Nissan 350Z GT-S: Headed to our Showrooms?

  • Thread starter YSSMAN
  • 27 comments
  • 942 views

YSSMAN

Super-Cool Since 2013
Premium
21,286
United States
GR-MI-USA
YSSMAN
YSSMAN
Leftlanenews.com
A small team of Nissan development engineers working in their spare time have transformed a 350Z into a highly tuned 'Saturday Special.' Called the GT-S, the supercharged super coupé is a performance-focused version of Nissan's acclaimed 'Z-'car' and is designed to appeal to enthusiastic 350Z owners who simply want more. Although boasting a power hike and a substantially modified chassis, the GT-S is far from being a stripped out racing car with a rock hard ride and a peaky power delivery. "The GT-S has been created as a real car not an ornament," says Communications Director Wayne Bruce. "We wanted to build a 'Club Special' that could still be used to commute to work during the week but would provide added thrills at the weekend: a weekday workhorse and a weekend warrior in one distinctive package."

The project's technical leader Steve Robbins — who during the week is a senior engineer in the new vehicle evaluation team at NTCE — gathered together half a dozen like-minded enthusiasts to work on the project.

Working after hours and at the weekend, the team members came from within NTCE and also from outside suppliers and was known internally as the S-Club Seven…

Most of the changes center on the car's engine and chassis. Using a supercharger installation from Swiss manufacturers Novidem, power has increased by more than 25 per cent from 300 hp to 382 hp, while torque rises from 353 Nm to a heady 425Nm.

Performance gains are expected to include a one second cut in the benchmark 0-60mph time (5.8 seconds for the standard 350Z) with 2.5 seconds slashed from the 0-100 mph time.

And it sounds better, too, thanks to an electronically controlled by-pass valve that enriches the exhaust note at a pre-determined engine speed.

NTCE engineers — the very men who tuned the original 350Z to suit European roads and our higher speeds — have undertaken the suspension changes. Working closely with specialists from Bilstein, the changes concentrate on optimising road performance, with improvements in both handling ability and ride comfort. Wider wheels and tyres complete the chassis alterations.

A wind tunnel developed body/aero kit from German firm Strosek not only gives the all-black GT-S a distinctive look, but also improves the 350Z's aerodynamic performance with increased front and rear downforce at speed. The package is completed by a NVH pack which makes the GT-S even more civilised than the standard 350Z.

Steve Robbins said: "We could have produced a balls-out racer with huge power outputs and very little suspension movement. But while this would have created a superb racer, it would have been virtually unusable on the road. Instead we approached the GT-S from an engineering stand-point with a view to creating a 350Z that provides more of everything… performance, handling, looks, comfort and excitement.

"We also looked at the possible marketing potential of such a project and have designed the improvements as individual 'packs' — an engine pack, a suspension pack, aero pack and so on — and kept a close eye on costs."

So will the GT-S ultimately become more than a weekend project by a group of mavericks? Nissan is saying nothing officially, though insiders point to its appearance at Goodwood as a sign the company is giving the GT-S concept serious consideration.

1-2007-nissan-350z-gt-s-conept.jpg

2-2007-nissan-350z-gt-s-conept.jpg

3-2007-nissan-350z-gt-s-conept.jpg

4-2007-nissan-350z-gt-s-conept.jpg

5-2007-nissan-350z-gt-s-conept.jpg

6-2007-nissan-350z-gt-s-conept.jpg

That 350Z there is right purdy don't-cha think?

It is a very interesting preposition to see the car as a possible production model, but don't they allready have NISMO models that you can order from the factory? Granted, I like the idea, but the "necessity" of the car seems like it is floundering in a sea of high performance models both in the Nissan lineup and in lineups from around the world.

The Corvette is still faster, and given the presumed price increase above the track model at well over $10,000 that puts it into Corvette-range.

And with the GTR on the horizon, is a high-po 350Z really needed?

I say Nissan should build it anyway. Its not like they WON'T sell, there are plenty of die-hard Nissan fans out there, and I'm sure they will gobble the cars up pretty quick.
 
Ummm...omg? I just had a nocturnal emission...this is why I love Nissan. Once again proves the Z is the best looking non-supercar on the planet.
 
