I'm totally the other way around.
GTS is pretty much on the shelf for me now, I will take a look and maybe pop a video up when an update arrives, but apart from that its got almost zero appeal in comparison to AC and PC2 (which are now in terms of physics, feel and FFB very close).
While GTS is easily the best looking of the three, its also got physics that are dumbed down to such a degree that it just doesn't appeal to me at all, and the end result is the driving just feels utterly bland. The tyre model is only a slight improvement over past GT titles, vintage rubber doesn't seem to exist in PD universe, the track surface never evolves, the magic dampers are still in place, etc.
If you just want on-line matchmaking its great for that (once you look past the serious amount of glitches and exploits - odd that those who take issue with other titles QA always seem to forget just how screwed GTS is in this regard), but from a physics point of view its five years or so behind.
Its not helped at all by the lack of options that we should be able to take for granted in something that wants to present itself as a sim, why can't I adjust the FOV (hey PD - not everyone has the same size display, nor do they all sit the same distance from it), why can't I correctly set-up and calibrate my wheel, etc?
Its also utter nonsense.
I have to agree with you.As an overall "sim" experience both AC and PCars 2 are better than GTS.With that said GTS has advantages over both titles that appeal to many people (especially "casual" users).
A. Graphics (I dont think I need to explain that)
B. Overall presentation.From the way menu works to the soundtrack its imo 10 times better.
C .Online gaming.Because of the -kinda- copy-paste iRacing system and the much bigger user base,GTS wins again by far in terms of picking up the title and racing online.Its a different story if you are member of a good/organized league but 99% of the people are not so...
But when it comes down to actual "racing" the cars then GTS is the weakest of those 3 titles.I know that some would not like the next phrase but Pcars 2 and AC -especially- are more "sim" that GTS is by far.With that said you cannot appreciate the physics side of those two titles or the FFB one if you dont use a wheel,no matter how good your DS4 setting are.
So everyone have a choice to pick their poison:
a. Best in terms of overall driving experience: AC
b. Best overall title (in PS4 that is) : Pcars 2
c .Best online title/pick up and "quick play" : GTS
How do you deal with competing? As a person who likes to compete but not at set times, any time I have jumped into a lobby in both AC and PC2 it has been a terrible experience. This is the one thing which GT has got right and is more important to me than just how the cars drive and feel
This depends also mate.Like I said above GTS wins in term of online racing.With that said there is a big BUT here.
In order to make a fair comparison you need to compare the "e-sports" parts of both games and the "user's lobbies" of both games.
So GTS and Pcars have a different "e-sports" evens.GTS has the "Sport mode" while Pcars has gone in a different root and have their version of "e-sports".GTS wins hands-down because of their -copy- version of iRacing system,the system that is the best around.
If you want to compare "user's" lobbies then its pretty much the same in almost any title (AC/Pcars/GTS/Forza or whatever with again the exception of Iracing,only because of the "attitude" most members of that title ).You can either have good racing or really bad racing.