- 5,226
- Nicest part of hell
I'm wondering if I'm doing something wrong or if others have the same issue.
For me, negative camber will result in less grip in corners, no matter the tire, no matter the stiffness of the suspension, no matter the car. Every single time I increased negative camber I got much less grip in the corners and braking got a LOT worse also. The first thing I do when I buy a car that has adjustable suspension is to give it neutral camber.
It feels like the tire model is an inflexible rectangle, just going from neutral camber to 0.5° degree negative camber will result in serious loss of traction, and its only downhill from there.
In all other Gran Tourismo Games I played around a lot with camber settings and I would usually end up between 2-4 degree negative camber on the front and 1.5° at the rear. As far as I know that is also true with most racing cars in real life - I know some touring cars have up to 4 degrees of negative camber at the front wheels.
- I am using a wheel BTW, if that makes any difference -
For me, negative camber will result in less grip in corners, no matter the tire, no matter the stiffness of the suspension, no matter the car. Every single time I increased negative camber I got much less grip in the corners and braking got a LOT worse also. The first thing I do when I buy a car that has adjustable suspension is to give it neutral camber.
It feels like the tire model is an inflexible rectangle, just going from neutral camber to 0.5° degree negative camber will result in serious loss of traction, and its only downhill from there.
In all other Gran Tourismo Games I played around a lot with camber settings and I would usually end up between 2-4 degree negative camber on the front and 1.5° at the rear. As far as I know that is also true with most racing cars in real life - I know some touring cars have up to 4 degrees of negative camber at the front wheels.
- I am using a wheel BTW, if that makes any difference -
Last edited: