- 1,374
- SF Bay Area
- Yuisan
- EYuiSan
Last edited:
Just saw the Peugeot 208 commercial that won an award. It's so crappy, compared to the original, because it's all computer animated (and very poorly animated).
Here's the original 205 commercial, back in the 80's before computers destroyed the art of making films.
Just saw the Peugeot 208 commercial that won an award. It's so crappy, compared to the original, because it's all computer animated (and very poorly animated).
Here's the original 205 commercial, back in the 80's before computers destroyed the art of making films.
So because of crappy animated ones like this, computers have completely "destroyed the art of making films". Have you seen Jurassic park?
I have, it wasn't bad. What's bad though is when film makers can't bother shooting live action and just makes a computer animation instead. Even if they had made good animation work in this film I would still prefer the original film because regardless of how well you animate a Hercules plane the real deal is always better.
And what if said maker didn't have access to said C-130 and CGI was the only realistic option, then what?
And what if said maker didn't have access to said C-130 and CGI was the only realistic option, then what?
Then perhaps they should keep looking for a script where they can do a quality job instead of needing to half-ass it.
I agree with you that there's nothing innately wrong with CGI, but there are times when it's not appropriate. Unfortunately, a lot of film makers seem to use it as a cheap get-out-of-jail-free card for difficult shots, instead of using it to make their film better. Computers didn't destroy the art of making film, but it made it a lot easier for hacks to just fob work off on animators, instead of doing their job and thinking about how best the shot could be made.
That pic of that Peugeot is awesome.Lets see the 205 in GT6 shall we! :
View attachment 307199 View attachment 307200 View attachment 307201 View attachment 307203 View attachment 307204 View attachment 307205
Lets see the 205 in GT6 shall we! :
Of course.Aren't these pics technically CGI...???
Today.How long before the blog post about the Bathurst 12h gets posted?
Ah, but is it photoshop? Or is it a "devkit special"? The "dirt" textures aren't that fine in GT6.Today.
http://pitstop.gran-turismo.com/en/article/1483
I like how they avoid getting permission to use the real photos by just making their own using GT6. Right down to the car driving along the pit wall at the finish. They even dirtied the rear bumper.
WAIT THE SECOND!Interesting! I knew the dirt was procedural, just didn't think it was that detailed in most cases.
But if it's actually, technically, damage, then it sort of makes sense it's the same in both shots. It still seems like a mistake to be so apparently detailed.
It should be noted that 1.16 of timing in the MAZDA LM55 VGT of updates, so you are lifting of the ban is paint of Chaparral 2X VGT, here also please by all means try to check.