Mazda Protegé (BJ) ES 1999

[BJahalt88]

Engine:

• 1.8-liter Mazda FP-DE Inline-4.

Power:

• 122 hp (91 kW/124 PS) @ 6,000 rpm.

Torque:

• 120 lb-ft (163 Nm) @ 4,000 rpm.

Transmission:

• 5-speed manual.
• Ford 4F27E/Mazda FN4A-EL 4-speed automatic.

Final Drive Ratio:

• 5MT -- 4.100.
• 4AT -- 3.900.

Drivetrain:

• Front-wheel-drive.

Weight:

• 2,537 lbs (1,151 kg).

0-60 mph:

• 5MT -- 9.1 seconds.
• 4AT -- 10.4 seconds.

1/4-mile:

• 5MT -- 17 seconds @ 83 mph.
• 4AT -- 17.6 seconds @ 7.9 mph.

Top Speed:

• 5MT -- 125 mph (201 km/h).
• 4AT -- 117 mph (189 km/h).

Driving Range:

• 5MT -- 357 miles (575 km).
• 4AT -- 360 miles (580 km).

http://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1999/1672610/mazda_protege_es.html
http://en.wheelsage.org/mazda/protege/8910/exact/pictures/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazda_Familia#Eighth_generation_.28BJ.3B_1998.E2.80.932003.29

Click here for other Mazda Protegé models:
Mazda Protegé (BJ) MP3 2001
Mazda Protegé (BJ) 2.0ES 2002
Mazdaspeed Protegé (BJ) 2003

 

[BloodHawk]

Man, it doesn't even look like you make these threads because you want the cars in the game. Every single suggestion of yours during these last months have pictures and links to automobile-catalog.com, it looks like you are just posting anything you find there for no reason (or to farm for "likes").

Stop it! Please. Leave the job of creating a thread for these cars to the people that really want them in the game, I already got really pissed off when I found something I wanted to suggest and it was already posted by you, who doesn't even seem to show hard work and researches done with your threads, or even love for the cars you post.

 

[Neddo]

@BloodHawk He has some gems however. He and Harsk will suggest every car, every trim ever to exist. That's just the way it is

 

[BloodHawk]

@BloodHawk He has some gems however. He and Harsk will suggest every car, every trim ever to exist. That's just the way it is

But that's just annoying when someone legit wants to post something already suggested by him, just like I did.

And he has these "gems" because, like you said, he suggests every car that exists.

 

[MobilMalik]

@BloodHawk He has some gems however. He and Harsk will suggest every car, every trim ever to exist. That's just the way it is

Finding car database websites and posting every single vehicle you can find there, that's the way of BJahalt88, unfortunately.

 

[Neddo]

But that's just annoying when someone legit wants to post something already suggested by him, just like I did.

And he has these "gems" because, like you said, he suggests every car that exists.

He's legit enough. No wall of text, low pictures and titles are fine. No rudeness and complaining. Most relevant cars were suggested in first month of this section. Just blame luck if someone suggested something before.

 

[BloodHawk]

He's legit enough. No wall of text, low pictures and titles are fine. No rudeness and complaining. Most relevant cars were suggested in first month of this section. Just blame luck if someone suggested something before.

No he's not. By legit I mean someone who'd really like to see the cars they post being in the game, the member in question has never showed any trait of this (the other member you mentioned, Harsk, at least do so), moreover his threads always kinda looks like lazy work most of the time.

The "no wall of text" is pure laziness of researching about the vehicle or of even ctrl c + ctrl v together with proper credits for the author of the text. And about the pictures... Just look at all his threads, all from the same website he's been using to find cars to post for reasons that don't look right.

 

[Neddo]

No he's not. By legit I mean someone who'd really like to see the cars they post being in the game, the member in question has never showed any trait of this (the other member you mentioned, Harsk, at least do so), moreover his threads always kinda looks like lazy work most of the time.

The "no wall of text" is pure laziness of researching about the vehicle or of even ctrl c + ctrl v together with proper credits for the author of the text. And about the pictures... Just look at all his threads, all from the same website he's been using to find cars to post for reasons that don't look right.

I think there's nothing wrong with pictures at all. He just finds all pictures he needs in one site. On the other hand, threads are kinda lazy but not the laziest. It's about the car to me. I don't care aobut the quality of pictures or font, I care about car. I like suggestions because of cars not style.
Sometimes people suggest cars that they don't like but because they think it would make car list more versatile and interesting.

This car would be interesting to tune and drive in Sunday cup and manafacturer events. However I think this car has way better trims. But I guess it's not always about ultimate and fastest trims. I mean, if GT had only the fastest cars it wouldn't be that interesting.

 

[BloodHawk]

I think there's nothing wrong with pictures at all. He just finds all pictures he needs in one site.

Indeed, there's nothing wrong with it but it just helps with my whole point of him suggesting any car he finds at automobile-catalog.com.

On the other hand, threads are kinda lazy but not the laziest.

There are members nowadays that are still capable of making threads lazier than this guy, this is something I recognize but the members I'm referring to at least don't do what MobilMalik just said.

It's about the car to me. I don't care aobut the quality of pictures or font, I care about car. I like suggestions because of cars not style.

Me too, sometimes it's not possible to come up with good pictures, and I also like suggestions because of the car itself. But that's not the point of the whole arguing we're having.

Sometimes people suggest cars that they don't like but because they think it would make car list more versatile and interesting.

Doesn't make sense doing that, honestly, it really doesn't. Leave the job of making the thread for someone who likes the car then.