Look, it's the Hyundai SL500!

  • Thread starter -Fred-
  • 22 comments
  • 2,764 views

-Fred-

This is a custom title
Staff Emeritus
25,084
Canada
Somewhere.
37823.jpg

37817.jpg

37818.jpg

37819.jpg

37820.jpg

37821.jpg

37822.jpg

37824.jpg

37825.jpg

37516.jpg


The Tiburon coupe had a definitive Ferrari-esque shape, this one's looking like a Benz. Which, incidentally, might not be a bad thing. It's still a concept, but it could become a 2005 Tiburon cabrio. Mechanically it's the same as the coupe.

Who'd have thought, just 5 years ago, that Hyundais could look that good?
 
That top picture is very Maserati-esque. vat_man agrees with me, and if he doesn't, I change my viewpoint to his.

Hyundai's a competitor! I've always believed in the XG350 and Elantra, but little else until the new Tibby - this just rules!
 
Originally posted by M5Power
That top picture is very Maserati-esque. vat_man agrees with me, and if he doesn't, I change my viewpoint to his.

Hyundai's a competitor! I've always believed in the XG350 and Elantra, but little else until the new Tibby - this just rules!

No need to change, Douglas - I agree. Proportions and the guards are very reminiscent of recent Maseratis - wheels seem to help the impression.

Don't know about the 'lights within headlights' treatment, but otherwise it's quite a pretty thing.
 
Originally posted by vat_man

Don't know about the 'lights within headlights' treatment, but otherwise it's quite a pretty thing.
I like it - cheaper to replace the casing than a light or bulb if/when it breaks, I assume. I never thought it to be an issue for stylistic judgement, though I can see how it's a bit questionable the way they made it.

By the way, what's the point of a hardtop on this thing? They're already losing the power race - Eclipse has 210, Celica has 180, RSX has 200 (to Hyundai's 170) - Hyundai's point is value. I feel the obviously expensive hardtop goes against it. Shame!
 
Originally posted by M5Power
I like it - cheaper to replace the casing than a light or bulb if/when it breaks, I assume. I never thought it to be an issue for stylistic judgement, though I can see how it's a bit questionable the way they made it.

By the way, what's the point of a hardtop on this thing? They're already losing the power race - Eclipse has 210, Celica has 180, RSX has 200 (to Hyundai's 170) - Hyundai's point is value. I feel the obviously expensive hardtop goes against it. Shame!

I just assumed it was a Korean obsession with four headlight front ends - remember the facelift of the previous coupe?

Re the hardtop - well, if you're trying drag yourself out of the 'cheap car' class as Hyundai are at the moment, putting in 'sexy' features like a folding hardtop on your image leader's probably not a bad way to go.
 
Until they get the power and drivetrain sorted, it's not on my shopping list - it had a bendy body in coupe version, I don't want to think about the flex in the convertable.
 
Really nice look if you ask me. I think that the wheels definitely help the Maserati look. I wish my Tib looked like that...
 
Uh - something I just noticed - there are two distinct versions of the car shown there. All but the last shot are of a car with a retractable glass roof hardtop, and then the bottom shot shows a regular Tiburon with a more normal folding hard-top. What gives?
 
Originally posted by vat_man

Re the hardtop - well, if you're trying drag yourself out of the 'cheap car' class as Hyundai are at the moment, putting in 'sexy' features like a folding hardtop on your image leader's probably not a bad way to go.

I guess, but you could either have the hardtop Hyundai with 170hp or the soft-top Mitsubishi with 210 - given Hyundai's current reputation (still) I think potential buyers would rather have the Mitsubishi (or, if Toyota made a convertible Celica, that).
 
Originally posted by M5Power
I guess, but you could either have the hardtop Hyundai with 170hp or the soft-top Mitsubishi with 210 - given Hyundai's current reputation (still) I think potential buyers would rather have the Mitsubishi (or, if Toyota made a convertible Celica, that).

True enough - any idea what resale on the Tiburon is?

There's plenty of the previous model coupe running around, but Tiburons are a bit thin on the ground. They're too dear here - they're in Integra-Celica territory, and it's not that big a stretch from the V6 models (which battle the MX-5 and the MG-F) to a Holden Monaro.
 
Originally posted by vat_man
True enough - any idea what resale on the Tiburon is?


It's hard to say - the old style was so horribly putrid that it probably suffers uncharacteristicly low resale, and the new style is too new to tell - it's certain to hold better than other Hyundais, maybe excepting the popular (for the US, at least) Santa Fe SUV.

There's plenty of the previous model coupe running around, but Tiburons are a bit thin on the ground. They're too dear here - they're in Integra-Celica territory, and it's not that big a stretch from the V6 models (which battle the MX-5 and the MG-F) to a Holden Monaro.

