Neocrox Photograph [Updated 28 - 07 - '09]

  • Thread starter Carlos
  • 15 comments
  • 776 views

Carlos

Premium
6,454
Netherlands
Netherlands
Hello! Here some pics from last weekend from the Superbikes at Assen.

1.
18763587.jpg


2.
20105486.jpg


3.
39037812.jpg


4.
15105661.jpg


5.
80494714.jpg


6.
87956210.jpg


7.
78338034.jpg


8.
25125716.jpg


9.
18999671.jpg


10.
61371152.jpg


11.
90943540.jpg


12.
71674580.jpg


13.
61681733.jpg


14.
62267134.jpg


15.
50896871.jpg


16.
52335027.jpg


17.
21381604.jpg


Pics taken with a Nikon D90 with 300-800 Sigma.
 
Last edited:
Thanks man! :dopey:

Yeah it's really a beast, pretty heavy. 6kilograms:nervous:

My mate's car
546616542_6_zY5p.jpeg


546616825_6_7BE_.jpeg


546616646_6_Kv8M.jpeg


546616755_6_1B9z.jpeg


485835492_6_0AiB.jpeg


Mate's R1
544132388_6_W6D2.jpeg


544129390_6_wR2a.jpeg


Random
544129411_6_igRj.jpeg


537671102_6_K0Xx.jpeg


515983629_6_UGRS.jpeg


My buddy on his Aprilia RSV Mille R
496416986_6_Hcto.jpeg


More soon:)
 
:drool:

Awesome shots

The two things I have trouble with are Panning and low light shots, but I'm not jealous, I'm inspired 👍
 
Excellent panning work. I would suggest fiddling with white balance more on your night shots, but still quite good.
 
:drool:

Awesome shots

The two things I have trouble with are Panning and low light shots, but I'm not jealous, I'm inspired 👍
Panning shots are quite easy me thinks..

With digicam:
Begin really early to follow the object and take the shot at the moment you want, but keep following the object. Put your elboys on your hips, for the most stability.

With DSLR:
Same as digicam, but put the shutter speed at 250 or 320 and diafragma at 8. That works the best for me..

@ Azuremen:
I only played with levels and a little bit of contrast. I've played around with some photos but this turned at the best.. Next time I use a longer shutterspeed time.

@ Syntax error:
Thank you! Panning photos are the easiest to enjoy the viewers becaus you really see the action. Photos of 'not living objects' are the thoughest job, I have so much more to learn to take a photo of a not moving object to get the emotion I want from the viewers.

@ NLxAROSA:
Thanks! That lens is really good, but too heavy actually..

Thanks for all the comments!
 
Wow no comments on the cat yet?

I love that shot so much, the depth of field is awesome, the tone is great. You've captured that warm fuzzy feeling associated with cats just right.... and I'm not even a cat fan (well except for lolcats :D)
 
Wow no comments on the cat yet?

I love that shot so much, the depth of field is awesome, the tone is great. You've captured that warm fuzzy feeling associated with cats just right.... and I'm not even a cat fan (well except for lolcats :D)

lol cats ftw!!!:dopey: But thank you verry much, I was a little bit disappointed no one said something about my sweet fat cat. I'm thinking of making it a poster..
 
In this last series, nr.2 (The S4 on the highway) really stands out. Good compo, car completely sharp, wheels nice and fuzzy, top notch! 👍 Should be in a magazine or brochure! :) The others are not up that quality IMO, especially that last one with the lens flare in it.
 
I assume you are using some sort of HDR or pseudo HDR technique? It tends to give itself away with the strange patches of dark and light that it creates on sections of the car to try and compensate for changes in light. Personally not a fan.

Your night time shots are not bad at all really but I would suggest (especially since you have a long exposure going from these shots) is instead of going with the HDR to get the car to be more visible is to get your hands on a speedlight and manually light the car up with a few flashes of it from a few different angles. As you have a long exposure anyway, you can set the speedlight to a low output and fire off multiples times with the pilot to make the car pop out of the shot just a little more without upsetting your shot with blowouts or underexposed bits.
 
Back