This question is mainly to the people who dont know life without the internet...
For me I was about 25 when i first used the internet, 40 now..eek...
I know the question was addressed to those who 'don't know life' without the Internet, which then cuts me out (since I
did know life without the Internet) and life without the Internet was quite different - much as Presidents without television had only radio to rely on.
Life, however, continually evolves - and gives us different lifestyles as we pass through this world. There was a time I would hardly use the phone (which was chained to my desk.) Now I carry it around on me - eventually I will have it on my wrist, and then (maybe in the next ten years) have a chip in my head.
When I first used the Internet, my computer actually used floppies and the world-wide web was merely a novelty on which we played text-based RPGs.
As the world-wide Internet gained accessibility and efficiency many then followed the technology and the internet became more than a tool for gaming or education but also a means of socializing, or - to put it another way - a means to reach out and touch and be touched (quite vital for humanity.) Humans (usually) don't like to be alone.
So this brings us to a point: Loneliness, and the use of the internet, is linked.
This is not to say that all lonely people are addicted to the Internet, or that all internet users are lonely - but that it is a facet of its use - and continued existence.
In my life I'm never left alone - there is always someone (or something) IRL that requires my attention - and so the Internet is not so much a means to reach out and touch and be touched but more a handy piece of tech that offers me a plethora of tools in communicating with others world-wide (when I have to), educating myself about the collective consciousness and the general psyche of today's society, and, sometimes, a means to play some game or another with other human beings who
may not even be real human beings.
From that point of view the Internet really doesn't offer me much. Books, a regular phone line, a radio or a TV set can take the place of many things the internet offers. This means the world-wide web is only a side dish to me - not the main course.
The main course satisfies a few more senses than the Internet does.
Now
that should be a springboard for sufficient discussion, no?