Interesting - they're very cheap here; Celicas (with only six more horsepower) start at $1k more than the 4-cylinder Tiburon; 180-horsepower Celicas are almost $4k more, and it's the same basic story over at Acura and Mitsubishi.

Miata is $3k more than the base model and only has eight more horsepower, but it's really more of an involving experience and I could be very easily persuaded that it's more than worth the $3k difference. I never really thought it to be a competitor, but it's not much of a stretch (if any at all).
 
Originally posted by M5Power


It's hard to say - the old style was so horribly putrid that it probably suffers uncharacteristicly low resale.[/B]

You're the only person that I've talked to that hates the old style so much. I'm not just saying that because I have one, I seriously think its a good looking car. Resale for a second gen around here is about 9-10 grand (US).
 
Originally posted by M5Power

By the way, what's the point of a hardtop on this thing? They're already losing the power race - Eclipse has 210, Celica has 180, RSX has 200 (to Hyundai's 170) - Hyundai's point is value. I feel the obviously expensive hardtop goes against it. Shame!

You have a point. The current Tiburons come in at $21k with the 2.7L V6 and a 6 speed manual transmission and every available option. The Eclipse GT (lowest priced model with the V6) costs $21,300 with a 3.0L V6 and a 5 speed tranny (and no other options). Add a few options to bring the Eclipse GT up to Tiburon level and you're looking at $23.5k. That's not including ABS (which comes as a package, couldn't find the price).


A similarly loaded Eclipse GTS weighs in at $24.8k.

40 less HP is a killer, but I'd rather have the Tiburon. I'm curious to see how expensive the new model will be.

Over the Celica GTS, the Tiburon is a steal. Only 10 more HP over the Tiburon, but $5k more (similarly optioned). Take that $26.2k Celica GTS.
 
Originally posted by Zrow
You're the only person that I've talked to that hates the old style so much. I'm not just saying that because I have one, I seriously think its a good looking car. Resale for a second gen around here is about 9-10 grand (US).
Nah - ask around. In fact I think I first noticed how awful the front end was from vat_man, from who I steal many of my stylistic opinions (especially about Japanese and Korean cars). Hyundai really does have a weird thing about front-ends - seen a Santa Fe recently? :odd: Not that it's any worse than the current Montero, but that actually looks decent - not sure why.

You have a point. The current Tiburons come in at $21k with the 2.7L V6 and a 6 speed manual transmission and every available option. The Eclipse GT (lowest priced model with the V6) costs $21,300 with a 3.0L V6 and a 5 speed tranny (and no other options). Add a few options to bring the Eclipse GT up to Tiburon level and you're looking at $23.5k. That's not including ABS (which comes as a package, couldn't find the price).

Mitsubishi sells a wonderful three options on Eclipses, but it's okay because the GT Eclipse is almost up to Tiburon spec level anyway. The options are the ever-popular Sun and Sound Package (not sure why manufacturers equate a sunroof and a sound system, but in any case, they charge plenty for it), the Sound and Leather Package (Infinity sound, power sunroof, and leather), and leather front seats - all are available on the GT hatch, and leather is the only thing it's really missing - call it $21,900. Antilock brakes are sadly unavailable, as are side airbags - more stupidity from the world's most mediocre carmaker (thanks for the new Galant, but it's already way behind and it isn't even out yet - ****ers).

Hyundai has that Infinity sound system standard, as it does front side airbags - ahh, a manufacturer that believes in what it sells enough to give it decent specification levels - both makes are low in customer satisfaction, but those studys are years old, from when Mitsubishi made a better Eclipse, and Hyundai made this:

000224_pr.jpg


Hyundai's improving, then. Anyway - as I said earlier in this thread, antilock brakes are standard on the GT if you're willing to lose the leather seats, but good luck finding a car so equipped - the only other package it's in is package 12 - $2048 for the manual (which is changed to a sport-shifty automatic and a sunroof added) and $1148 for the auto, which includes just the sunroof and the brakes. Not exactly a value, but whatever - I've noted more than a few budget carmakers don't equip ABS on cars with manual transmissions, though I'm once again unsure of why.
 
this hyundai look so good (almost perfect for me) they are realy improved with that sweetie.

:hyundai:👍
 
I'm impressed, it's good to finally see normal shaped headlights again. The airvent-thingies in the side need to go. I hate them.

Cool rims in the first 10 pictures.

Whose idea was it to put lights in the rear bumper? They need to cut that **** out.
 
This car with some info is going to be, in my Frankfurt motor show 2003 thread after a cople replys.
 

Latest Posts

Back