My internet speed: very unhappy

  • Thread starter staniland
  • 43 comments
  • 3,620 views
13
stanthemanwhocan
BT says i get **upto** 24mbs, but as you can see im getting 3.37... anyone else have issues with BT and did you get it resolved?

 
You really aren't going to like this:

895471537.png


On a 7 Mbps down/.89 Mbps up. And to make it worse, my wife is streaming a movie on Netflix...

Have you power cycled the modem?

Did you just sign up for BT or have you had it a while and the speed just suddenly dropped?

Also, their site says that they will provide the maximum speed you line will support, up to 20Mb so it's possible you have bad wiring. Hopefully that's not it. 👎
 
I once complained that my connection was as slow as the old 56k dial-up service, they checked, sent an engineer, cable modem was the problem, once replaced it worked great.
resetting by turning off for 30 seconds can help in some cases. (some not all)



supposed to be on 10meg, so not great at the moment, probably busy this time in evening :(
I always test from/to the same server as I know what it should be telling me 99% of the time
 


That's on wireless, with a near dead router. Being next to Microsoft rocks.



Why is my upload faster than my download?!
 


My internet is devilishly quick.

Gam how come you tested on the same server as the OP it's 3400 miles away from you!?
 
908990667.png

This is from California to the UK server in Gloucester, 5250 miles away. :eek:
You need to get in touch with BT about that. ;)

I'm on a 10Mbps Up/down symmetric fibre-optic link at home.
908993214.png
 
We already have a thread for the Speed Tests.

But I had a problem with bad micro filters, unplugging my sky box boosted my connection.
 
909039894.png


This is on an 'up to 8Mb' service.

Something is wrong, maybe time I got a new router/modem thingy (Whatever you call it), because the speed has slowly got worse since we signed up to it, and now it's pretty much unbearable.
 
i used to get between 1 and 2 mbs, untill i got playstation plus, and i swear its been a constant 4.5 ever since.

 
909185477.png


O2, know that I love you.


As for the OP, my house is on an 'up to 24mb' package with BT and gets just under 1. The most likely factor is how far you are from the phone exchange. Whack your postcode in here and see how far yours is from you. As a comparison, my house with 1mb/s is nearly 3 miles away from the exchange, and my student flat with 11mb/s is about 3/4 of one.
 
Last edited:



Mine sucks. We really need to change. What do you guys suggest my family have narrowed it down to two O2 or talktalk. What do you guys suggest.

and its faster to download from Melbourne than London.
 
Yeah people get suckered into internet speeds. I'm not sure what technology is used in other countries but here ADSL2+ is the primary form of transmission. It is generally advertised as 24000/1000 speeds.

However, it is not a guaranteed speed, and highly depends on distance to the exchange. As Jondot said previously, you can get shocking speeds on a 'Up To 24000' connection. I personally at home get about 13000. You won't get the full speed unless you literally live next door to the exchange, and even then it's impossible to get the maximum advertised speed.
 
As for the OP, my house is on an 'up to 24mb' package with BT and gets just under 1. The most likely factor is how far you are from the phone exchange. Whack your postcode in here and see how far yours is from you. As a comparison, my house with 1mb/s is nearly 3 miles away from the exchange, and my student flat with 11mb/s is about 3/4 of one.

And the line length can be very different from the direct distance.
I'm around 3.5km from the exchange, but my line length is about 7.5km.
Which is why this is the best I can get: :grumpy:

909410026.png
[/URL][/IMG]
 
I am on a upto 24mbs ADSL2+ conection too and because I am a little over 5km's away from the exchange (varified by the ISP) I get around 5-5.5mbs.
 
Almost no-one I know in the UK gets anything like the "up to" speeds advertised by the providers. But then "up to" is the maximum you could possibly expect and doesn't reflect what your line supports.

If you go here and tap in your phone number (more accurate) or postcode (less accurate), BT will tell you what the maximum speed they think your line can support is. We have an "up to 8Mb" package with PlusNet, BT rate our line to 1.5Mb, my router reports 1.56Mb and Speedtest.net give us 1.2Mb to Manchester.

Sam Knows is also terribly good if you're into tech details. Essentially, if many/most/all ISPs listed under the LLU section (Local Loop Unbundled) are checked as being able to provide you a service, you can expect to be able to get higher speeds than if many/most/all are crossed - a non-LLU BT exchange cannot provide speeds higher than 8Mb at the exchange itself, never mind 5km away. Our exchange is, on the whole, a non-LLU exchange, though Be. are unbundled and we may be able to receive an "up to 24Mb" service from them (if we lived on the exchange).
 
Well that kinda sucks the best I can get is 1.5mb.

Which would make paying for "up to 24Mb" O2 or TalkTalk a bit of a waste for your parents, really.

