Toronado
Using the '96 was the first problem. The '98 can be tuned for more power and it weighs less. The second problem was stiffening the suspension. The 3rd problem was lowering the downforce all the way. My 3000GT (though I won't go into specifics) had full downforce rear and a little up front (it wont wheelie). The 4th was dropping the suspension front and rear. I raised mine front and dropped it rear. Also, was your 3000GT a 6.2 mile one? That adds about 45 BHP to the car.
I just tested with and without downforce. With full downforce on rear and slight front downforce my average 1st corner speed was 228 with and exit speed of 226, top speed 238. With 0 downforce, I got average 1st corner speed of 235, exit 234 , top 244. More downforce=more drag. More drag= lower speed
With the suspension I found some difference, both topped out at about 245, although I will admit your general setting did feel a little better, and left the corner faster, resulting in faster lap time but only slight mph gain. The 3000gt is heavy and less weight on the front helps corner speed. I am corrected
My thought process regarding the stance of the car has been disproven, it seems. I thought low all around would be much better than low rear high front, but I found little difference. The fact is a few millimeters dosn't make a huge difference.
Drag was the main concern for me, the air flowing under the car would be reduced by lower stance. High front/low rear would ,in theory, cause excess drag. More testing
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b6ab/8b6ab0b524cad723468a1a04426b21e3438aab3a" alt="Dopey :dopey: :dopey:"
is needed indeed
This was all done with my 96 3000gt with equal tranny settings, tires, ect.
Please give spec of your setting so I can try it
Your suspension settings were better, but my downforce settings were better
Test this and reply with your findings if you have nothing else to do
Thanks for the suspension help