Peugeot 908 RC Concept 2006

[MisterWaffles]

I personally think this looks better than the actual car. (If they do put it in they'd need to get rid of the xbox logos)

This is just a design concept and not a running model, but if it did run I suppose it would use the same drivetrain as the race car.

I also think some of the concept cars in GT never drove in real life (GT-R Proto), so this would be no different

The overall design is relatively simple, a main pod housing the driver and the engine, and the bulk of the body featuring various aerodynamic bits. The headlights are different from any Peugeot road car or any other Lmp at that. It has a white livery with red accents and stripes with a v12 logo inside a lion's head and Xbox advertising (Ironic as it never appeared in forza as far as I'm concerned). It also features some cool but strange blue tinted windows. It has "908" and "HDi FAP" printed on certain areas

Specs: (of the real 908)

Year: 2006
Engine: 5.5 litre twin-turbo V12 (Wikipedia states "over 730hp")
Weight: 930kg (2,050.3 lbs)
Length: 183 inches
Wheelbase (Width) 116.1 inches

The car would need to be standard as there is no interior on the model

 

[Famine]

Please don't wrap your year in parentheses in the thread title.

 

[MisterWaffles]

Please don't wrap your year in parentheses in the thread title.

Fine, but I'm pretty sure it's not breaking any rules

 

[GranTurismo916]

Fine, but I'm pretty sure it's not breaking any rules

Yes it is.
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/threads/cars-suggestion-forum-guidelines.312878/

 

[MisterWaffles]

Yes it is.
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/threads/cars-suggestion-forum-guidelines.312878/

I just read that entire post and found nothing that specifically states "no parentheses". In fact, that's the post I refered to before posting

 

[Famine]

I just read that entire post and found nothing that specifically states "no parentheses". In fact, that's the post I refered to before posting

I can't tell if you're joking or not, but did you by any chance notice anywhere in that post where the correct format for the year is "(year)"?

The reason for that is because it isn't there. I mean, there's lots of things in there that I didn't say not to do, because I only listed the things that you should do - and putting the year in parentheses is not one of those things.

 

[MisterWaffles]

I can't tell if you're joking or not, but did you by any chance notice anywhere in that post where the correct format for the year is "(year)"?

The reason for that is because it isn't there. I mean, there's lots of things in there that I didn't say not to do, because I only listed the things that you should do - and putting the year in parentheses is not one of those things.

Sure, you can argue that it doesn't have it in the example, and therefore you shouldn't put it, but you can also argue that it doesn't say you can't or should not post it anywhere on the guideline.

(Besides, it's only two characters)

 

[JockeP22]

Liked.

And also, FAP lol.

 

[Famine]

Sure, you can argue that it doesn't have it in the example, and therefore you shouldn't put it, but you can also argue that it doesn't say you can't or should not post it anywhere on the guideline.

And I repeat that if I were to write every possible thing you can't or shouldn't have in there, it'd be a very long document indeed.

The correct format is what is listed. The incorrect format would be anything not listed - save for any exceptions I haven't thought of (which I also say in that link).

Besides, it's only two characters, and sure you may say they look out of place, but the majority that views this thread probably doesn't care

Whether it's a majority of people who don't care or not is irrelevant.

But now you'll remember it in future, so it's all awesome.

 

[Aphelion]

Sure, you can argue that it doesn't have it in the example, and therefore you shouldn't put it, but you can also argue that it doesn't say you can't or should not post it anywhere on the guideline.

Besides, it's only two characters, and sure you may say they look out of place, but the majority that views this thread probably doesn't care

Does it really matter to you this much? Just listen to the admin.

 

[MisterWaffles]

Liked.

And also, FAP lol.

Sorry, couldn't resist

Does it really matter to you this much? Just listen to the admin.

Sorry, I get really pissed off when people tell me to make extremely minor changes on the internet. Also he changed it, why is this even still going on?

 

[Man of Mister]

@MrWaflz55 you might want to watch the double posting bud

And I do like the Concept 908, but I am still searching for the windshield wipers if I'm ever taking that to Le Mans...

 

[MisterWaffles]

@MrWaflz55 you might want to watch the double posting bud

And I do like the Concept 908, but I am still searching for the windshield wipers if I'm ever taking that to Le Mans...

Just found the title edit button , I also added a pole because I found that button under the same menu.
I think it relates to that pretty well.

 

[Man of Mister]

Hey, I think that a standard interior is better than no interior at all! Also, is that a headlight I see on the nose?

 

[MisterWaffles]

Hey, I think that a standard interior is better than no interior at all! Also, is that a headlight I see on the nose?

I think that's the Peugeot logo, but it looks almost transparent from the side. The reflection gives the appearance of a glass dome on the nose. I'll add more photos to the op tomorrow

Edit: I've been looking around Google images with my phone and I can't find too many photos outside of the one already on this thread and a die cast model

 

[MisterWaffles]

I know this is a double post, but I figured out you can upload on mobile, so now there are more images detailing the car in full

 

[Cristobal1234]

Peugeot 908 RC Concept 2006

Wrong title. This car is called Peugeot 908 V12 HDi DPFS.

This is the Peugeot 908 RC Concept.