My site again

Why frames, especially since you only use one frameset? It makes it really hard for people used to tabbed browsing (since the "open in a new tab" function is effectively blocked within framed-based sites). I'm not against frame-based sites or anything, but it seems kind of pointless when there's only one frameset anyway.

And don't you think the copyright stuff is a bit much? The Javascript in particular... if someone wants the image, they can just take a screenshot.
 
Well, here's your own source code:

Code:
<html>

  <head>
    <title>Sunny Mangat</title>
    <meta name="description" content="This is a graphical resource, providing wallpapers, games and soon tutorials.">
    <meta name="keywords" content="Sunny Mangat, games, graphical, mangat, photoshop, sunny, sunnymangat, web">

<script language = "JavaScript">
  <!-- hide start
  function popup() {
    window.open("http://banners.dot.tk/banner?fldpromonr=1&fldbannernr=0&flddomainnr=2680539","bannerpopup","height=100,width=486");
  }
  // hide end -->
</script>

  </head>

  <frameset onLoad="JavaScript:popup()" rows="*,1" framespacing="0" border="0" frameborder="NO">
    [color=darkred]<frame src="http://www.kinesophobia.com/sunny/" name="dot_tk_frame_content" scrolling="auto" noresize>[/color]
  </frameset>

  <noframes>
    <body>
    </body>
  </noframes>

</html>
 
Originally posted by Super-Supra
That's the .tk frame. It's just the URL cloaking thing.

http://www.kinesophobia.com/sunny/

This URL doesn't have any frames.
Oh, ok... in that case, you might to reference that link, since the single frameset thing is yucky poo poo.

Two more things:

On the home page, the news is way, way, way down there, because of your navigation bar... either use CSS to make a two-column design, use tables to make a two-column design, or make a horizontal navigation bar. The setup you have here is discouraging to a visitor, because there's vast expanses of wasted space.

On the note of the navigation bar, make them rollover images instead of SWF files... the parameter and object junk used for SWF files bulks up code to a huge extent (Javascript code for rollover images is also bulky, but nowhere near as bulky).
 
Originally posted by Mr. Snowtire
Hack much Sage?;)
Nope! :P Viewing a site's source code is something that's built into the browser, ya know... ;)
 
Originally posted by Sage
Oh, ok... in that case, you might to reference that link, since the single frameset thing is yucky poo poo.

Two more things:

On the home page, the news is way, way, way down there, because of your navigation bar... either use CSS to make a two-column design, use tables to make a two-column design, or make a horizontal navigation bar. The setup you have here is discouraging to a visitor, because there's vast expanses of wasted space.

On the note of the navigation bar, make them rollover images instead of SWF files... the parameter and object junk used for SWF files bulks up code to a huge extent (Javascript code for rollover images is also bulky, but nowhere near as bulky).

On my index page. The ENTER button is a rollover.

Mah. I don't like flash that much anymore. I'm gonna use HTML or CSS on my version 2.
 
Like Sage said, its very ahem...spread out. Try moving things together and putting the menu right by the news, etc. Just a bit of centering. Not only will it look better, people with lower resolutions won't have as much trouble seeing all of the website.

Much better than your last 200 incarnations.
 
Yeah. I don't know how to do that table stuff. So I kept it basic. I'm gonna try to use CSS on my v2. But I'm in the process of learning how to use it.
 
Originally posted by Cobraboy
Were you not able to get the images to match the background colour (or vice versa)? It seems to stand out quite a bit.. :odd:
Your talking about the top image right?

I just noticed that this morning.
 
Originally posted by Super-Supra
Ok, so the buttom and top?

All of them, every single one.

Maybe it has something to do with my browser (IE 6) in which case you havent really catered for mulitple browser use..
 
Even though the quality went down in compressing it's still very much the same as what IE is giving me.
 

Attachments

  • untitled-2.jpg
    untitled-2.jpg
    46.3 KB · Views: 51
Your "articles" are a bit short. :odd: And...uh...why does the copyright link me to write an email? How many versions have you gone through? Eleventy billion? Apart from that, it looks okay. I guess.
 
Originally posted by DODGE the VIPER
Your "articles" are a bit short. :odd: And...uh...why does the copyright link me to write an email? How many versions have you gone through? Eleventy billion? Apart from that, it looks okay. I guess.

Yes, I have gone through like a billion designs. But not any more.

I'm not gonna design that much anymore.:rolleyes:

Yes, the articles are small. I don't feel like writing that much, at the moment.
 
The links on your links page don't work. Every link highlights when you move the mouse onto one of them, but nothing happens when you click.
 
Originally posted by daan
The links on your links page don't work. Every link highlights when you move the mouse onto one of them, but nothing happens when you click.

Yes, It would've taken to long to create each and every link, so I just made it a rollover, with the links on it.

I'll have better links that actually link, on my v2.
 
Originally posted by Super-Supra
Yeah. I don't know how to do that table stuff. So I kept it basic. I'm gonna try to use CSS on my v2. But I'm in the process of learning how to use it.

Tables are super easy! Heck, I learned those before CSS! Get the HTML editor Arachnophilia 4.0. Its the older version but I think its the best. Get it here.
 
Back