There's quite a tradition of British engineers working outside hours to produce something a little special (Jaguar XJ220 is a prime example). I think it looks good apart from the air intake infront of the bonnet (cooling/supercharger?). We might see it on Top Gear soon and see how it does on the board.
 
Onikaze
Really?

I'd be more excited if I noted where they said they had significantly reduced the weight of the car.

As often as I don't agree with you... you hit the nail right on the head with that one. :lol:

As it is, though, adding power can do nothing but help to address that porky shortcoming.

Designwise, it's a little gonzo... but in a Porsche GT3RS kind of way. Now if that were in a GT3RS kind of weigh, that'd be even better.
 
The 350Z never appeals to me.

Looks wise, it's a gorgeous car, solid, chunky proportions, nice lines, with good edges and creases.

Then I remember, it weighs more than a Mustang GT, another solid chunky car, with nice lines, good edges and creases, which costs less generally, and goes faster.
 
IMADreamer
Nice, what are the chances we will actually see that in the states?

If they decide to build it, which they might, I'd assume that the chances are pretty good given how well the 350Z has sold here.

...But, as noted before, with the GTR in the pipeline, is the model really all that necessary?
 
Onikaze
The 350Z never appeals to me.

Looks wise, it's a gorgeous car, solid, chunky proportions, nice lines, with good edges and creases.

Then I remember, it weighs more than a Mustang GT, another solid chunky car, with nice lines, good edges and creases, which costs less generally, and goes faster.

Goes faster?

-3,498 cc 3.5 liters V 6 front engine with 95.5 mm bore, 81.4 mm stroke, 10.3 compression ratio, double overhead cam, variable valve timing/camshaft and four valves per cylinder VQ35DE
-Premium unleaded fuel 91
-Fuel economy EPA highway (mpg): 26 and EPA city (mpg): 20
-Multi-point injection fuel system
-20.1 gallon main premium unleaded fuel tank
-Power: 224 kW , 300 HP SAE @ 6,400 rpm; 260 ft lb , 353 Nm @ 4,800 rpm
Curb Weight MT. 3339

2004 Nissan 350Z 0-60=5.3 ¼=13.77 (M.T. Mar '04)

-4,606 cc 4.6 liters V 8 front engine with 90.2 mm bore, 90 mm stroke, 9.8 compression ratio, overhead cam, variable valve timing/camshaft and three valves per cylinder
-Unleaded fuel 87
-Fuel economy EPA highway (mpg): 25 and EPA city (mpg): 17
-Multi-point injection fuel system
-16.1 gallon main unleaded fuel tank
-Power: 224 kW , 300 HP SAE @ 5,750 rpm; 320 ft lb , 434 Nm @ 4,500 rpm
Curb Weight MT. 3373

2005 Ford Mustang GT 4.6L V8 0-60=5.1 ¼=13.5 (MT Jan 05)

I don't see that much of a difference--drag racing these two will depend on the driver to see which crosses the finish line first. And I'd go so far as to mention that the 350Z handles much better than the Mustang GT--it's too bad TopGear hasn't timed the GT yet and no one has ran it on the 'ring. I suspect the 350Z would beat it on a course.
 
Old school designing. Nice to see it still it exists within the bigger companies 👍

Can't say it looks awesome, but I bet it goes like stink.
 
Skidpad has them both nearly identical, Slalom the Z pips the Stang by 2 mph I think, in gear acceleration the Stang wins, standing acceleration, the Stang wins by a little.

Around a track the Z wins, but the tests I can recall with the two cars dont have it leaving the Stang in the dust, more like a second or so around a longer track.

The difference, the basic Z starts at about what a fully optioned Mustang goes for, not the track model.
 
They did test the Mustang GT but not around the track, they liked it a lot. They joked about the handling like they do with most american cars but they liked the car and while it wasn't the best in it's class on corners it wasn't bad.
 
live4speed
They did test the Mustang GT but not around the track, they liked it a lot. They joked about the handling like they do with most american cars but they liked the car and while it wasn't the best in it's class on corners it wasn't bad.

I remember that episode, it was a good review. And I still maintain the 350Z out handles the Mustang GT quite easily. 👍
 
live4speed
And thats something I wouldn't dispute.