Don't be suckered by headline speeds - if you're already on "up to 8Mb" but your line can support only 1.5Mb, pick a company that offers the best "up to 8Mb". Best may mean cheapest - in our case we went for a company with good reviews for stability, uptime and customer support, and we have a stable, permanently up connection which they've fallen over themselves to keep working at our end.


If your exchange is unbundled for O2/TalkTalk/Be. then you may be able to get faster speeds as they insert some of their own hardware at your local exchange - use their phone line checkers on their websites to find out. The copper pair from the exchange to your house is still BT's however and perhaps the biggest factor in what is lost on the way.

Oh, also, The Daily Mash is as accurate as ever on this topic (language warning - it's the Daily Mash!).
 
Last edited:
Eeexactly, and some companies just aren't set up to deal a stable connection. Tiscali used to be the worst offenders for it, and now they've merged into TalkTalk who I can only assume are even worse. We've had BT broadband for something like 3 years and it's been excellent - even if the company its self is hateful. The only issues I've had with it have (as it turns out) been down to the router. It'd be nice to see O2 behave in a similar away - I seem to remember Be getting excellent reviews prior to the O2 takeover, so let's hope it continues.
 


Looks like my download speed is pretty high. Other notes, it seems I'm running a Canadian server, yet I'm in the U.S. And I have the fastest download out of the ones you've posted (Jondot, you're off by .25).
 
Your ISP/server can be hundreds of miles away but it depends on how close you are to your local phone line exchange (assuming it is a phone line you're internet is going through).
 
No, you just opted to test on a Canadian server. But this thread isn't about who has the best download speed, as TB has already pointed out. It's about helping people (originally the OP) who aren't getting the download speeds they think they ought.
 
Jay
Your ISP/server can be hundreds of miles away but it depends on how close you are to your local phone line exchange (assuming it is a phone line you're internet is going through).

Indeed, DSL speed is limited by cable length, which is why, as I've shown on the previous page, by testing to the same server as the OP, I can get double his download speed and 6 times his upload speed despite being 105 times further away from the server than he is, and using a wireless connection, because I'm using a fibre-optic link since we're living in a relatively new development which was built in 2003 with fibre-optic provisions for phone, broadband (I could get up to 1Gbps if I felt like forking over $300 / month for the priviledge! :eek:) and cable TV.



under 50 miles.... shocking speed...

908990667.png

This is from California to the UK server in Gloucester, 5250 miles away. :eek:
You need to get in touch with BT about that. ;)

Unfortunately as has been described here, until BT gets round to upgrading their wiring or installing fibre-optics, you're stuck with what you've got. I suspect that's a massively costly undertaking and won't happen anytime soon, especially outside of major population centres.
I don't know if it'd be worth investigating a wireless satellite connection to give better speeds? Many mobile phones in the US now offer a tethering option allowing you to connect to the internet on your laptop via the mobile connection, although I'm sure this is pretty costly, but my company pays for it for most of it's remote employees.
 
I went through something similar a couple years ago. After quite a few line techs and other techs coming out to the house, the issue ended up being the router they gave me. Regardless you NEED to call them and have someone come out to the house. After all my problems I ended up with 3 months of free internet.
 
God I love being in a fibre optic area. Which I'm assuming is solely because we host a fairly large Virgin Media call centre in Swansea, along with Admiral insurance and a fair few others.

Upto 10mb, 2.7 miles by road (assuming wiring follows main road), and I get...


[EDIT]
Ofcom
31. To achieve this Principle in action, the ISPs must ensure the following:

Those ISPs using technologies such as DSL for which the access line speed can be lower than the headline speed should:



Have a robust process for identifying whether the problem relates to a slower than expected access line speed;
Log the problem as a technical fault if diagnostics indicate that this is appropriate;
If it appears from the diagnostics that the problem is likely to have resulted from factors within the customer's control, e.g. internal wiring, the ISP should advise the customer of that fact and how such problems could be eased;
If, after following the procedures i, ii and iii above, the customer continues to receive an access line speed significantly lower than the estimate provided at point of sale the ISPs should offer the customer with an alternative broadband package. This measure only applies where the ISPs offer their subscribers a lower speed package than that originally signed up to. Consumers should not incur any change of package penalty in order to migrate onto a different broadband package under these circumstances other than those charges that would have applied had they signed up to that lower package in the first instance.
 
Last edited:
No, you just opted to test on a Canadian server. But this thread isn't about who has the best download speed, as TB has already pointed out. It's about helping people (originally the OP) who aren't getting the download speeds they think they ought.

I know this. But actually, no that's the server it told me I was currently running on. From Ontario. Other than this I don't know much about computers.
 
Back