Is Gran Turismo safe from Bill Gates?

  • Thread starter Earth
  • 14 comments
  • 1,375 views
8,018
GTP_Royalton
Is Gran Turismo really safe from Microsoft?

They've managed to buy into the Final Fantasy Franchise which is just as big if not bigger then Gran Turismo so why not Gran Turismo?

The only thing saving GT from being on a Microsoft console is probably, believe it or not, Forza. Because believe me if it weren't for the 360 having a decent driving sim GT would be on the Red ring of death console by now.
 
Since Gran Turismo is produced for Sony I don't think there would be any chance of seeing it on Xbox even if Forza did not excist..
 
Yes, this is why:

Polyphony Digital Inc. is an internal video game developing company of Sony Computer Entertainment and is part of the newly formed Sony World Studios.

Unless Microsoft wants to buy Sony, lol.

I dont see why Microsoft buying into Final Fantasy has any bearing on anything. Square Enix have always been independant.
 
Yes, this is why:

Polyphony Digital Inc. is an internal video game developing company of Sony Computer Entertainment and is part of the newly formed Sony World Studios.

Unless Microsoft wants to buy Sony, lol.

I dont see why Microsoft buying into Final Fantasy has any bearing on anything. Square Enix have always been independant.

That's good to hear. I now see why Sony is buying all new developers, if not they will leave you
 
That's good to hear. I now see why Sony is buying all new developers, if not they will leave you

Nah, Sony have been buying developers ever since they entered the console market, so have Nintendo, Sega...everyone does it.
 
Nah, Sony have been buying developers ever since they entered the console market, so have Nintendo, Sega...everyone does it.

Not at this pace, they bought Evolution studios shortly after they made Motorstorm and are about to gobble up the LBP guys if they haven't already.

They're focusing on 1st party games now because 3rd party guys will all go multiplatform soon
 
Not at this pace, they bought Evolution studios shortly after they made Motorstorm and are about to gobble up the LBP guys if they haven't already.

They're focusing on 1st party games now because 3rd party guys will all go multiplatform soon

I disagree, 3rd party developers are heading to the Wii, as it has effectively replaced the PS2 as the popular, family console, where they can churn out hundreds of licenced games for cheap.
 
I disagree, 3rd party developers are heading to the Wii, as it has effectively replaced the PS2 as the popular, family console, where they can churn out hundreds of licenced games for cheap.
When you discuss the Wii you might as well be discussing a completely different market. I mean, EA is even making their sports games differently for the Wii (complete with sub titles) than they are on the PS3 and 360.

What Earth is referring to is the trend for third-party exclusives to go multiplatform (like Final Fantasy and Crash Bandicoot) because development costs are so much more now that the developers need to recoup the costs. Sony themselves have said that they are now adjusting to focus more on first-party titles because it is too expensive to pay for an exclusive and there is no financial benefit to third-party devs to make an exclusive (unless it is MGS4 huge, that is).

What third-parties are doing on the Wii is completely different from what Earth is talking about. I can guarantee you that not a single GTA4 or MGS4 sale was lost to Wii Fit, just as no Gran Turismo 5 Prologue sale was lost to Mario Kart Wii. The Wii is not stealing a whole lot of the pie, because they made the pie bigger by bringing in gamers that weren't normally there before now.

I mean, do you know anyone with multiple systems that bought some crappy Wii shovelware, like Say Carnival Games, over a 360 or PS3 title?
 
The Wii is not stealing a whole lot of the pie, because they made the pie bigger by bringing in gamers that weren't normally there before now.

More than that, the Wii is an entirely different pie in an entirely different shop, to expand your analogy!

I very much doubt consumers choose between the Wii and the PS3/360, they either want the Wii with no desire whatsoever for the others (casual gamers and everyone else, families, grannies you name it), or the Wii and the others (game enthusiasts).

I doubt that the Wii has stolen any market from the PS3 or 360 whatsoever as it's created an entirely new games market. The DS has done the same to be honest, I work in an electronics shop and last Christmas people were buying DSs for their very young kids, and other people were buying DSs for their grandparents!
 
I doubt that the Wii has stolen any market from the PS3 or 360 whatsoever as it's created an entirely new games market. The DS has done the same to be honest, I work in an electronics shop and last Christmas people were buying DSs for their very young kids, and other people were buying DSs for their grandparents!