Have you ever driven the 6spd 350Z? It's such a great fun car, if you haven't taken one out you need to. It's too bad the insurance is so high for me otherwise I would of already owned one. Oh, and did I mention that they are the best looking non-supercar? :sly:
 
I've been a passenger in one but never driven one, they are great looking cars and great fun.
 
live4speed
They did test the Mustang GT but not around the track, they liked it a lot. They joked about the handling like they do with most american cars but they liked the car and while it wasn't the best in it's class on corners it wasn't bad.

Exactly. It's not a case of the Mustang being bad in the corners so much as a case of the track Z being better.
 
For $10,000 more.

I wasn't really comparing the Track Z though, more the "normal" Z with the closest price Mustang, which is a much closer matchup.
 
Ah, but if you to knock the Track-Spec 350Z down to the Base-Spec 350Z to better match the pricing of the Mustang GT (both at about $27K), would the performance be a lot closer? I belive the base version does without a few sporty suspension bits, obviously goes without the Brembro brakes, etc.

...Hmmm, now THAT would be an interesting duel.
 
That is the duel I was speaking of.

The Track Version gives a good fight, and bloodies the stang's nose a bit, the base 350Z still costs more, and doesn't come quite so well.
 
I'm in agreement with most people here: looks good, not necessary, should be built, should be lighter. I've always liked the 350Z, and it is definitely fun to drive, but less weight is the first thing that should be "added" to any car in the current market place for most obvious reason of fuel economy.

Perhaps it's Nissan's need to increase profits that keeps them from creating a truly GT3RS/CSL/Lotus-anything type of Z. The GT-S will probably be just fine, but doesn't it seem like it's just a bunch of off-the-shelf parts put together by a good tuner?

It's all bolt-on parts, and no changes have been made to the core of the car itself. Nissan could probably outsource the entire thing, supplying nothing but off-the-line finished 350Z's. There's nothing bad about the car; I'm sure it's a hoot. But I could swear I've seen it before....

http://cars.ign.com/articles/381/381045p2.html
 
Well, I had mentioned the NISMO S-Tune before as well. Does that not make up for it? I think you can order the NISMO R-Tune as well in the US.

I dunno. They could do it, maybe, just build a few hundred and push them into the marketplace. They will sell all of them, I guarantee it, but I don't think it would be a good idea for a full-production (say, greater than 2000 a year) model.
 
I thought R-Tunes weren't street legal? I remember that in Nismo's nomenclature, S-Tune is for the street, R-Tune is for track use only...

And it would be a serious shame to go to all that work for something that you can't take for a spin around the block.

RE: Mustang vs. Z, on a dollar to dollar basis. That would be a nice comparison test/article.
 
How do you get the S-Tune in Australia?

As for the R-Tune, it's nothing special. Well it's fairly old and the S-Tune has now replaced it.


2004-Nissan-Nismo-350Z-R-Tune-FA-Track-1024x768.jpg



" Powering the Z is a NISMO-enhanced Nissan VQ35 3.5-liter V6 producing approximately 305 horsepower. The engine was treated to NISMO R-tune billet camshafts, NISMO R-tune cold-air intake, NISMO R-tune headers and the NISMO S-tune stainless steel cat-back exhaust system. Backing the powerplant is a 6-speed manual featuring a NISMO R-tune lightweight flywheel and a NISMO R-tune single disk clutch and clutch cover, and NISMO shift knob, all for increased efficiency and shift feel. A NISMO R-tune clutch-type adjustable limited-slip differential with four pinion gears ensures reliable launches.

The Z’s handling prowess has been improved with the S-tune suspension system, designed for increased roll stiffness, less body lean, less pitch and dive and more neutral handling. It features a 36mm front sway bar, 22mm rear sway bar, special shocks and springs. Braking power is increased with NISMO R-tune brake pads and steering power remains reliable thanks to an R-tune power steering oil cooler kit."
 
They don't sell the cars packaged from what I understand now. Apparently the ones I saw at the dealer (I talked to my friend who works there) were ones they had built to sell. Oh, and it was an S-Tune, not an R-Tune that they had.
 

Latest Posts

Back