Hillary Clinton will run for President.

  • Thread starter DuckRacer
  • 77 comments
  • 2,549 views

DuckRacer

Premium
10,164
I'm surprised no one has posted anything.

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/feature/in/

I'm in. And I'm in to win.
Today I am announcing that I will form an exploratory committee to run for president.
And I want you to join me not just for the campaign but for a conversation about the future of our country -- about the bold but practical changes we need to overcome six years of Bush administration failures.
I am going to take this conversation directly to the people of America, and I'm starting by inviting all of you to join me in a series of web chats over the next few days.
The stakes will be high when America chooses a new president in 2008.
As a senator, I will spend two years doing everything in my power to limit the damage George W. Bush can do. But only a new president will be able to undo Bush's mistakes and restore our hope and optimism.
Only a new president can renew the promise of America -- the idea that if you work hard you can count on the health care, education, and retirement security that you need to raise your family. These are the basic values of America that are under attack from this administration every day.
And only a new president can regain America's position as a respected leader in the world.
I believe that change is coming November 4, 2008. And I am forming my exploratory committee because I believe that together we can bring the leadership that this country needs. I'm going to start this campaign with a national conversation about how we can work to get our country back on track.
This is a big election with some very big questions. How do we bring the war in Iraq to the right end? How can we make sure every American has access to adequate health care? How will we ensure our children inherit a clean environment and energy independence? How can we reduce the deficits that threaten Social Security and Medicare?
No matter where you live, no matter what your political views, I want you to be a part of this important conversation right at the start. So to begin, I'm going to spend the next several days answering your questions in a series of live video web discussions. Starting Monday, January 22, at 7 p.m. EST for three nights in a row, I'll sit down to answer your questions about how we can work together for a better future. And you can participate live at my website. Sign up to join the conversation here.
I grew up in a middle-class family in the middle of America, where I learned that we could overcome every obstacle we face if we work together and stay true to our values.
I have worked on issues critical to our country almost all my life. I've fought for children for more than 30 years. In Arkansas, I pushed for education reform. As First Lady, I helped to expand health care coverage to millions of children and to pass legislation that dramatically increased adoptions. I also traveled to China to affirm that women's rights are human rights.
And in the Senate, I have worked across party lines to get billions more for children's health care, to stop the president's plan to privatize Social Security, and to make sure the victims and heroes of 9/11 and our men and women in uniform receive the fair treatment they deserve. In 2006, I led the successful fight to make Plan B contraception available to women without a prescription.
I have spent a lifetime opening opportunities for tens of millions who are working hard to raise a family: new immigrants, families living in poverty, people who have no health care or face an uncertain retirement.
The promise of America is that all of us will have access to opportunity, and I want to run a 2008 campaign that renews that promise, a campaign built on a lifetime record of results.
I have never been afraid to stand up for what I believe in or to face down the Republican machine. After nearly $70 million spent against my campaigns in New York and two landslide wins, I can say I know how Washington Republicans think, how they operate, and how to beat them.
I need you to be a part of this campaign, and I hope you'll start by joining me in this national conversation.
As we campaign to win the White House, we will make history and remake our future. We can only break barriers if we dare to confront them, and if we have the determined and committed support of others.
This campaign is our moment, our chance to stand up for the principles and values that we cherish; to bring new ideas, energy, and leadership to a uniquely challenging time. It's our chance to say "we can" and "we will."
Let's go to work. America's future is calling us.

How do like them apples?

EDIT: Looks like Obama is running too.

http://www.barackobama.com/video/
 
Why the hell is she talking about Social Security and energy independence? Didn't the Democrats block attempts by Republicans to fix those situations? You know what else is disturbing? Not one word on how she would deal with the greatest threat in our lifetime:

Islamofascism.
 
I remember my dad taught me when I was watching the Wizard of Oz, whenever I saw the Wicked Witch, he told me "Look, Matt, Its Hillary!" If she wins, I'm moving to Canada.
 
At this point I don't think we can do any... or no, lets rephrase that. At this point anything is better than Bush.
 
DWA
At this point I don't think we can do any... or no, lets rephrase that. At this point anything is better than Bush.

Not Cheney.
My Social Studies Teacher
You know, personally, I am actually... very surprised... that no one has tried to assasinate Bush yet, and I am even more surprised that he has not been impeached. Are you guys surprised too? ("YES!!!") Well, I actually hope that never happens ("WTF" look from class) because if we get rid of Bush, than we have Cheney. And in my opinion, he would be a heck of a lot worse than Bush...
 
Well duh... just don't give Cheney a gun. That or cut his meds off so he can't take Bush's place.

Only two more... erm, 1 more year people. :banghead:
 
DWA
Well duh... just don't give Cheney a gun. That or cut his meds off so he can't take Bush's place.

Only two more... erm, 1 more year people. :banghead:

This guy listens to The Daily Show all day. It shows in his educated response. I may be a partisan, but I really hope this does not represent the opposition base of the Democratic party. I expect some sort of intelligence, just a little.
 
Did I hit a Republican sore note? Well... I think I'm gonna head over to the independent party since they seemed to have the best ideas...
 
DWA
Did I hit a Republican sore note? Well... I think I'm gonna head over to the independent party since they seemed to have the best ideas...

