GTjazzabrandy
(Banned)
- 609
It will be. This car is a big mix of Gallardo & Murcie. structures right now with the new items.Lookin good. I just hope it's less polygonal and more clean.
It will be shorter in wheelbase as well more "green" from what I hear.Looks a lot leaner than the Murcielago. Looks great so far!
It will be shorter in wheelbase as well more "green" from what I hear.
And sadder news, like Ferrari, the 6-speed gearbox is dead from here-on.
I know, but like Ferrari again, only producing one gearbox cuts production costs by a good margin as the rear ends have to be re-engineered for the 6-speeds.Bah. This is terrible. I hope they realize there are many people who prefer the proper 3 pedal layout even though the flappy paddles can shift much faster. There's something more satisfying with having a proper manual than clicking a simple paddle in my opinion.
But call the car something else, please.
Yeh... It just doesn't sound as it's predecessors... Needs something more flary and in-your-face than "Jota" which just puts a picture of a volkswagon in my mind for some reason......
They've never used Historic model names, anyway. There's gotta be another fighting bull out there somewhere...
I'm also horridly concerned about that "Sideblade" on the camo.
The Miura was a celebration of our history, but Lamborghini is about the future. Retro design is not what we are here for. So we wont do the Miura.
^I fail to see how an engine of that much displacement and power can be green. Unless they do that cylinder shut off, ninja hybrid sort of thing.
It'll probably be the same when the Diablo 6.0 was really just re-engineered to a 6.2-liter.Lambo manuals tended to suck anyways. I'm still sad about the loss of the V12, though. Unless it is a "new" engine like the Bentley Mulsanne has a "new" engine. Then I'll be fine with it.
But call the car something else, please.
Jota was a name given more to limited edition, high performance models as well, so I don't believe Lamborghini would signify the new car as such.Jota is a historic Lamborghini name. Just one step away from Miura.
But the fact that it's a historic model name is a good reason not to use the name.
You do realize more Diablos were sold with the VT system than RWD, right? Or that 70% of the power in the VT system is sent to the rears, so it can still snap away.I'm hoping for less than 3000 lbs and RWD. I still indentify Lamborghini with RWD like the Diablo despite their change of heart with the Murcielago and Gallardo. It's just a better a drivetrain, especially for an overpowered supercar.
You do realize more Diablos were sold with the VT system than RWD, right? Or that 70% of the power in the VT system is sent to the rears, so it can still snap away.
AWD has been one of the cars biggest selling factors because it helps keep them planted very well. Planting RWD-only in a car like the Murcielago would be a quick way to overwhelm the numerous amount of wealthy folks who buy them seeing as they still pull off stunts like this.I have no idea about the ratio of RWD to AWD Diablo's, but no matter how much power goes to the rear, there's still 200 lbs of weight up front.
AWD isn't a bad thing, it just doesn't seem to fit Lamborghini (even if it is now a core part of their cars).
AWD has been one of the cars biggest selling factors because it helps keep them planted very well. Planting RWD-only in a car like the Murcielago would be a quick way to overwhelm the numerous amount of wealthy folks who buy them seeing as they still pull off stunts like this.