- 29,282
- Glasgow
- GTP_Mars
Apparently he didn't like his manager at Real Madrid either, I remember him saying he didn't want to come back to the Premiership for any team unless it was to play for Man U. I feel sorry for Beckham in some ways like how he's dropped out of favour quite suddenly and imo undeservedly. He wasn't starting as many games as he should have been for Real and then McLaren axed him from the England team just shy of him getting 100 caps. He's still worth having in the England squad imo even though he's past his peak. So has Ryan Giggs and you wouldn't dream of axing him from the Welsh team because he still has plenty to offer.He did say a while back he felt he could never play against United. Though he might in a friendly he never wanted to in a competitive game.
Real have made a blunder here, he may not be as good as he was but he's still a good football who can offer most teams in the world something classy.
Getting rid of Posh would also 'lessen the blow for him' too probably...£26m a year should lessen the blow for him
Getting rid of Posh would also 'lessen the blow for him' too probably...
David Beckham will leave Real Madrid at the end of the Spanish season and sign a five-year deal for U.S. side Los Angeles Galaxy worth $1 million (514,199 pounds) a week, the biggest in world sport.
Well that's different to what the BBC site says it's not quite that much, but I did use pound signs anyway .
That sick and immoral earning that he'll never get through a fraction of would've been turned down if he was really moving just for the football.
Of course he's in it for the cash - to paraphrase Jeff Lebowski, he's got to feed the monkey... I agree that it's a sick or even obscene amount of money to give to a footballer - especially to play in a country where football is most definitely a minority interest sport - but I wouldn't call it immoral. If Beckham decided to spend his money on sampling the local, erm, 'hospitality' (like Hugh Grant did) or blew it all on cocaine etc., you could possibly have then said his behaviour was immoral - but to his credit, Beckham has always conducted himself in a manner that many Hollywood stars would do well to use as an example. Basically, what Beckham does with his vast earnings is entirely up to him... if anything, it's the people who are paying him and the people who are paying the people who pay him that are fuelling this ridiculous trend of sportsmen earning such vast amounts of money.Good move for him, but we all know as much as he may deny it he's in it for the cash. That sick and immoral earning that he'll never get through a fraction of would've been turned down if he was really moving just for the football.
Can't imagine how his new teammates will feel when they earn a tiny fraction of what he does.
Bollocks to that... Reality TV 'entertains' millions of people, but it doesn't make it any less trite...Lots of sports stars make ridiculous amounts out of money... but they do something that only a handful of people in the entire world can do, and what they do entertains millions of people.
Bollocks to that too... there are plenty of equally 'talented' sports stars who never get paid anything near what the top sports stars get paid... does any sports star deserve that pay-dirt when a nurse or charity worker saves human lives every day for a pittance, whose supporting charities ask for a mere £2 a week from Joe Public to help them?Tell me you don't think that someone who's skills are matched only by a tiny sample of the human population who benefits people all over the world shouldn't be paid accordingly?
Bollocks to that too... there are plenty of equally 'talented' sports stars who never get paid anything near what the top sports stars get paid... does any sports star deserve that pay-dirt when a nurse or charity worker saves human lives every day for a pittance, whose supporting charities ask for a mere £2 a week from Joe Public to help them?