realistic???
Now that my basis for argument is down, let me being my opinion:
My opinion on the matter is that if certain people lock topics because the general theme (which is Iraq) already exists in other topics, would continuing our argument (the argument being totally different than the already existing topic) in someone elses same-themed topic be considered spamming (or whatever)? Because that wouldn't be right!!!!! Right?
Let me lay the facts first
First of all, the forum rules:
Rule #1 - You WILL NOT violate the AUP. No swearing, no personal attacks, no broad sweeping generalizations about Americans, Arabs, Muslims, Christians or any group. It will not be tolerated and offenders will be warned. Repeat offenders will be subject to administrative discipline up to and including banning.
Rule #2 - You WILL NOT post anything that even remotely suggests that people -especially civilians, regardless of nationality, race or religion should be injured or killed. Your post will be modified to remove the offending remark and you will be warned, plain and simple.
As for the Acceptable Use Policy, here's the link: https://www.gtplanet.net/index.php?categoryid=24&PHPSESSID=c87509714cdbd07833eabd1e489fde2c
So, after reviewing the guidelines, I will continue to post this thread without the threat of a locked topic because this topic follows forum rules.
Second of all, let me pull up all of the blatantly pro-Iraqi war topics against the blatantly anti-Iraqi war topics on this thread (note that this was done typing in 'Iraq' in the search function and that none of these include locked topics):
Pro-War
- https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=62479&highlight=Iraq
- https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=54568&highlight=Iraq
- https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=53750&highlight=Iraq
- https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=53065&highlight=Iraq
- https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=49985&highlight=Iraq
Anti-War
- https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=53664&highlight=Iraq
- https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=53230&highlight=Iraq
- https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=51267&highlight=Iraq
- https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=48498&highlight=Iraq
These posts were shown to make a point that any new arguments on Iraq could not fall under any of the said topics. If anyone did try to make a new argument in the said threads, many of those topics would be locked for spamming.
And now for the locked topics that are blatantly anti-war and blatantly pro war (these locked topics have an endnote saying that there are numerous other Iraqi War threads in the forum that we should instead continue from):
Anti-War
- https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=66293
- https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=66195
- https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=62301
Pro-War
On second thought, the topic under Pro-war was actually locked based on what Mr. Freak said
Anyways
This goes without saying that the bias against anti-war threads is very real. Take for example:
Read it hereViper Zero, it's not nessessary to create a new thread everytime you want to post another news article. I've already locked another redundant different thread on Iraq lately. I think you should limit your news postings to a single thread.
The above quote did not denote that thread 'locked.'
When was the last pro-war topic locked? What, are the anti-war topics too realistic???
Now that my basis for argument is down, let me being my opinion:
My opinion on the matter is that if certain people lock topics because the general theme (which is Iraq) already exists in other topics, would continuing our argument (the argument being totally different than the already existing topic) in someone elses same-themed topic be considered spamming (or whatever)? Because that wouldn't be right!!!!! Right?