Are you going to start your own political party? There is no such thing as an "Independent party". In the United States, being an "Independent" is having no relation or affiliation towards any political party. Joseph Lieberman left the Democratic party to become an Independent in the United States Senate, he has no political party.

You should check with your school counselor to see if there are any political science courses available.
 
Have presidential candidates been getting worse every years since, like, Reagan? Seems like it.

That sounds accurate. The last couple elections, I've wondered "300 million people, and we get stuck between these two guys?"

A Democratic Party and a Republican Party isn't enough. I mean, we have other parties, the problem is that not enough people seem to support them, so we essentially get stuck between two people for President every election.
 
Aren't Obama and Clinton both democrats? Haha, that can't be a pretty site in the running debate. Who's our Republicans?
 
Are you going to start your own political party? There is no such thing as an "Independent party". In the United States, being an "Independent" is having no relation or affiliation towards any political party. Joseph Lieberman left the Democratic party to become an Independent in the United States Senate, he has no political party.

You should check with your school counselor to see if there are any political science courses available.



Being Independent is free of any political party.

You can be associated with other political parties, you just dont run under their label. For example Lieberman is listed in Senate records as an "Independent Democrat." He's also speculated to be teaming up with McCain, a republican, for the up coming election.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16530615/


http://www.usnews.com/usnews/opinion/baroneblog/archives/060810/a_mccainlieberm.htm

There're other articles but I dont feel like looking for them.
 
You can be associated with other political parties, you just dont run under their label. For example Lieberman is listed in Senate records as an "Independent Democrat." He's also speculated to be teaming up with McCain, a republican, for the up coming election.

I suppose so, but you couldn't be truly independent if you're associated with a party.

McCain/Lieberman? Give me another reason why not to vote for McCain!

Clinton? eh... I don't know much about her - but Obama has my vote and the votes of about 39.7 million other people, give or take a few (1-10), on lock.

What makes you say that he has some 30 million votes, guaranteed? 30 million will not win you a presidential election in the United States.
 
Something about her rubs me the wrong way...... Everytime I think of Hillary Clinton, I think of Soviet Union. VERY BIG government. I'm very interested in what Senator Obama has to say, but I don't know anything about him.

Two main things I'd look for in the next President: 1) Economic policy toward China. 2) How he/she will deal with the Islamic Extremists(not just Iraq).
 
Maybe we should get a five party system going here.

I'm thinking Hillary will not get anywhere. 1) It's Hillary. 2) Obama is running.
 
Of Hilary Clinton does win, this is whats going to happen:

DJ4PSAUMBYXBK6GXCB6IXRUZMYLVJIZJ.gif
 
On Clinton: Well, we're on the start of a very dark road of politics that are going to be dark, despicable, and bitterly contested not only between the Democratic candidates, but also the race between Democrat and Republican. If anything, Hillary Clinton isn't the worst candidate we could have for the Democratic party, but even I would rather have Obama, who really isn't any better whatsoever. What it comes down to is that Hillary is too weak on domestic policies that lean far too far towards socialism, and even worse, far more likely to start a "We are the World" foundation of America helping everyone while doing nothing around the planet... Break out the white candles!

On Obama: The good news is that Obama doesn't like Hillary, and the same feelings are reciprocated back from her. Granted, I don't think Obama is that bad of a guy. I find him respectable as a politician, however I pretty much disagree with every stance he has on policy be it domestic or international. Obama, IMO, is less-dangerous than Hillary in most respects, however I don't think he will serve the American public on the whole, but a very narrow portion of America that really receives no benefits for what he preaches.

On Edwards: John Edwards may be the sleeper candidate for the Democrats in 2008. For the most part he has been fairly vocal in his anti-Bush rhetoric, however he hasn't been a prominent figure in every national issue. He seems to be pretty likable on the surface to most people, and that is a good thing, however he too suffers from a bit too much of the Left-Juice, and will probably manage to turn back the clock on progress economically speaking.

---

...What of the GOP? IMO, there are really only two Republicans that stand a chance for the nomination, and they would likely serve each other well as President/Vice President.

On McCain: John McCain stands the best chance for maintaining votes from fairly traditional Republicans along with fairly moderate folks. McCain's strong point has always been with the military be it foreign or domestic defense. I think that will remain a key point in the strength that Republicans possess. However McCain has been a bit wishy-washy on Immigration and some economic policies, and that does pose an issue for me.

On Giuliani: Of all the candidates, I've already thrown my hat into the Rudy Giuliani ring. What Rudy offers is a good mix of both Democrat and Republican ideas, where he is fairly liberal on social issues such as gay rights and abortion, while extremely conservative on issues like defense and The War on Terror. If anything, Rudy is a modern-day candidate for the Bull-Moose party (Teddy Roosevelt), balancing the ticket and going for that core group of people who feel they don't fit into the mold of either party.

...I'm hoping that Giuliani can run for President with McCain as VP, as it would seem to be a sure-shot for continued GOP dominance with the executive branch...

---

BTW: Has anyone managed to realize that if we were to elect Hillary Clinton to President, it would only give the Terrorists an even greater reason to hate us?

(given their hatred of women of course...)
 
BTW: Has anyone managed to realize that if we were to elect Hillary Clinton to President, it would only give the Terrorists an even greater reason to hate us?

(given their hatred of women of course...)

No, they'd want her to get elected so they'd have an easier time committing their terrorist acts.
 
Back