Honda Integra (DC5) Type R [Premium] 2003

  • Thread starter Neddo
  • 5 comments
  • 5,496 views
4,478
hondaintegratyperfront2.jpg

hondaintegratyperback2.jpg
honda__integra_dc5_type_r_6_speed_fresh_from_japan_2003_7_lgw.jpg
533860.jpg

    • Honda Integra Type-R, manufactured or sold in 2003, version for Japan (since mid-year 2003)
    • 3-door coupe body type
    • FWD (front-wheel drive), manual 6-speed gearbox
    • petrol (gasoline) engine with displacement: 1998 cm3 / 122.4 cui, advertised power: 162 kW / 217 hp / 220 PS ( JIS net ), Torque net: 206 Nm / 152 lb-ft
    • characteristic dimensions: outside length: 4385 mm / 172.6 in, wheelbase: 2570 mm / 101.2 in
    • reference weights: base curb weight: 1170 kg / 2579 lbs
    • how fast is this car ? top speed: 244 km/h (152 mph) (theoretical);
    • accelerations: 0- 60 mph 5.9 s; 0- 100 km/h 6.5 s (a-c simulation); 1/4 mile drag time (402 m) 14.5 s (a-c simulation)
    • fuel consumption and mileage: 8.1 l/100km / 35 mpg (imp.) / 29.1 mpg (U.S.) / 12.4 km/l average estimated by a-c: 12.1 l/100km / 23.3 mpg (imp.) / 19.4 mpg (U.S.) / 8.3 km/l
http://www.automobile-catalog.com/make/honda/integra_4gen/integra_4gen_phase-i_type-r/2003.html
 
@JASON_ROCKS1998 We have 2004 already. But I find this design more nostalgic! And more people will relate to it. We need one premium pre facelift DC5.
"More nostalgic"? There's 2 years between them and the only difference is the taillights! I see NO reason for the 2004 model to be premiumized when we have the 2006 model as premium.
 
Why when we have the identical '06 version which is exactly the same but with different taillights?
which is exactly the same but with different taillights?
exactly the same but
You just contradicted yourself.

What Neddo is asking for is that the pre-facelifted Integra (which if you actually paid any attention to the car, you'd see that they're not the same) be made into premium. Be it personal reasons or just plain preference, there is nothing wrong with suggesting this. Now if it was an identical car with no explicit differences, then I could see why this would be a redundant suggestion, but this isn't the case.
 
Back