Ok, I agree that the Wii is a seperate market...but that doesnt change the fact that the vast majority of licenced games mostly aimed at kids are now aimed at the Wii rather than the 360 or PS3 because it is vastly cheaper to work on and it is more popular.
You're all talking about 3rd party as in the major 3rd party publishers, Im talking about the lesser ones, the ones the churned out the hundreds of millions of awful games for the PS1 and PS2. Like it or not, some of these games do sell.

Im not saying EA or any of the other larger companies dont or wont go multiplatform, most of them already have been doing for the past 10 years or more.

Oh, and the DS dominates its market, its not really making a seperate one, its the fact that the PSP has absolutely nothing. The only reason its still around is because of its excellent multimedia capablities and the firmware hacks. I dont think the PSP can even be considered to be in the same market, its not really a portable console, at least, its not making money from that. The DS hasnt done anything to move away from the standard market, its the competition that have.
 
Ok, I agree that the Wii is a seperate market...but that doesnt change the fact that the vast majority of licenced games mostly aimed at kids are now aimed at the Wii rather than the 360 or PS3 because it is vastly cheaper to work on and it is more popular.

Don't worry I wasn't argueing with you on that, I was kinda going off-topic really. I have noticed that there have hundreds of Wii games out in quite a short space of time and many of them are quite "kiddy", but then Nintendo have always really dominated the kiddy market anyway. It's the reason I never got a Game Cube or N64, because despite the occasional brilliant title, most of the games were really childish. So nothing has really changed, it just happens that the Wii is successful because they've genuinely innovated.
 
I disagree, 3rd party developers are heading to the Wii, as it has effectively replaced the PS2 as the popular, family console, where they can churn out hundreds of licensed games for cheap.

Keep in mind some of those cheap games are crappy.
 
I disagree, 3rd party developers are heading to the Wii, as it has effectively replaced the PS2 as the popular, family console, where they can churn out hundreds of licenced games for cheap.

Yes, but with so many cheap titles being churned out, no single one will stand out and thus they'll all get mediocre to terrible sales.
 
bill gates "left" microsoft. so yes, GT is safe from him. as far as MS goes, i guess thats already been covered in the first 10 posts.
 
Ok, I agree that the Wii is a seperate market...but that doesnt change the fact that the vast majority of licenced games mostly aimed at kids are now aimed at the Wii rather than the 360 or PS3 because it is vastly cheaper to work on and it is more popular.
When you say licensed do you mean like the ones based of kids movies and cartoons? Because those are all going on all three (four if you count the PS2, six if you count the portables) systems.

You're all talking about 3rd party as in the major 3rd party publishers, Im talking about the lesser ones, the ones the churned out the hundreds of millions of awful games for the PS1 and PS2. Like it or not, some of these games do sell.
But the thing is they didn't do anything great for the PS1 or PS2. They are an almost a non-factor and now with Wii-Ware and Sony allowing PSN titles to be independently published they will be even less effective. Now if one of these small companies decided to take a risk and go for a blockbuster, then it would be a big deal.

Im not saying EA or any of the other larger companies dont or wont go multiplatform, most of them already have been doing for the past 10 years or more.
It isn't the fact that companies are multiplatform that is the attention grabber, because that is nothing new. It is the fact that exclusive titles created by third-parties are becoming fewer and fewer, and long-standing exclusives are now going multiplatform. Final Fantasy XIII and other PS3 360 titles would not likely work on the Wii. It is these blockbusters that are the concern.

Oh, and the DS dominates its market, its not really making a seperate one,
It does both. Brain Age is not stealing sales from Chains of Olympus. The popularity of the DS is because it is relevant for both hardcore and casual gamers.

Nintendo has been absolutely brilliant with the DS and making it interact with the Wii was a great move. Now if only the rest of the Wii's communications abilities were there.

its the fact that the PSP has absolutely nothing. The only reason its still around is because of its excellent multimedia capablities and the firmware hacks. I dont think the PSP can even be considered to be in the same market, its not really a portable console, at least, its not making money from that. The DS hasnt done anything to move away from the standard market, its the competition that have.
You must be using a different PSP than me. I have four games on UMD, one downloaded, and eight official PS1 ports. I am also wanting to buy two more games on UMD sometime in the near future.

And I have none of those peripherals that are available in the rest of the world. I only truly used its multimedia abilities to play movies on my Hawaii trip and then to use it as a portable slideshow viewer so friends and family could see my Hawaii pictures.

The PSP has plenty of gaming potential, which is only bigger with Remote Play and its own PSN Store.

All that said though, once we get the peripherals here in the US it will be a much more well-rounded system and have plenty of features and content to make it useful for everything.

Keep in mind some of those cheap games are crappy.
Fixed that for ya.
 
Back